• 중국학논총
• /
• no.65
• /
• pp.235-264
• /
• 2020

本文稿旨在就世界经济两大支柱体美国和中国在过去2年间持续的贸易纷争的背景和性质, 发展过程以及对两国经济的影响等进行概括总结。与此同时, 本文还将探索贸易摩擦作为G2之间争夺霸权的战争, 是否会波及到日益紧张的南中国海以及台湾海峡的局势。为此, 本文还将就以2008年世界金融危机为起点飞跃发展的中国, 与在冷战后维持单极体制的美国相对抗进而逐渐确立新两国体制的过程, 以及G2格局出现以后, 美, 中新冷战格局形成的过程等进行研究。

• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.22 no.12
• /
• pp.59-63
• /
• 2020

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2012.10a
• /
• pp.214-218
• /
• 2012

China has definitely been arising as the world's most powerful nation. By looking at general national power it seems that China's national prestige in 2011 is already way beyond Asia and even it closely catches up with the United States which is the most powerful nation over the world. The United states-centered world political order has begun to struggle by China's growth. Moreover, there has been an earnest competition arisen for the east-Asia sea supremacy between previous U.S. hegemony and arising China's power. East-Asia's ocean is the stage for this strife and it grows more serious. At this point, South Korea, one of the east-Asia country seeking the nation's stability and prosperity through its ocean, has come under the influence of this strife among the super powers of the world. The Author will closely examine the backgrounds and future opportunities of military competition between U.S. and China to analyze the influence of the power competition towards the security status of east-Asia especially South Korea.

• Journal of Space Technology and Applications
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.146-168
• /
• 2022

Witnessing current military conflicts in South China Sea and Eastern Europe, most defense analysts evaluate one of the most serious security threat toward the US is coming from the superpower competitions with Russia and China. The main means for such super power hegemonic competitions is military power and space power is a key enabler to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of military employment. Reflecting above circumstances, the space hegemonic competition between the Unites States and China is spreading into all aspects of national powers. Under such an environment, R.O.K needs to significantly develop national space power to preserve life and assets of people in space. On the other hand, the R.O.K has a lot of limitations in launching space assets into orbits by land-based space rockets due to its geographic locations. The limitation of rocket launching direction, the failure to secure a significant area enough to secure safety and the limitation to secure open area enough to build associated facilities are among them. On this paper, I will suggest the need to build the 2nd space rocket launching site after analyzing a lot of short-falls the current 'Naro' space center face, compared to those of advanced space powers around the world.

• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.22 no.8
• /
• pp.25-35
• /
• 2020

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2021.11a
• /
• pp.288-289
• /
• 2021

4차산업혁명과 함께 기존 산업구조가 급속하게 변화하고 기술패권주의가 심화되면서, 기술 패권의 승패에 따라 국가의 글로벌 경쟁력이 크게 좌우된다. 세계 주요국들은 기술경쟁력 확보를 위해 기술혁신과 기술연대의 경쟁을 벌이고 있고, 우리나라도 이러한 동향 속에서 적극적인 R&D 연구 투자와 정책적 지원을 통해 미래 산업 분야의 기술경쟁력 확보를 위해 노력하고 있다. 현재 중국에 의한 기술 탈취나 인력 유출이 발생하고 있고, 이는 산업경쟁력 상실로 이어져 막대한 경제적 피해를 야기할 수 있다. 기술경쟁력을 잃지 않기 위해, 반드시 우리의 산업기술 보호 수단도 마련되어야 한다. 선제적으로 중요한 산업기술을 적절히 식별하여 중요도에 따라 보호수단을 이행하는 것이 산업기술 보호의 시작일 것이다. 이에 따라, 본 논문에서는 지식그래프와 임베딩 모델을 활용하여 우리나라의 핵심산업분야 중 하나인 반도체 분야의 기술문서를 중요도에 따라 수직적으로 분류할 수 있는 방안에 대해 연구하고자 한다.

