• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 1995.10a
• /
• pp.240-243
• /
• 1995

최근에 들어와 퍼스는 인지과학적 관점에서 몇몇 영미철학자들의 각별한 관심을 끌고있다. 그러나 퍼스의 기호학과 현상론의 기본 바탕이 현대 인지과학의 노선과 그렇게 쉽사리 일치가 될 것 같지는 않다. 본 발표에서 논자는 퍼스와 인지과학의 관계를 본격적으로 탐구하기 위한 준비작업으로서 기호와 사고의 관계에 대한 퍼스의 이론을 그의 초기 논문들의 분석에 기초하여 비교적 선명하게 정리해보고자 한다. 발표 초반부에서 먼저 퍼스의 프래그매티시즘의 본질을 규정하고 이어서 기호학과의 관련성을 해명한 후, 기호와 인지의 관계를 밝혀보고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2021.01a
• /
• pp.335-336
• /
• 2021

디자인 패턴은 클래스와 객체를 활용한 23가지의 개발자 의도를 만족시켜주는 최선의 실천법들을 정리한 것이다. 디자인 패턴은 설계 경험과 객체지향 패러다임의 기반 지식들을 필요하므로 실질적인 패턴 학습에 어려움이 있다. 디자인 패턴 학습에 대한 도움을 제시해 줄 수 있는 가이드라인으로 기술 습득 모델에 활용하는 드라이퍼스 모델을 적용하는 것을 제안하고자 한다. 드라이퍼스 단계별 모델을 기반으로 단계 별 디자인 패턴 학습 단계를 제시한다.

• 기호학연구
• /
• no.54
• /
• pp.7-36
• /
• 2018

Michael Polanyi's idea of tacit knowledge came from the realization that scientific objectivity and critical philosophy had become too restrictive for philosophy, especially in the realm of meaning, which is beyond positivistic proof and contains more non-critical elements than critical ones. In social life, people still share certain kinds of knowledge and beliefs which they obtain without making or learning those explicitly. Contemplating the role and significance of tacit knowledge, he called for a post-critical philosophy that integrates the realm of meaning and thereby appreciates the intertwined nature of tacit and explicit knowledge. Polanyi's position towards skepticism and doubt shows similarities with Charles S. Peirce's thinking about the relationship between belief and doubt. Although Peirce's semeiotics stands firmly in the tradition of critical philosophy, he affirms that doubt cannot be a constant state of mind and only belief can form a basis for a specific way of life. Polanyi's approach differs from Peirce's by focusing on the impossibility of scientific knowledge based solely on principles and precision, and his emphasis on the crucial role of the community of scientists. Nevertheless, the deeper implications of Peirce's contemplations on belief and doubt have myriad ramifications on the philosophy of science as well as the sociology of science.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.152
• /
• pp.59-79
• /
• 2019

The main purpose of this paper is to critically examine the intractable problems of Peirce's notion of 'symbol' as a higher and perfect mode of sign, and present a more appropriate account of the higher status of symbol from an experientialist perspective. Peirce distinguished between icon, index, and symbol, and suggested symbol to be a higher mode of sign, in that it additionally requires "interpretation." Within Peirce's picture, the matter of interpretation is to be explained in terms of "interpretant," while icon or index are not. However, Peirce's conception of "interpretant" itself remains fraught with intractable opacities, thereby leaving the nature of symbol in a misty conundrum. Drawing largely on the experientialist account of the nature and structure of symbolic experience, I try to explicate the complexity of symbol in terms of "the symbolic mapping." According to experientialism, our experience consists of two levels, i.e., physical and symbolic. Physical experience can be extended to symbolic level largely by means of "symbolic mapping," and yet is strongly constrained by physical experience. Symbolic mapping is the way in which we map part of certain physical experience onto some other area, thereby understanding the other area in terms of the mapped part of the physical experience. According to this account, all the signs, icon, index, and symbol a la Peirce, are constructed by way of symbolic mapping. While icon and index are constructed by mapping physical level experience onto some signifier(i.e. Peirce's "representamen"), symbol is constructed by mapping abstract level experience onto some signifier. Considering the experientialist account that abstract level of experience is constructed by way of symbolic mapping of physical level of experience, the symbolic mapping of abstract level of experience onto some other area is a secondary one. Thus, symbol, being constructed by way of secondary or more times mapping, becomes a higher level sign. This analysis is based on the idea that explaining the nature of sign is a matter of explaining that symbolic experience, leaving behind Peirce's realist conception of sign as a matter of an event or state of affairs out there. In conclusion, I suggest that this analysis will open up new possibilities for a more appropriate account of the nature of signs, beyond Peirce's complicated riddles.

