• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 1997.05a
• /
• pp.450-457
• /
• 1997

저출력/정지시의 사고가 노심손상에 미치는 영향이 작지 않은데 비하여, 그 영향에 대한 평가 체계는 확립되어 있지 않다. 특히 인적오류가 차지하는 비중이 크며 이에 따라 인적오류를 평가할 수 있는 절차를 마련하여야 한다. 본 논문에서는 전출력시의 체계를 기반으로 저출력/정지시의 특성을 고려하여 인적오류를 평가할 수 있는 체계인 SEPLOT (Systematic Evaluation Procedure for LP&S Operation Tasks)을 개발하였다. SEPLOT에서는 영향도(Influence Diagrams)를 이용하여 인적오류에 영향을 주는 수행특성인자들을 동시에 고려함으로써 수행특성인자들 사이의 의존성 평가를 가능하게 하였고, 저출력/정지시의 특성을 반영할 수 있도록 절차서의 질, 인간-기계 연계, 다중 인간행위 사이의 의존성 등의 수행특성인자들이 중요하게 고려되도록 하였다. 이를 이용하여 참조 원전의 저출력/정지시 대표적인 작업인 소외전원상실사고 대응 작업 중 하나인 일차 충전 및 유출 운전(Primary Feed and Bleed)에 대하여 평가함으로써, 저출력/정지시 다른 여러 가지 수행작업들에 대한 인적오류에도 개발된 체계가 적용 가능함을 보여 주었다.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.7 no.4
• /
• pp.83-91
• /
• 2007

Information security is a critical issue for network centric warfare(NCW). This paper provides a information security governance index for NCW, which is a result of the research through a group decision making process. The purpose of the research is to intended to help military organization's planners determine the degree to which they have implemented an information systems governance framework at the strategic and tactical level within their organization.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.535-538
• /
• 2006

FMEA(Failure Mode & Effect Analysis)는 발생 가능한 잠재 고장의 형태와 그 영향을 평가하고 고장을 예방할 수 있도록 표를 이용하여 체계적으로 접근하는 방법이다. FMEA를 활용하여 전자 의료기기의 신뢰성을 평가할 수 있는 방안에 대한 연구를 통해 의료기기의 신뢰성 향상을 위한 체계적인 접근이 요구된다. 본 연구에서는 소프트웨어의 신뢰성을 평가하기 위한 체계를 구축하기 위해 FMEA 기법을 근간으로 하여 전자 의료기기의 신뢰성 평가 체계 구축에 적용할 수 있는 방안을 수립하고자 한다.

• The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences
• /
• v.35 no.11B
• /
• pp.1715-1724
• /
• 2010

This paper analyzes the limitations and provides alternative options for Korean Military LISI model, which is based on interoperability assessment model, LISI(Level of Information System Interoperability), developed for US defense information systems and reformed to suit the Korean Military environment by ADD. Korean Military's LIST model is applied to all systems(information system, weapon systems, non-weapon systems)' interoperability assessment defined in acquisition regulations by Joint Interoperability Test Center, a subordinate unit of Defense Command and Control Forces and the only assessment agency of defense interoperability. LISI was basically developed as an assessment model for information system's interoperability, but due to it's shortfall in assessing complex systems including information systems, weapon and non-weapon systems required from New environment SOSI(System of Systems Interoperability) has recently been researched and developed. On the other hand, it is inevitable that Korean Military's LISI model face fundamental limitations as an interoperability assessment tool for Defense Information System as well as for weapon and non-weapon systems, since it was benchmarked and reformed from the US LISI model. In order to overcome such limitations, MND and associated agencies are providing improvement methods through studies. This paper will provide LISI capability model's assessment criteria on Application(P), Infrastructure(I), Data(D), restraints of on comparison assessment process of unit systems evaluated and politic alternatives to overcome the restraints.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.10
• /
• pp.549-559
• /
• 2015

This study aimed to find the problems of evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine and seek the future development direction by evaluating the quality of oriental medicine related systematic review(SR) studies using AMSTAR tool. The 26 SR studies related to oriental medicine were searched from the database of DBPIA, OASIS, and KISS, and they were evaluated on the basis of AMSTAR. The average of AMSTAR for the quality assessment of SR studies was 6.0 point, and the 26 studies included 2 high quality studies (7.7 %), 21 normal quality studies (80.8 %), and 3 low quality studies (11.5 %). The quality of studies was not correlated with the publication years. The quality of oriental medicine related SR studies need to be improved steadily. Furthermore, continued efforts to promote the evidence-based practice in the field of Oriental Medicine will help to establish foundation for the convergence approach in the healthcare sector.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.87-96
• /
• 2011

