• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Industrial Systems Conference
• /
• 2001.05a
• /
• pp.256-260
• /
• 2001

본 논문에서는 디지털 이동전화(CDMA) 채널환경을 통과한 왜곡된 전화음성에 대해 객관적 음질평가 척도의 개발을 위한 기초 연구로서 기존의 CD(Cepstral Distance), MSD(Mel Spectral Distance), BSD(Bark Spectral Distance), Modified BSD, PSQM(Perceptual Speech Quality Measure)를 대상으로 객관척도 알고리즘을 성능평가 하였다. 이 척도들은 실제 이동전화 환경에서 수집된 PCS 음성데이터에 대해서 적용하였으며 이 결과치를 주관적 음질평가 방법인 MU와 상관성을 비교 조사하였다. 실험 결과, BSD와 MBSD, 그리고 PSQM 척도의 상관성이 각각 0.80, 0.85, 0.84로 나타났으며 CD, MSD 보다 성능이 상대적으로 더 우수함을 보였다.

• Science of Emotion and Sensibility
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.61-70
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to develop 'Emotion Rating Scale induced by Odors'and to identify the structure of odor emotion induced by odors. At first 37 adjectives that describe odor to develop a rating scale were selected. Subjects were to rate odor emotion on a 7-point bipolar scale. 304 subjects participated and were as a group instructed to rate odor emotion. 53 out of 304 subjects were retested to test for reliability of the scale two weeks after under the same condition and finally 25 adjectives were then selected based on high test-retest reliability and factor loading, high contributing to one factor. 24 subjects each in 10s, 20s, 30s & 40s were to rate odor emotion induced by 5 different odors on the scale developed. The structure of odor emotion consisted of 'Esthetics', 'Intensity', 'Romance', 'Nature'and 'Character'. The structure of odor emotion by age appeared quite similar but that by different odors was little bit different.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Simulation Conference
• /
• 1997.04a
• /
• pp.66-71
• /
• 1997

생존 트래픽 비율로만 정의되는 기존의 생존도는 통신 재난시 트래픽의 상대적 중 요도와 복구기간에 대한 생존도를 적절히 반영하지 못한다. 따라서 트래픽의 상대적 중요도 에 따라 트래픽을 복구함으로써 재난의 사회적 영향을 최소화하고 복구기간을 반영하는 새 로운 평가척도로서 재난영향 평가척도를 제시한다. DCS 전송망에 대해 제시한 재난 영향 평가척도 및 기존의 생존도를 계산하기 위하여 통신재난 시나리오 분석 시스템을 이용한다. 통신재난 시나리오 분석 시스템[1]은 장애발생, 복구방법 및 복구과정 관련 시나리오등으로 구성되므로 DCS 전송망에 대한 생존도 계산이 가능하다. 통신재난 시나리오 분석 시스템을 이용하여 다양한 전송망에 대해 얻은 재난영향 평가척도 결과 및 기존 생존도 결과를 비교 하였다.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.483-497
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the Teacher's Scale for Gifted Preschool Children(TSGPC). Participation of this study were 357 preschool children and their parents and teachers from Seoul, Ulsan, Daegy, Gwangiu & Daejeon. Data were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis, Pearson's r, t-test and Cronbach's ${\alpha}$. Results are as follows. (1) exploratory factor analysis of TSGPC revealed that a 5-factor solution (academic ability, creativity, task commitment, artistic talent, and leadership) was the best fit. (2) Correlations between TSGPC and parental rating scale for young children's giftedness were significant. (3) Scores of TSGPC between gifted children and general children were significantly different (4) Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ ranged from .82 and .91 for subscale of TSGPC and .93 for the total scale. These results show that the Teacher's Scale for Gifted Preschool Children is quite reliable and valid measure.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2018.11a
• /
• pp.286-288
• /
• 2018

본 발표는 대한민국 해기사 커뮤니케이션 역량 강화를 위해, 해사 영어 구술시험 개발의 필요성을 타국의 사례 등을 통해 제안하고, 이를 위해 시범 개발 중인 "한국형 해사 영어 구술시험"의 개발 제작 과정과 현재 개발 진행 사항을 공유하고, 향후 추진 방향을 모색하기 위함이다. 따라서 본 발표에서는, 구술시험 평가 수립을 위한 유관 산업 문헌 조사(국제 교통 관련 산업 의사소통 지침, 평가 척도), 해기사 직무에 따른 영어 구술시험 문제 개발 계획 수립 및 시험 설계 시 검토 사항, 모의 구술시험 설계 및 시행, 모의시험 효과 측정, 측정 결과에 따른 향후 평가 척도 개발 시 고려 사항, 구술 평가를 인공지능 평가 방법 도입 방안 모색 등의 과정을 순차적으로 소개하고, 이에 대한 결과물을 공유하며, 향후 발전 방향을 제안하고자 한다.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.61 no.3
• /
• pp.55-76
• /
• 2009