• The Korea Beekeeping Bulletin
• /
• s.307
• /
• pp.44-48
• /
• 2006

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.461-481
• /
• 2009

The semiotic approach to the mathematics education has been studied in last 20 years by PME, ICME conferences. New cultural developments in multi-media, digital documents and digital arts and cultures may influence mathematical education and teaching and learning activities. Hence semiotical interest in the mathematics education research and practice will be increasing. In this paper the basic ideas of semiotics, such as Peirce triad and Saussure's dyad, are introduced with some mathematical applications. There is some similarities between traditional research topics for concept, representation and social construction in mathematics education research and semiotic approach topics for the same subjects. some semiotic applications for an arithmetic problem for work, induction, deduction and abduction syllogisms with respect to Peirce's triad, its meaning in scientific discoveries and learning in geometry and symmetry.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.4 no.3
• /
• pp.171-178
• /
• 2018

Man is confronted with a lot of unknowable phenomena in his life. With the passage of time, man has interpreted the world by the accumulation of experience and development of thought. In the early days of the civilization when all the phenomena was not explained in a scientific way, man was dependent of the psycho-cultural interpretation by the accumulation of experience. Folk-Belief is one of the psycho-cultural interpretation about the nature. If Folk-Belief is paraphrased in a semiotic way, it is as follows : 'the traditional expression which believes that one or several sign and condition show one or several effects.' In this respect, Folk-Belief is the interpretation about the nature, man and society, as it were, the world. Folk-Belief is folkloristic semiotics. This article intends to clarify the process of Folk-Belief formation process. To investigate the Folk-Belief formation process, this article regards Folk-Belief as an interpretant which is the term from the semiotic theory of C. S. Peirce. Peirce explains the incessant semiosis that sign brings forth sign through the trichotomy relation among sign - object - interpretant. Folk-Belief is explained by the general characteristics of interpretant of Peirce when we regard Folk-Belief as an interpretant. By Peirce, Folk-Belief is 'something which believes that human mind represents something about some phenomena' The category of 'some phenomena' is included in a range of semiotics, we can look into Folk-Belief in a semiotic way.

• 기호학연구
• /
• no.54
• /
• pp.205-224
• /
• 2018

This research is to investigate the way to combine Peirce's typology of signs with architectural design. A new diagram is suggested to ensure the continuity of Peirce's typology, by rearranging and reconstructing the well known inverted triangle diagram showing the structure of the typology. The new diagram is easier to understand the organization of the typology, by showing the linkages between sign types and their relationships with other types. A way to adapt the new diagram to architectural design for the purpose of representing typology as well as ensuring model growth as semiotic model for architectural design model. The new model is organized of three sign clusters, sinsign cluster, legisign cluster, and symbolic cluster. They are interrelated through successive inclusion and case inclustion. The new model is organized of threefold layers. The first layer is internal structure of each cluster. The second is interrelation between cluster. The third is mediation of symbolic cluster between sinsign cluster and legisign cluster. This paper investigate and demonstrate the possibility of adaptation of the new model in architectural design. It has been argued that the theoretical basis of sign typology is adaptable to architectural design by principle. More future research issues are discussed.

• Journal of Korean Electronics
• /
• v.23 no.12
• /
• pp.55-60
• /
• 2003

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Interior Design Conference
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.173-178
• /
• 2008

Flagship store has rapidly come into being is the typical tool of brand-communication between enterprises and consumers. Flagstore comprised of a lot of tastes delivers brand-image and builds brand- identity. this research on the ground of Semiotics by Pierce, examined closely the connections between two tastes and analyzed the brand-image had prodused through tastes. The method study restricts the four analytical subjects of the fashion-brands have successfully built brand-image and identity and arranges each brand - identity and constructive strategy. After that, it analyzes the examples of Flagstore on the ground of Semiotics. The purpose of this research focuses how the tastes will have occurred on the Flagstore will express and analyze the brand -identities and presents a methodology it will be able to designe.