• Electronics and Telecommunications Trends
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.47-57
• /
• 2023

The competition for technological supremacy is unfolding in the high-tech field, and quantum computing can be determinant for economic and security ripple effects. The United States and China, leaders in quantum computing, have developed this field through adequate policies. The United States has fostered quantum computing through government policies and competition among private companies, while China has secured world-class technology through large-scale government investment and attracting foreign talent. In quantum computing, securing talented people is essential to guarantee independent technology development regarding academic attributes and security. We analyze quantum computing policies in the United States and China on a timeline and determine their policy trends. In addition, the policies for securing talent in these countries are reviewed, and the policy effects are compared based on literature analysis. Through the analysis of policy cases between the United States and China, bilateral policy implications for Korea are delineated.

• Maritime Security
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.1-30
• /
• 2020

The study started with the question, "Is Japan's normalization of nationalization a return to militarism?" Therefore, in order to analyze this, the characteristics of the international system after the inauguration of the Japanese Empire during World War I and World War II and the Abe's 2nd Cabinet in contemporary Japan were compared. Through this, there were some differences in the characteristics of the international system of the two periods, and as a result, it was intended to derive the differences between the two examples. During the prewar period of World War I, the militaristic Japanese Empire suffered great damage from the national pride of being the only power in Asia through the Paris Enhancement Conference, the Washington Navy Treaty, and the London Navy Treaty. However, the Western powers with colonies in Asia still existed in the region, so it was not possible to turn them into immediate power expansion. Meanwhile, World War II broke out in Europe. As a result, the Western powers had to focus on the whole of Europe, and the militaristic Japanese empire became a regional hegemony without missing the international system characteristic of "the hegemony." Unlike in the past militarism, Japan's case of pursuing common nationalization since 2012 has been carried out in the order of Northeast Asia in the composition of the "cold war" new cold war. In particular, Japan is attempting to transform itself into a normal state to strengthen the US-Japan alliance on a self-reliant level due to the lack of quantitative military power compared to the neighboring countries.

• Journal of International Area Studies (JIAS)
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.477-498
• /
• 2010

The Reasons which Rose Revolution, Orange Revolution, and Lemon Revolution had been much argued in international society are as follows: Firstly, the important fact was that authoritarian governments in Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan were collapsed not by physical violences and military forces, but by unblooded civil movements, so called Civil Revolution. And it is also called as Colorful Revolution. Secondly, during the advance of three Civil Revolution, hegemony conflicts between Russia and western powers including US appeared. In fact, tensions between the two countries, Russia and US had already occurred in Post-soviet region after dissolution of Soviet Union. Thirdly, as a result of three Civil Revolution, there were built up fullest attentions in international societies about the possibilities of other civil revolutions, that is to say, 'Colorful Revolution' among the countries which were the republics of former USSR. In this respect, in this investigation of Lemon Revolution in Kyrgyzstan as like Rose Revolution in Georgia and Orange Revolution in Ukraine, this article examined the roles and supports toward NGOs of Western powers including US. To my opinion, it is likely that NGOs, with powerful sponsors, become political bodies working through networks and media rather than being rooted in civil society and acting on behalf of citizens. And that powerful sponsors, directly or indirectly financed by outside governments, become involved in political activities. So NGOs have been important roles in promoting civil revolution as political agencies and more political instruments of foreign governments. In the long run, through the Colorful Revolution, it is better to understand that hegemony struggle is beginning between external concerned superpowers including US and Russia, rather than hegemony struggle having directly broke out.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.26 no.2 s.285
• /
• pp.39-66
• /
• 1993

과학기술의 혁신이야말로 오늘 우리가 당면한 경제패권 무한경쟁시대에서 살아 남을 수 있는 유일한 길이다. 이런 면에서 국가 과학기술정책은 대단히 중요한 뜻을 갖는다. 우리의 과학기술혁신을 이끌어 갈 ①과학기술처②상공부③농립수산부④체신부⑤동력자원부⑥환경처⑦건설부⑧보건사회부⑨교육부⑩국방부 등 10개 주요 관련부처가 갖고 있는 2000년대 선진한국 건설을 위한 과학기술개발 복안은 어떤 것일까. 최 일선에서 실무를 관장하고 있는 담당자를 통해 해부해 본다.