• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.41 no.1
• /
• pp.55-84
• /
• 2007

This study is to develop school library Policy model in accordance with guidelines suggested in policy science theories and to evaluate school library policy with application of "Activation Agenda for School Libraries". The guidelines on the evaluation of school library Policy were based on the models suggested in education policy and school library Policy theories. Selected guidelines were examined through survey distributed to evaluators and telephone interviews. Although overall evaluation results on school library policy were positive, it is suggested that more efforts for Policy improvement are needed.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.37 no.2
• /
• pp.97-126
• /
• 2006

According to the 7th education curriculum and advent of information society people expect the school library to do various things. Based on an evaluation model of education policy, the policy process of the school library was divided into an agenda setting, policy making and policy implementation. Then I developed a method of evaluation from an administrative and political point of view. Using this, I analyzed problems with school library policy and I categorized them. I suggested better solutions for Improving the school library policy.

• Water for future
• /
• v.52 no.10
• /
• pp.29-36
• /
• 2019

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.127-127
• /
• 2017

과학기술기본법 제12조 및 성과평가법 7조에 따라 국가연구개발 투자의 효율성 제고를 위해 장기간 대규모 예산이 투입되는 사업, 사업간 중복조정 또는 연계가 필요한 사업, 다수 중앙행정기관이 공동으로 추진하는 사업, 국가적 사회적 현안으로 대두된 사업 등에 대해 특정평가를 실시하고 있다. 사업군 특정평가는 "08년부터 "17년까지 총 17회 실시되었으나 사업군 단위의 평가보다 사업군 내 개별사업 중심으로 평가가 수행되어 왔다. 본 연구의 목적은 사업군 특정평가의 평가틀을 제시하는 것으로 기존의 사업 단위 특정평가 방법을 차용해왔던 방식을 사업군 단위 특정평가에 적합한 평가틀을 제안하고자 한다. 평가의 계층구조에서 사업평가와 정책평가 사이에 위치한 사업군 평가에 대한 틀 제시는 향후 과학기술분야의 정책평가 도입을 위한 탐색연구에 해당한다. 이러한 연구목적의 달성을 위해 먼저 기존에 수행되었던 사업군 특정평가의 사례들에 메타평가를 수행하여 현 사업군 평가틀의 한계를 조사하고, 국내외 정책평가 사례 분석을 통해 사업군 특정평가 틀에 활용 가능한 벤치마킹하고자 하였다. 이러한 기존 사업군 평가의 한계와 선행 정책 평가의 시사점을 바탕으로 사업군 특정평가틀을 제시하였다. 메타평가는 선행 문헌조사를 기초하여 본 연구에 적합한 메타평가틀을 구성하여 적용하였고, 국내외 정책평가 사례에 대한 선정과 분석은 정책평가 전문가들의 지문과 면접조사를 활용하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Academic Society of Industrial Cluster
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2007

Regional innovation and cluster policies are the new agenda of regional policy, an agenda that began to spread over recent years throughout different countries and regions. In this context, our main question arises: how are we going to evaluate regional innovation and cluster policies? What models and methods are we going to use? Since 1990, regional and national governments have put more emphasis on evaluation as a tool directed to produce knowledge to design better policies. The objective of this article is to summarise the main challenges arising from the evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies and make some methodological proposals that can contribute to produce better evaluations. In the first section, there is a brief presentation of regional innovation and cluster policies, followed by a more detailed analysis, in the second section, of their principal characteristics and of the main challenges posed by their evaluation. In the third section, some evaluation proposals that can help to improve current evaluation practice are presented. The paper concludes with a short number of general recommendations that we should bear in mind when designing an evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.29-48
• /
• 2020

