• 발명특허
• /
• v.36 no.10
• /
• pp.12-19
• /
• 2011

우리나라의 주요 경제 교역국 중 하나인 영국의 특허소송 체계, 특허법원 및 소송절차에 대해 살펴 봄으로써 우리나라 발명가와 기업이 영국 및 유럽에서의 특허 분쟁 관련 경쟁력을 어떻게 확보해야 하는지 알아보자.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.36 no.9
• /
• pp.14-19
• /
• 2011

우리나라의 주요 경제 교역국 중 하나인 영국의 특허소송 체계, 특허법원 및 소송절차에 대해 살펴 봄으로써 우리나라 발명가와 기업이 영국 및 유럽에서의 특허 분쟁 관련 경쟁력을 어떻게 확보해야 하는지 알아보자.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.31 no.5 s.359
• /
• pp.28-29
• /
• 2006

특허청 산업재산권분쟁조정위원회 '특허분쟁해결의 새로운 대안으로 떠올라'/ 해외에서 지재권 침해소송, 특허청이 도와 드립니다/ 국유특허 무료로 사용하세요

• Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.102-108
• /
• 2021

In this research, we would like to understand the measures to be taken in the event of a patent dispute by Chinese companies that are growing rapidly and competing with Korean companies in the global market, at a time when the fusion and compounding technology are accelerating. For this reason, the patent dispute countermeasures shown in the previous research were derived through deep interviews with experts, and a questionnaire survey was conducted with patent practitioners of Chinese companies. As a result of the analysis, the importance of cross licensing, patent invalidation proceedings, proceedings through collaboration with other companies, royalty payments, and patent invalidation proceedings in the case of a patent dispute in the Chinese industry is high. Shown. The results of this study provide practical guidelines to help corporate patent practitioners understand the best course of action in the event of a patent dispute, respond in a timely manner, and save time and money. It seems that it can be done.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.117-125
• /
• 2015

In case that they do not have counterstrategies ready for patent disputes in advance, they would not be able to survive competitions or would fall behind in the market. Most of domestic companies are not equipped with appropriate counterstrategies, and there are only few studies on the countermeasures for patent disputes. Thus, this study examined counterstrategies for patent disputes drawn from cases of smartphone patent disputes and preceding researches, and conducted interviews and surveys with patent experts and company executives to grasp their opinions about the effectiveness of countermeasures for patent disputes related to the smartphone field. As for analysis tool, the Delphi method is selected that is usually used for analyzing relatively a small number of expert opinions. As a result of interviewing patent experts, effective countermeasures turned out to be cross licensing, counter-suit, and patent invalidation suit, in order, and as a result of surveys with company executives, they turned out to be patent invalidation suit, counter-suit, cross licensing, suit through solidarity, and loyalty agreement, in order. It is anticipated that the study results could be used for smartphone manufacturing companies and ICT companies to establish counterstrategies for patent disputes.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.37 no.1
• /
• pp.62-71
• /
• 2012

중국 최고인민법원은 '특허권 침해분쟁 소송사건 심리에 적용하는 법률에 관한 약간의 문제 해석'에서, 특허청구범위의 해석, 특허실시행위, 비침해항변, 침해배상액의 산정, 생산방법의 추정, 비침해확인의 소에 대하여 규정하고 있다. 이 사법해석은 2010년 1월 1일부터 시행되어 지식재산권 침해분쟁을 운영하는 기준으로서 활용되므로, 각 규정의 내용 및 의미를 제공하고자 한다.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.36 no.12
• /
• pp.22-23
• /
• 2011

글로벌 특허 전쟁 현황, 국내 지재권법 제도 실태, 지재권법 제도 해외 사례(영국 일본 미국) 특허침해 소송에서의 변리사 역할을 알아보자.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.49-72
• /
• 2015

The patent war between Apple and Samsung which started in the year of 2011 presents us a good example of a multifaceted technological strategies, frequently found in high-tech industries. The patent litigation represents a competitive structure, while the patent citation of counterpart's technology demonstrates the underlying cooperative relationship between two leading firms in smart-phone industry. However, the previous studies have mostly concentrated on one aspect in inter-firm relationship, providing only a partial aspect of technological management issues often faced by high-tech companies today. We also have a limited understanding on the technological trajectory or how the core technology evolve over time in high-tech industry where technological knowledge is the main source of competitive advantage. To overcome the drawbacks in the previous studies, we examine the coopetitive nature of inter-organizational relationship with simultaneous perspectives of competition and cooperation in smart-phone industry. To this end, this study analyzes patent-litigation for revealing the competitive nature and patent-citation network for the cooperative nature by utilizing patent citation data. By doing so, we identify the specific patterns of technological knowledge flows and the direction of technological strategy and the relevant policy under the circumstance of coopetition ecosystem.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.36 no.12
• /
• pp.40-46
• /
• 2011

오라클은 지난해 자바기술과 특허를 보유한 썬마이트로시스템즈를 인수하면서, 구글의 안드로이드가 자바 특허기술을 침해했다며 구글을 상대로 고소장을 제출하였다. 오라클은 이번 특허소송에서 자바표준기술에 대한 특허 7건을 구글이 침해했다고 주장하고 있다.

• The Inventors News
• /
• no.22
• /
• pp.13-13
• /
• 2004

중국 내 해적판 대량유통 강력단속 촉구 - 미네베아와 일본전산, 특허분쟁 일다 - 마이크로소프트 인터트러스트 테크놀로지와 소송 타결