• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.15 no.10
• /
• pp.103-111
• /
• 2017

This study was performed with a view to examine the nature and difference of EFA(Exploratory Factor Analysis) and CFA(Confirmatory Factor Analysis), and to compare the analysis process and result of EFA and CFA with the same data. The result of empirical analysis was as follows. Meanwhile, p.1, p.3 was removed owing to hampering the convergent validity in EFA, p.3 was removed owing to hampering the discriminent validity in CFA. EFA was reduction process of muti measurement variables to a few factor, but CFA was understanding and confirmatory process of measurement and latent variables' relation. Eventually, this study showed that EFA and CFA used different methology, thus the different outcomes appeared although using the same data, and implicated resonable application of methology according to given data.

• Proceedings of the Korean Association for Survey Research Conference
• /
• 2006.12a
• /
• pp.239-262
• /
• 2006

이 연구는 Hewitt과 Flett(1991c), 이기종(2006)이 제안한 완벽주의 척도 연구모형의 타당도를 확인적 요인분석을 통해 검증하고, Hewitt과 Flett(1991c)이 개발한 완벽주의 척도의 문항이 몇 개의 요인으로 구성되는지 알아보기 위해 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 확인적 요인분석 결과 Hewitt과 Flett(1991c), 이기종(2006)이 각각 제안한 연구모형과 수집된 자료가 잘 합치하지 않았다. 따라서 자료에 모형이 잘 맞도록 모형을 수정해야 하고, 의미 없는 자유모수가 모형에서 나타나지 않도록 모형을 다시 설정해야 함을 알 수 있다. 또한 Hewitt과 Flett(1991c)이 개발한 완벽주의 척도의 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 완벽주의 척도의 각 문항들이 완벽주의를 측정하는데 있어서 단일요인으로 제 기능을 하기 보다는 여러 문항에 걸쳐 공통요인이 존재함을 알 수 있다. 따라서 확인적 요인분석과 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 Hewitt과 Flett(1991c)이 개발한 완벽주의 척도가 측정하는 요인은 3개 요인으로 설명될 수 없다고 판단된다. 그러므로 Hewitt과 Flett(1991c)이 개발한 완벽주의 척도의 측정 문항이 수정되어야 하고, 나가서 우리의 사회 문화적 실정을 고려한 완벽주의 척도의 개발이 시급함을 알 수 있다.

• The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.67-74
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is identifying variables that affect to learners' preference toward specific e-learning programs, using an exploratory factor analysis(EFA) method. We extract common factors that explain the correlations among variables. In the result, 8 factors were identified as main influential factors: e-learning program design(1st factor), the purpose of e-learning use(2nd factor), social and cultural issues(3rd factor), demographics(4th factor), organizational needs(5th factor), impacts of e-learning(6th factor), e-learning management(7th factor), and technical issue(8th factor).

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.53-66
• /
• 2008

This research is to the establishment of a conceptual framework that supports road characteristic classification from a new point of view in order to complement of the existing road functional classification and examine of traffic pattern. The road characteristic classification(RCC) is expected to use important performance criteria that produced a policy guidelines for transportation planning and operational management. For this study, the traffic data used the permanent traffic counters(PTCs) located within the national highway between 2002 and 2006. The research has described for a systematic review and assessment of how exploratory factor analysis should be applied from 12 explanatory variables. The optimal number of components and clusters are determined by interpretation of the factor analysis results. As a result, the scenario including all 12 explanatory variables is better than other scenarios. The four components is produced the optimal number of factors. This research made contributions to the understanding of the exploratory factor analysis for the road characteristic classification, further applying the objective input data for various analysis method, such as cluster analysis, regression analysis and discriminant analysis.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.16 no.9
• /
• pp.160-169
• /
• 2016

Self-Compassion(SCS) Scale is developed by Neff(2003a) and translated by Kim, Lee, Cho, Chae, Lee(2008). But, there is the limitation with validation SCS and Korean version Self-Compassion(K-SCS) performed in college students and the incoherence for the results of the scale's factor analysis in other countries. Therefore, this study examined the validity of factor structure in SCS based on data in 435 adult aged from 18 to 79. For this, we conducted exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA), and we examined the each adequacy of two-factor, tree-factor and six-factor model. The result of EFA supported six-factor and the result of CFA was the six factor model best as well.

• Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.259-282
• /
• 2020

This study examines the validity of the Filial Responsibility Scale-Adult (Past), developed by Jurkovic and Thirkield (1999), among Korean university students in their twenties. First, a preliminary scale consisting of 30 items was developed by translating the original scale into Korean and item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were conducted on 249 subjects. Based on the exploratory factor analysis, items in the emotional parentification factor were either deleted or included in the other remaining factors, resulting in a two-factor model containing 15 items. In order to confirm this, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on 318 independent subjects. As a result of a confirmatory factor analysis of the two competing models - the three-factor model consisting of 30 items based on the original scale and the two-factor(emotional experience and caring behavior) model consisting of 15 items gained as a result of the exploratory factor analysis - the two-factor model showed more suitable and the original scale was revised accordingly. The convergent validity, discriminant validity and predictive validity were all found to be satisfactory. Based on such results, implications, limitations and suggestions on follow-up studies are discussed.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.15 no.11
• /
• pp.374-385
• /
• 2015

This purpose of study is to develop a dyslexia check list for students in middle and high school. To ensure the contents validity, researching related studies was conducted, and then factors and items were made under the 5 experts advisory. The pilot test was done on 265 students who are in middle and high school. To obtain the reliability, SPSS 21,0 was conducted as exploratory factor analysis and to confirm the goodness of fit test, AMOS 7.0 was done as confirmatory factor analysis. The results of study are as below, firstly, 8 measure factors and 34 items were ensured. Secondly, in exploratory analysis, Crombach ${\alpha}=.920$ was obtained, it was high value. Thirdly. in confirmatory factor analysis, the absolute fit index : GFI=.920, RMR=.057, RMSEA=.062 and incremental fit index : CGI=.960, TLI=.977 were ensured. Above results, the developed measurement tool for students in middle and high school in this study was confirmed as a suitable one.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.11
• /
• pp.692-710
• /
• 2021

This study aimed to validate the Awareness of Age-Related Change (AARC) scale developed by Brothers et al. (2019) for the Korean elderly. This study took the elderly people in Seoul (over 65 years old) as participants to examine the aging perception of the elderly themselves. For this purpose, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) with two samples (sample 1: N = 185; sample 2: N = 215). EFA revealed and CFA confirmed a two-factor structure consisting of awareness of gains and awareness of losses. Specifically, the awareness of losses had two subfactors consisting of awareness of losses in health and awareness of losses in non-health, while the awareness of gains had no subfactor. Finally, we examined the relationship between AARC, attitudes toward own aging, and emotions then discussed the implication, limitations of this study, and future direction.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.989-1018
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 내 외부 환경, 혁신활동이 기업성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 파악하기 위해 탐색적 요인분석(Exploratory Factor Analysis), 군집분석(Cluster Analysis), 구조방정식모형(Structural Equation Modeling)을 이용하여 실증분석을 실시하였다. 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 7개의 요인이 추출하였으며, 추출된 요인을 기반으로 군집분석을 시도하였더니 총 4개의 군집(n=1,022)이 형성되었다. 군집 4개의 대해 구조방정식 모형을 활용하여 실증분석을 한 결과, 기술 경쟁 환경에 민감하며, 혁신적인 성향을 가진 군집1은 자체기술개발만이 기업성과에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 시장 환경에 민감하며, 내향적인 성향을 가진 군집2는 자체기술개발과 공동연구를 통해서만 기업성과에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 경쟁적인 환경에 민감하며, 혁신적이고 정부/관련기관과의 협력적 성향을 가진 군집3은 공동연구 그리고 매개변수인 정부지원프로그램 활용을 통해 기업성과에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 기술도입은 기업성과에 부정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 개방적이고 외부협력적 성향이 강한 군집4는 자체기술개발과 매개변수인 네트워크 활용 및 정부지원프로그램 활용이 기업성과에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2020.11a
• /
• pp.131-153
• /
• 2020

'기업 생태계'에서 '유니콘'이란 표현법은 2013년 'Aileen Lee'에 의해 명명된 이래, 특히 한국에서 '스타트업 생태계'의 국제적 수준 비교의 차원에서 활발하게 다루어졌다. 정부 차원에서는 이를 정책적 목표로 설정하여, '2022년까지 유니콘 기업 20개 목표'를 제시한 바 있다. 이와 같이 '유니콘 클럽 기업'에 대한 현상이 정책적 목표 차원에서 다루어지며, 대중적으로 더욱 확산된데 반해, 이에 대한 실체적 및 본질적 이해 목적의 학술적 연구는 충분치 못하였다. 본 연구는, 첫째, 2018년 기준 '유니콘 클럽' 기업 326개 및 2019년 479개의 기업을 대상으로 이들의 특성을 심층적이고 다면적으로 분석하였다. 그동안 주로 국가 별 '유니콘 기업' 수 및 산업 분류 기준 일반현황 중심의 대중적 소개가 주된 내용이었다. 그러나, 본 연구는 투자자를 포함한 기초 현황을 상세 분석하였고, 사례분석을 포함한 질적 탐색을 수행하였다. 또한 군집분석, 판별분석, 다층 회귀분석 등 양적 탐색을 함께 수행하였다. 개별기업의 '기업가 요인-산업(시장)환경 요인-자원 요인-전략 요인', 즉 'ERIS 모델'에 기반하여 그 특성을 살펴보았다. 둘째, 기업가치에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 앞서 분석한 특성 요인 및 투자자 특성과 연계하여 살펴보았다. 그리고 마지막으로는 이들을 토대로 '기업 생태계' 관점에서 유니콘 현상'을 바르게 이해하고, 또한 정책적 측면에서 이를 생산적으로 활용하는 방향을 제시하였다.