• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.21 no.7
• /
• pp.168-175
• /
• 2020

Recently, there has been an increasing need to expand the supply of renewable energy as a solution to greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, as a measure to promote domestic renewable energy investment and gradual expansion, this study analyzed the investment value of renewable energy projects utilizing the unoccupied spaces of public enterprise's facilities and presented a strategic decision-making framework to support efficient national land development and government measures. The NPV was estimated to be 286 million won if the expansion of the facility was not considered, but it is reasonable to postpone the expansion decision because the value of -130 million won was calculated if the expansion was considered. On the other hand, the real-option value was estimated to be 444 million won, taking SMP uncertainty, expansion, and abandonment options into account, and an additional value of 288 million won was calculated from an analysis of the expansion project using the existing NPV analysis.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.137-157
• /
• 2013

Korean shipping industry is ranked the fifth largest in the world in terms of deadweight tonnage after Greece, Japan, Germany and China with 55 million DWT as of year 2011, and its size of foreign exchange earning marked 30 billion US dollars. In respect of volume of seaborne trade, it has handled 99% of import and export cargoes. Korean shipping fleets have increased from 420 to 979 ships between year 2003 to year 2011. By reviewing through the relating literatures, it has been found that Shipping Funds under Ship Investment Company Act, and Tonnnage Tax System, worked as positive influences to increase the Korean shipping fleets. However, there is scant of research to examine the following two points: 1) weighing the decision making factors of ship investments for Korean shipping companies, and 2) weighing the influential factors of government shipping policies. In this respect, the aim of this study is to evaluate 8 decision making factors of ship investments for Korean shipping companies, and 8 influential factors of government shipping policies. For weighing the factors, the fuzzy methodology was adopted. As the results, for the side of decision making factors of ship investments, 'shipping market conditions and future prospects', 'ship's price and future prospects, and 'securing cargoes and future prospects' are ranked as top 3 factors. For government shipping policies side, 'shipping finance provided by lease companies', 'establishment of Korea Shipping Guarantee Fund', and 'establishment of Korea Shipping Finance Corporation' are verified as the important factors.

• Proceedings of the Technology Innovation Conference
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.237-248
• /
• 2004

투자성과평가에서 주요 이슈 중 하나는 최적의 투자규모, 즉 자원할당을 결정하는 것이다 기존연구에서는 서열모델, 평점모델, 경제성 모델, 포트폴리오 모델, 위험 분석 및 의사결정모델, 조직 의사결정모델 등 많은 모델들이 연구자들에 의해 제안되어 왔다. 시스템에서 성과측정은 시스템 설계와의 일치가 요구되므로, 자원할당도 시스템 설계와 연계되어 결정되어야 한다 그러나 자원할당방법에 대한 기존 연구는 대부분 자원할당모델의 개발에 중점을 두고 있으며, 모델 개발시에 시스템 설계에 대해 고려하고 있는 문헌은 거의 없다. 본 논문은 투자목표를 최대로 하기 위한 최적 자원할당방법에서 시스템 설계를 고려하기 위하여 시스템 설계분해개념에 기초한 자원할당방법의 절차와 유전자 알고리즘을 이용한 자원할당방법을 제안한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2004.10a
• /
• pp.521-524
• /
• 2004

본 연구에서는 개인의 투자행태 및 투자성향을 파악하기 위한 구조화된 설문지를 개발하고 이를 이용하여 개인 투자자의 투자의사결정에 영향을 미치는 요인을 파악하였다. 연구결과, 개인 투자자의 연령, 성별, 연간소득, 투자경험, 손실 허용수준, 선호투자상품 등이 투자성향 및 자산 배분행태에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.117-125
• /
• 2017

People believe that they make a rational decision. But the results of behavioral economics research show that people make a emotional decision at many times. The perception of fairness is one of the example in emotional decision. Sometimes people give up their monetary profit and revenge counterpart when they feel unfair. So the perception of fairness is very important. Two experiment was conducted. In experiment 1, researcher studied the effect of the pre-investment cost in perception of fairness. The result showed people who had pre-investment cost thought more unfair but were more likely to continue prior decision. In experiment 2, researcher studied the effect of type of CEO and message frame in perception of fairness. The results showed that people thought the proposal was more unfair when CEO was son of founder and message was gain and loss framing message.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2015.05a
• /
• pp.271-272
• /
• 2015