This study tested the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Capacity-to-Consent Screen: K-CCS) scale. A total of 404 South Korean older adults were e Cruited using the purposive sampling method. The participants were asked to res-Cod to a structured questiConaire which included older adults' characteristics, ADLs, IADLs, cognitive impairments and creen: K-CCS) scale. A total of. Item analysis, explonalory factor analysis(EFA), and ) sfirmalory factor analysis(CFA) were cCoducted to verifK-Che psychometric properties of the Korean Version of CCS. The sample was divided into two groups: one group for EFA(n=202) alysis(Eois(r group for CFA(n=202). The totults revealeysisae. he final version of the 8-item K-CCS with two dimensions had a excellent internof. Itemstencyonofpha value=.f) alysa CFA) sfirmed the acceptaas diviof the modef.fdi(RMSEA=.057, NNFI=.f4, IFI=.f6, CFI=.f6) to twaddition, claims for the convergent and criterion-related validdiviwere demItetnaled. Ity-tnclusion, the K-CCS can be rmed for professi sams to asersioolder participants' capacity to consent to clinical or survey research.

• Science of Emotion and Sensibility
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.7-13
• /
• 2004

To develop the scale of usability evaluation on smart jacket for everyday life, we selected four types of smart jackets based on the result of previous study and evaluated their usability. Considering both the embedded machine and the purpose, smart jackets can be classified four types. As the result of previous study, sixty items for evaluation of user experience were constructed. In this study, we extracted ten categorization factors from the results of usability evaluation of smart jackets. Also, the relative importance of usability factors varied according to the types of smart jackets. These results suggest that not only usability factors themselves but also the order of priority of usability evaluation can vary according to the type of smart jacket in design process.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartD
• /
• v.11D no.3
• /
• pp.625-634
• /
• 2004

When constructing a component based system, It is understood that identifying reusable and independent business components is of utmost importance. However, according to conventional component based developing methodologies, most of developers depend on their experience and/or intuition for identification of business components. Furthermore, there are no criteria to evaluate whether the identified business components are more independently defined or not. Therefore, we propose a component identification metrics to apply to component properties In order to complement the difficulties of identifying business components through developers' experience and/or intuition. The metrics defined are the criteria for identifying the business Components and/or for evaluating the Identified components. We propose both a cohesion metric, and a coupling metric, to which component properties are applied, wherein those properties can be understood by high cohesion in, and low coupling between, components. Moreover, we propose an independence metric that can evaluate the degree of independence for a particular component by ratio of the cohesion and coupling of components. The metrics that we propose are applied to case study which demonstrates the identification of more independent business components and the validity of our metrics.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2010.11a
• /
• pp.236-239
• /
• 2010

소프트웨어 신뢰성 보증을 위한 소프트웨어 신뢰성 평가 프로세스는 다양한 관점에서 대상 소프트웨어 시스템뿐만 아니라 관련된 조직 및 개발 프로세스에 대한 분석을 필요로 한다. 특히, 신뢰성 평가 프로세스 수행 단계 중 단계별 척도 식별단계는 대상 시스템의 도메인 특성을 반영해야 하는 까다로운 작업이다. 현재 신뢰성 관련 척도들이 여러 문서에 다양한 의미로 혼재해 있어 이를 조사하는데 많은 노력이 들며 대상 시스템 환경에 적합한 척도 식별을 위해 불필요하게 많은 회의와 인터뷰를 진행하고 있는 실정이다. 본 논문에서는 표준문서 및 관련문헌에 근거하여 신뢰성 척도 POOL 을 구성하고 각 척도 원시 데이터의 수집 조건에 기반한 적용조건 매트릭스를 이용하여 기존의 신뢰성 관련 척도 조사 및 수집, 척도 식별 과정에서 소요되는 자원, 시간의 낭비를 줄이고자 한다. 이 방법을 적용하였을 때 소요된 시간과 기존의 회의를 통해 소요되는 시간을 비교하여 본 논문에서 제시하는 방법의 효과를 평가한다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.269-276
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to investigate validation of the School Function Assessment(SFA) for Korean Version using Rasch analysis. The subjects were recruited 98 students with disabilities in Seoul, Kyoung-Ki, Chung-cheung. The data were analysed using Rasch analysis to investigate unidimensionality and rating scale model. The 4 items out of SFA Part II were found to be misfts. The 18 items out of physical tasks, the 14 items out of cognitive/behavioral tasks in Part III were found to be misfit. All rating scale in SFA was appropriate. Further studies are needed to investigate validity and criterion cut-off score for many students with disabilities.