The importance of the security management system for the aviation infrastructure cannot be overemphasized. What is especially important on the security management system for it is the assessment that is detaild and systematic. This article presents a framework based on a Hanulcha-type security management system model for a Information security of the Aviation infrastructure. This system checks, estimates and analyzes the goal of security with effect, especially in case of the security-accident on the aviation infrastructure because this system model gives the integrated security assessment method.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.277-281
• /
• 2023

Recent aggressive threats by North Korea using small drones have heavily impacted on ROK(Republic of Korea) society and it seems to be agreed that counter-drone systems are required to protect our properties. ROK government has been investigating current counter-drone systems for national important facilities. However, there is no consensus standard to evaluate the systems. This paper is to propose a counter-drone system evaluation framework which is the outcome through RMA(Revolution in Military Affairs) thinking process. The RMA thinking process is currently well-implemented in ROK army to develop future military strategy. The proposed framework has 4 categories - threat analysis of North Korea small drones, convergence of detection, tracking and neutralizing systems, integrated operations and available experts and organization - which have corresponding criteria.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.13-20
• /
• 2011

This study aimed to seek the ways of improving program outcomes assessment systems for engineering education accreditation of South Korea through performing comparative analysis on those of the United States. Case-study research method was implemented to achieve the research goal. Five university programs, which have been well recognized as good practices in engineering education accreditation in the United States, were selected and analyzed. In addition, those of three universities in South Korea were chosen for comparative analysis, which were reformed by university affiliated Engineering Education Innovative Centers. The analysis results indicated that there were differences in each program's program outcomes, assessment level of program outcomes, evaluation methods on program outcomes achievement, and analysis and improvement records. It was drawn up that the evaluation methods on program outcomes achievement should be paid full attention. For better program outcomes assessment system, however, the followings are in more attention. Firstly, to establish program outcomes reflecting program goal. Secondly, to set up the detailed plans for analysis and quality improvement on program outcomes. Thirdly, to keep continuing efforts on curriculum update.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2022.05a
• /
• pp.5-5
• /
• 2022

하천의 서식처 특성 즉, 수리, 하도 및 하안 특성 평가의 목적은 하천기본계획 수립과 하천복원사업의 실행과정에 있어 기본방향의 설정 및 통합적 평가기준으로서 사업의 성공여부를 평가하고, 또한 하천 이용과 보전, 나아가 복원계획에 대한 잠재적인 적합성의 근거를 파악하고 이에 가치를 부여하기 위함이다. 본 연구에서는 하천 실무자가 적용할 수 있는 물리 서식처의 수리 및 하도 특성 평가를 위한 지표와 정량적 평가기준을 마련함에 있어 선진국 하천의 분류체계 및 물리 서식처 평가기준을 검토하였다. 또한, 검토 결과를 토대로 우리나라 하천의 물리적 특성을 반영할 수 있는 하천의 유형을 분류하고 각 유형의 특성을 반영할 수 있는 정량적 평가기준을 제시하고자 하였다. 평가체계의 가장 중요한 특징 중 하나는 개발 목적에 따라 하천의 물리, 생태, 경관, 이용 상황 등을 고려하여 하천환경의 다양성과 고유성을 제대로 반영한 평가시스템으로 구축하였다. 하도특성을 지배하는 주요 인자로 하상경사와 하상재료를 조합하여 급경사, 중경사, 완경사로 하천유형을 분류하고 하도 및 수리, 하안 및 식생, 하천교란 등의 3개 영역으로 하천을 세분화하여 평가 시스템을 구축하였으며, 또한 하천환경의 수리 및 하도특성의 정도는 두 가지로 첫째는 하천의 자연적인 모습인 참조하천의 관련된 것이고 나머지는 인간에 의해 교란된 비교하천으로 보았으며, 인간에 의해 교란된 정도와 서식처 기반 수준에 따라 1등급에서 5등급으로 등급화하여 평가체계를 구성하였다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.921-932
• /
• 2015

We proposed a new scoring system on software vulnerabilities, which calculates quantitatively the severity of software vulnerabilities. The proposed scoring system consists of metrics for vulnerability severity and scoring equations; the metrics are designed to measure the severity of a software vulnerability considering the prevalence of the vulnerability, the risk level of the vulnerability, the domestic market share of the software and the frequency of the software. We applied the proposed scoring system to domestically reported software vulnerabilities, and discussed the effectiveness of the scoring system, comparing it with CVSS and CWSS. We also suggested the prospective utilization areas of the proposed scoring system.