정부의 ICT R&D는 전체산업 관점과 거시적 목적 지향적인 R&D 추진체계에서 필요한 R&D 목적달성을 위해 R&D투자재원의 효율적 배분이 매우 중요한 기능이 된다. 즉, R&D재원배분에 대한 다양한 기준들이 존재할 수 있으며, 이러한 상충적 배분기준들 사이에 객관적이고 효율적인 재원투자의 우선순위와 가중치가 기본적으로 필요하게 된다. R&D계획수립과 지원 분야선정을 위한 방법론으로 보편적으로 사용되고, 현장적용에 객관성을 확보하고 있는 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 모형을 통해 상충적 다중의사결정에 발생하는 기준의 선호에 대한 쌍대비교를 통해 객관적 선택기준과 대안적 선택에 대한 의사결정 프레임워크를 제공해준다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 정부의 ICT산업경쟁력 제고 목적달성을 위한 투자부문과 기술분야에 대한 실증적인 의사결정구조와 재원배분안을 제시하고자 한다.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.31-44
• /
• 2020

Accelerators that invest in early startups, as well as nursery and overall management, have recently emerged as "key players" in the startup ecosystem. This can be proved by the case where the number of domestic accelerators registered in the Korean Ministry of SMEs and Startups has recently reached 208. Accelerators provide the necessary education for early-stage companies, including guidance for a certain period of time, and support startups in ways such as demo days to attract subsequent investment after the seed investment. There is not much research in academia about what factors impact on these accelerators when making investment decisions at the time of seed investment. In this study, we checked the meaning and function of the accelerator and tried to analyze what factors affect on accelerators when making a decision to invest in startups. The research method is based on a literature survey of previous studies on investment decision-making factors of venture capital and angel investors, and a lens model and judgment analysis method through empirical research targeting 43 accelerator investment decision-makers. Empirical analysis shows that accelerators have three of the key factors to consider when choosing the first startup to invest and educate; entrepreneurs' entrepreneurial traits, their product and service expertise and a potential return on success. This will provide an opportunity for early startups to gain strategic access to accelerators when they need money or need a structured educational program. Also, the results obtained through this research will be a kind of guideline for startups to attract accelerators' investment. The significance of this study is that discriminatory evidence was presented on the accelerator determinants of investment, and it would be highly suggestive to startups and related public institutions.

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2009.11a
• /
• pp.373-379
• /
• 2009

최근 기업들은 증가하는 IT 투자가 기업 가치 증대에 얼마나 기여하고 있는지를 합리적으로 검증 할 수 있는 방법을 모색하고 있다. 이사회 및 최고 경영자는 IT 투자 대상의 우선 순위 결정이 투명하고 합리적인 기준에 기반하여 결정하고자 하나. IT 투자 대상의 우선 순위 결정을 위한 기준은 매우 다양하고 표준화 되어 있지 않기 때문에 합리적인 투명한 결과를 얻기는 매우 어렵다. 본 연구에서는 기업들이 IT 투자 우선순위를 선정하기 위한 기준은 어떠한 것들이 있으며, 각각의 기준들에 대한 가중치를 어떠한지를 계층적으로 분석하여 IT 투자 대상의 우선 순위 평가 모델을 제시한다. 이 평가 모델을 활용하여 다양한 이해 관련자들이 IT 투자 우선 순위를 결정함에 있어 합리적이고 투명한 의사 결정이 가능하게 한다.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.25-41
• /
• 2014

While previous studies on Crowd funding mainly focused on the plan and policy of the introduction of Crowd funding, this study classified Investment Decision Making criterion and proposed the significance of each factor, leading to results that can help investors practically. According to the analysis, (1) physical resource in business is the most important criterion to be considered as the way for investor to objectively make decisions on business model, (2) although people pay attention to the managerial capabilities of business, the creativity of business model is not being paid much attention. The result of this study can objectively determine investment decision making on business model thought a quantitative standard of judgment. Moreover, an environment should be built for healthy decision making which is based on business model instead of only product, and it is necessary to have institutional framework to enable new companies to have healthy competition with existing companies through creative business model.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.20 no.5
• /
• pp.45-54
• /
• 2002

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been widely used as a comprehensive evaluation method since it can include various evaluation standards of both the public and private sectors. It also provides the objective mathematics to process subjective and Personal preferences of an individual or a group in making a decision. This study tried to use AHP to determine the priority of roads investment, considering various effects in a hierarchy such as environmental effects, residential life, and regional development which has not been treated explicitly. As a case study, roads in Gyeongsangbukdo province have been chosen for the evaluation in this research. For the application, it used relative measurements to estimate the weight of upper level structure, and absolute measurement for low level structure instead of pairwise comparisons.