For the visualization of outcome is relatively limited in informatization filed especially, systematic and quantifiable performance management of IT projects and policies is needed. Thus, the government developed its informatization evaluation system and has reinforced it. And Ministry of National Defense (MND) continues to strive for the settlement of the informatization performance evaluation system as well. According to Defense Informatization Law which was legislated in 2011, informatization policies should be assessed annually through informatization policy evaluation system in terms of their enforcement and outcome. However, informatization policy evaluation has not carried out since its pilot enforcement just after the legislation of the law. Hence, we conducted informatization policy evaluation aimed at performance investigation of 31 policies in '14~'18 Defense Informatization Master Plan. We sophisticated the current informatization policy system and we provide guidelines and tools to support the development of performance goal and indicators for each of the policies. Then, the policies were assessed by the evaluation committee we organized for our study, and we analyzed the problems we tackled in the whole process of evaluation and provided proposals for effectiveness enhancement of defense informatization evaluation system. The proposals will be meaningful for performance management in defense informatization sector and in public informatization sector as well.

• Water for future
• /
• v.54 no.5
• /
• pp.71-82
• /
• 2021

• (The)Korea Educational Review
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.101-133
• /
• 2017

This Study aims to evaluate teacher policy in the Park Administration and to suggest tasks based on the results. To attain the aim, it describes overall teacher policy process in Park Administration and evaluates teacher policy based on the criteria which was driven from the CIPP model. The conclusions are summarized as follows. First, the environmental suitability of the situation assessment was met in general. The reason for this was that the teacher policy of the Park Geun-hye government was introduced reflecting changes in the environment and demands of policy stakeholders. The validity and feasibility of the policy objective of the input evaluation were not satisfied. There were deficiencies in the objectives of the policy measures. The objectives of the measures were not linked to the policy objectives. The budget necessary for policy enforcement were not secured. In future policy design, efforts should be made to examine whether the policy goals are valid, to secure resources necessary for policy implementation and to increase the feasibility of policies. The procedural rationality of the process evaluation and the suitability of the means were not met. Discussion with the interest group was omitted, it was not clear whether the implementation of the policy was linked to the policy goal. In the future, it will be necessary to focus on procedures such as communication and collaboration with stakeholders, to make immediate revisions in case of problems. The effectiveness and satisfaction of the output evaluation were low. Because the validity of the policy objectives, the suitability of the means, and procedural rationality were not satisfied. In the future, it will be necessary to systematically design policies and communicate with stakeholders in the execution process to prevent policy failures and actively.

• Survey Research
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.57-79
• /
• 2010

This study evaluated the policy performance of i) Public Notice of Critical Information, ii) Substantiation of Facts in Labeling and Advertising, iii) Temporary Injunctions, and iv) Advertisement Correcting Misrepresented Facts, which were main policies belonged to Fair Labeling and Advertising Act(hereinafter referred to as "FLA Act"). The data was collected by visiting 76 persons personally, who were consumer policy and law experts, labeling and advertising staffs of corporations, and persons in charge of policies including public officials dealing with consumer policies at Korea Fair Trade Commission, while using a structured questionnaire at the same time. The survey was performed to examine the general policy performance and evaluation the results of FLA Act by evaluation methods. The results of the analysis are comprehensively summarized as follows. There were differences in the ranking of policies evaluated by labeling and advertising staffs of corporations and persons in charge of policies according to evaluation methods, and, in Simple Evaluation, higher scores were gained compared to Weighted Evaluation which reflected weighted values or Fuzzy Evaluation. The result shows that evaluation results can vary in policy performance evaluation according to evaluation methods.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.44 no.4
• /
• pp.303-331
• /
• 2010

With the full execution of the Comprehensive Library Advancement Plan(2009~2013), related bodies and participants, including national administrative agencies and local government, are increasing and the policy environments are intricately being expanded as well. However, there has been insufficient research on the general aspects of library policies to analyze and evaluate the current circumstances. The objective of this study is to analyze both the problems and suggestions in the areas that need improvements implementing this comprehensive plan. Accordingly, we designed a formative model for evaluating the policy process relating to the comprehensive plan, and then modified and supplemented the developed plan based on the Delphi method utilized by library policy experts. We conducted an empirical evaluation of library policy officials who have established and implemented the comprehensive plan. We then used the evaluation results to assess the effects of the factors regarding the accomplishments reached each policy stage.