• Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.149-154
• /
• 2004

이 논문에서는 표본조사에서 자주 사용되는 표본의 대표성, 비편향성, 그리고 효율성에 개넘에 대하여 고찰하였다. 표본의 대표성은 조사단위의 포함확률로 표현되며 조사모집단의 포함범위와 연관이 있는 반면, 비편향성과 효율성은 표집설계와 추정량에 관련된 개념이다. 비편향성과 효율성은 표본의 대표성을 전제로 하며 가중치 부여로 나타난다

• Survey Research
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.39-62
• /
• 2005

In this paper we investigate some concepts frequently called in sample surveys such as 'representative of sample' as well as 'consistency', 'unbiasedness', and 'efficiency' in estimation. The first is strongly related with sampling procedure including coverage rate of survey population, response rate in establishment survey, and recruit rate of final samples. The others, however, are concerned with both sampling design and corresponding estimators simultaneously. Whereas both consistency and unbiasedness are based on the representative sample, efficiency does not depend on the representative sample. The representative of sample can be increased by raising the rate of coverage, response and recruit as well. Consistency may be investigated according to variables of interest and auxiliary variables. The well-known raing-ratio weighting method is a method to increase consistency of auxiliary variables by means of matching population size in each cell. Efficiency is not directly related with the representative of sample, and allocation methods such as proportional and Neyman allocation in stratified sampling and post-stratification are all methods to increase the efficiency of estimation under the condition of satisfying the representative of sample.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.28 no.3
• /
• pp.417-427
• /
• 2015

Measures in response rate used to measure the representativeness of the sample (the more high response rate) better explain the representativeness of the sample. However, we cannot often explain the representativeness of the sample because there is nonresponse even in the high response rate. Therefore, Schouten et al. (2009) presented a new R-indicator measure that can be described as a representative of the sample. We research the new estimator of the R-indicator in this paper because there are parameters that require estimations. We describe the meanings as representative of the R-indicator; consequently, the bias and efficiency of the proposed estimator for R-indicator are compared to the existing estimator under various simulations. The representativeness of the sample is also explained by applying the proposed estimators in the actual data.

• Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.55-60
• /
• 2004

하나의 가구에서 대표되는 사람을 뽑는 문제가 조사의 마지막 단계에서 종종 발생한다. 일반적으로 가구내에서 성별과 연령에 따라 최종 조사단위로 선정되는 표본은 대표성에 문제가 있기 때문에 이를 해결하기 위한 방법으로서 Kish-격자를 이용한 방법을 사용하게 된다. 본 논문에서는 한국의 가구형태에 따라 기존의 Kish-격자를 수정하여 대표성 있는 표본을 선택하는 문제를 다루었다.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.69-82
• /
• 2017

R-indicator (representativeness indicator) is used to check the representativeness of samples when non-responses occur. The representativeness is related with the accuracy of parameter estimator and the accuracy is related with bias of the estimator. Hence, unbiased estimator generates high accuracy. Therefore, high value of R-indicator guarantees the accuracy of parameter estimation with a small bias. R-indicator is calculated through propensity scores obtained by logit or probit modeling. In this paper we investigate the degree of relation between R-indicator and different non-response rates in strata using simulation studies. We also analyze a modified Korea Economic Census data for real data analysis.

• 대한방사선방어학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2009.04a
• /
• pp.122-123
• /
• 2009

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.515-530
• /
• 2015

The concepts of sample and sampling are central to make a statistically correct decision, so we need to be emphasized their importance in the statistics education. Nevertheless, there were not enough studies which discuss how to teach the concepts of sample and sampling. In this study, teaching sample and sampling is addressed by foreign curricula and cases of instruction in order to obtain suggestions for teaching sample and sampling. In particular, the curricular of Australia, New Zealand, England and the United States are analyzed, considering the sample representativeness and the sampling variability; the two elements in the concept of sample. Also foreign textbooks and cases of instruction when it comes to teach sample are analyzed. The results say that with respect to teach sample can be divided into four suggestions: first, sample was taught in the process of statistical inquiry such as data collection, analysis, and results. Second, sample was introduced earlier than Korea curriculum. Third, when it comes to teach sample, sample variability, as well as sample representativeness was considered. Fourth, technological tools were used to enhance understanding sample.

• Survey Research
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.31-48
• /
• 2004

We collected and analyzed 18 social surveys to assess the quality of samples with respect to region, gender, age-band, education level and occupation. We found in our samples that highly educated people and house wives are over-represented whereas low educated people, self-employed/blue collars and white collars are under-represented. To correct such sample distortions, we applied the iterative proportional weighting or the raking to our samples. We observed sizable changes in survey results. Also, the effective sample sizes were shrunken up to 20%-40%, that could be interpreted as the necessity of larger samples to meet the claimed sampling error limits.

• Proceedings of the Korean Association for Survey Research Conference
• /
• 2006.12a
• /
• pp.11-40
• /
• 2006

시간의 흐름에 따라 사회 구성원들에 대한 행태 연구나 사회의 변화가 개인의 행동양식에 미치는 영향 등에 대한 조사에서는 어느 한 시점에서의 구성원들에 대한 횡단면 조사와는 다르게 다년간 지속적으로 조사개체를 추적조사 해야 하는 종단면 조사 또는 패널조사를 수행해야 한다. 패널조사는 횡단면 조사와는 달리 최초 표본이 시간이 지남에 따라 조사 대상 표본으로부터 탈락함으로서 발생하는 표본의 마모와 그에 따른 대표성 상실의 문제이다. 그러므로 이러한 표본의 대표성 상실 문제를 적절히 해결하기 위해 적용 가능한 방법이 가중치 조정 방법이다 횡단면 조사에서는 (1)추출가중치의 조정, (2)무응답 가중치 조정, (3)사후층화 가중치 조정과 같이 3단계의 가중치 조정과정을 수행하지만, 패널 조사의 경우 이와 더불어 원 표본의 대표성을 유지하기 위해 종단면 가중치(longitudinal weight)를 함께 고려해야 한다. 이러한 관점에서 본 연구에서는 다양한 패널형태에 따른 가중치 조정 방법에 대해 고찰하고, 향후 수행될 한국복지패널(Korea Welfare Panel Study: KWPS)의 가중치 산정에 관한 이론적 근거를 마련함과 동시에 현재 국내에서 수행되고 있는 패널조사의 가중치 조정방법과 비교하고자 한다.

• Survey Research
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.157-172
• /
• 2009

For a survey research in which the characteristics of the population of interest are investigated from a sample, representativeness of the sampling frame is one of the most important part to be considered. If the sampling frame fails to represent the population properly, statistical procedures based on the even efficient sampling design result in significant nonsampling biases and thus the statistical validities of the results could be damaged. But the construction of the reliable sampling frame that covers the population properly costs money and time and thus the sampling frame based on a census or a large scale survey is often used in practice. For example, the sampling frame based on the population households census is used for many household surveys in Korea. But due to the time difference between the census and a survey of interest, the sampling frame constructed from the census is expected to fail to cover the population of interest. Especially, one could expect a large amount of population and household movement in a large city like Seoul. Thus in our research, we considered the construction of new sampling frame and the procedure of sample selection for 2008 Seoul survey. We analyzed the sampling frame based on 2005 population households census and found that it does not represent the population properly. Thus, we proposed a new sampling frame based on resident registration DB for 2008 Seoul survey. We also proposed the sampling weights and estimator of the population mean based on the sample selected from the newly constructed sampling frame.