• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• 제16권12호
• /
• pp.51-60
• /
• 2018

This study would like to know the relationship among interpersonal competency based self-understanding and acceptance of others, self leadership, stress-coping and military adjustment. For this, 1289 military trainee in the army training station were surveyed. In results, The first, the acceptance of others did not have a significant effect on the perform-will, but had a significant effect on the job satisfaction and self leadership. The self-understanding had a significant effect on perform-will, job satisfaction and self leadership. The second, self leadership mediated between interpersonal competency and military adjustment. The third, in case of the perform-will, the moderating effect was showed in self leadership when the stress coping level was high. But in case of the job satisfaction, it was showed in both high group and low. Implications of this study is that the interpersonal competency based self-understanding and acceptance of others, self leadership and stress coping can be the positive potential variables on the military adjustment.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.97-136
• /
• 2006

비트겐슈타인의 규칙따르기 개념에 대한 올바른 이해는 그의 후기 철학의 궤적을 살피는데 있어서 중요하다. 비트겐슈타인의 규칙따르기 문제에 대해 회의적 해석으로 유명한 크립키는 "탐구"의 201절을 문제 삼으며 '역설'의 문제를 새로운 형식의 철학적 회의주의로 간주했다. 본 논문은 규칙의 역설에 대한 크립키의 논증이 비트겐슈타인의 관점과 무엇 때문에 충돌하는지를 밝히면서 그와 함께 비트겐슈타인이 '규칙의 역설'을 제시한 궁극적 이유를 규명하는데 있다. 규칙의 역설에 대한 크립키 논증의 의의와 한계를 비판적으로 다룸으로서 필자는 다음과 같은 점을 주장할 것이다. 비트겐슈타인에게 있어서 규칙은 우리들의 행동을 이끄는 지침의 역할을 하며, 규칙의 문제를 추론과 연관시켜 수학이 엄격한 규칙을 따르는 인간의 지적 활동이며, 규칙에 대한 비트겐슈타인의 관점은 귀납적 회의주의와 무관하다. 이런 맥락에서 비트겐슈타인을 회의주의자 혹은 상대주의자로 평가하는 것은 문제가 있다. 그런 점에서 비트겐슈타인은 오히려 어떤 이론이나 선입견에 사로잡히지 않은 봄의 방식을 강조한 철학자로 평가하는 것이 옳다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• 제16권7호
• /
• pp.410-422
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study intends that the contemporary university students would understand the importance and relationship of the Self-Expression as its appropriateness, the Self-Understanding and the Self-Accommodation as it is, and that it would conducive to enhance their Communication Capability and Accommodation to other's perspective on the base of these understandings. In accordance with the analyses of questioners and statistics as a methodology of this study, the tendency of the factors effective to the enhancement for the Communication Capability and the Accommodation to other's perspective will be found out and the meaning of the Self-Expression, the Self-Accommodation and the Self-Understanding will be analyzed by the standpoint of the enhancement of the Self-Competency. The result of this study reveals that a high distributed group for the Definitization of the Self-Conception is to have more the Self-Expression and the Self-Accommodation. As an enlightenment from this study, the Self-Expression and the Self-Accommodation shall have a mutual reliance and be influenced to the Accommodation of Other Person's Perspective. In case of the high distribution of the Self-Accommodation, where there is the both of the low distribution of the Self-Expression and the Self-Accommodation, the Accommodation of Other Person's Perspective is high. However, if there is the higher of the Self-Expression and the Self-Accommodation, there influences the better enhancement of the Communication-Capability, and there no effect to their mutual reliance. This study enlightens when it becomes at the stage of the Self-Accommodation, a respectable listening from others makes to accommodate other as it is and when it is wanted to raise the Communication Capability, it is required to improve the capability through the Self-Expression together with the Self-Accommodation.

• KLA journal
• /
• 제53권6호
• /
• pp.24-29
• /
• 2012

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.163-196
• /
• 2017

Wittgenstein declares in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus that he resolved Russell's Paradox. According to him, a function cannot be its own argument. If we assume that a function F(fx) can be its own argument, a proposition "F(F(fx))" will be given, where the outer function F has a meaning different from the inner function F. In consequence, "F(F(fx))" will not be able to have a definite sense. Why, however, does Wittgenstein call into question a function F(fx) and "F(F(fx))"? To answer this question, we must examine closely Russell's own resolution of Russell's Paradox. Only when we can understand Russell's resolution can we do Wittgenstein's resolution. In particular, I will endeavor to show that the idea in Wittgenstein's 1913 letter to Russell provides a decisive clue for this problem.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• 제17권12호
• /
• pp.169-179
• /
• 2017

To examine the causal association between story usage and the ability of comprehending social relations, this study analyzed whether the short-term use of story heightened the degree of other-focused attention. To this end, this study randomly assigned 74 participants into three groups(novel, film, and exposition conditions), and participants were exposed to the stimuli for about 30 minutes, and then this study compared the degree of other-focused attention of the three groups. The results suggested that the degree of other-focused attention in the story groups (novel and film) were significantly higher than those in the exposition group. Though causal association between story usage and the ability of comprehending social relations were not clear, via demonstrating the formation of other-focused attention due to short-term use of story, this study provided empirical evidence for the simulation account of story.

• 한국체육학회지인문사회과학편
• /
• 제54권3호
• /
• pp.231-242
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to verify relationship between self-management and self-reflection for grasping athletes' emotional intelligence in deviation environment. The subjects of this study were selected 200 athletes who have a Nationwide Sport Meeting among athletes of being registered in the association as an athlete. The Descriptive Statistical Analysis Correlation Analysis and Regression Analysis As a result, Frist, training-management which is has direct effect on self-probe, personal relation/body-management which is on other-understand, behavior-management which is indirect effect on other-probe, body-managment which is on others-probe, mental power-management which is direct effect onself-understand. Second, mental power/body-management which is direct effect on self-sensitivity recognize, mental power/living-management which is direct effect on sensitivity application, mental power-management which is direct effect on others-sensitivity recognize, mental power/personal relation-management which is direct effect on sensitivity control.

• 발명특허
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.30-33
• /
• 2012

필자가 출원 상담을 하다 보면 의뢰인이 사용하려고 하는 상표가 등록된 상표와 유사한 경우가 있어 "사용하시려는 상표가 선등록/선출원된 상표와 유사하여 등록이 어려워 보입니다" 라는 말을 건네면 많은 의뢰인들이 자신들의 상표와 선점상표가 왜 유사하다고 판단하는 지에 대해 잘 이해하지 못하시는 분들이 많다. 의뢰인들의 얘기를 듣다 보면 상표법적인 유사 판단 기준을 모르는 입장에서는 일견 당연히 그렇게 생각할 수도 있겠다는 생각이 들기도 한다. 그렇지만, 상표의 유사 여부는 상표법적으로 정해 놓은 기준이 있고, 그 정해진 기준에 따라 판단하기 때문에 어느 정도 그 기준을 이해한다면 이미 타인이 선점해 놓은 상표와 유사한 상표를 네이밍한다거나 출원하는 실수를 줄이는 데 도움이 될 수 있겠다는 생각으로 특허청의 심사례와 법원의 판례를 통해 본 유사상표 판단의 기준을 쉽게 정리해 보았다. 다만, 상표의 유사 여부는 일반적인 기준 외에도 사안에 따라 개별적이고도 구체적인 요소를 고려해야만 하는 경우들도 적지 않으므로 이하의 글에 적힌 기준들이 모든 경우에 일률적으로 적용되는 것만은 아니라는 점을 미리 밝혀두고 싶다. 이하의 글은 상표를 네이밍하거나 출원하기에 앞서 선점상표와의 유사 여부를 미리 판단하고자 할 때 주로 참고할 주요 기준들을 열거한 것이므로, 실제 상표권으로 인한 분쟁이 발생했거나 발생할 염려가 있는 경우에는 반드시 전문가와 상담해 보시기 바란다.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.309-346
• /
• 2013

This paper deals with the problem, which logic of language and which metaphysics Wittgenstein suggests in the Tractatus logico-philosophicus. I will ultimately show how he bases the metaphysics on the logic of language. The logic of language by which Wittgenstein sets the limit to the language 'in the language' is the logical syntax of the language. And Wittgenstein extends the idea of the logical syntax to the understanding the nature of the world, i.e. to the metaphysics. The logical form the language(proposition) must have is the form of the world(or the nature of the world), and it can be determined only together with the logical syntax of the language. But what is the logical form(form of the world) 'cannot be said', since the proposition saying it is devoid of 'sense' and 'says nothing'. Therefore Wittgenstein expresses that the logical form(form of the world) 'can only be shown' in the proposition that has sense. The Metaphysics Wittgenstein wants to base on the logic of language(the logical syntax) must be mystical.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.417-446
• /
• 2019

The operation theory of the Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus is the essential basis of the philosophy of mathematics of the Tractatus. Wittgenstein presents the definition of cardinal numbers on the basis of operation theory, and suggests the proof of "$2{\times}2=4$" by using the theory of operations in 6.241. Therefore, in order to explicate correctly the philosophy of mathematics, it is required to understand rigorously the theory of operations in the Tractatus. Accordingly in this paper, I will endeavor to explicate operation theory of the Tractatus as a preliminary study for explicating the philosophy of mathematics of the Tractatus. In this process, we can ascertain Frascolla's important contributions and fallacies in his reconstruction of 6.241. In particular, we can understand the background that in 6.241 Wittgenstein made mistakes and that there he dealt with the addition operation of the theory of operations, and on the basis of this, we can reconstruct correctly 6.241.