• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.113-127
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 탈근대의 건축 공간을 고정되지 않고 지속적인 변화의 개념으로 보고, 변화하는 관계 네트워크로 건축 내 공간 요소를 이해하는 것을 목표로 한다. 연구의 목적은 관계성이라는 관점에서 렘 콜하스와 SANAA의 작품에 나타난 공간적 특성을 밝힘과 동시에 두 건축가의 공간구성 전략을 분석하는 것이다. 연구의 방법은 관계성의 대한 이론적 고찰을 통해 비고정적 관계성의 의미를 정의한 후 렘 콜하스와 SANAA의 건축적 접근방법에 대해 살펴보았다. 관계성을 공간의 프로그램, 환경, 사용자 그리고 가구와 집기로 구분하여 두 건축가의 작품 분석하였다. 결과적으로 두 건축가 모두 조직화에 의해 경직된 프로그램을 거부하고 가능성이 내재된 관계성을 건축공간 활성화 목적으로 활용하고 있다는 점에서는 유사하지만, 렘 콜하스는 사용자의 행위유발 기제의 전략을 사용하고 있는 반면, SANAA는 사용자의 자율적 행위를 담는 이완공간의 전략을 사용하고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.80-90
• /
• 2004

Scientism is a kind of paradigm since the birth of Modernism. Architectural design was also effected from scientism in the 1st Machine age, and being effected still In the End Machine age. But many architects in the 2nd Machine age express scientism in architectural design as a "science for kick" as SF. The design of Rem Koolhaas follows the line of Modernism which was effected from scientism in many ways. However he shows modified machine aesthetics as SF pataphysics mixed with literary imagination, and now shows new science paradigm in post-modern age. He expresses many new science theory like indeterminacy theory, chaos, catastrophe theory in his works. And those are expressed as indeterminate program that proceeds in non-linear way, rhizome in space, order out of chaos, topological metamorphosis as a catastrophe. This study analyzes the expression of scientism in architectural design of Rem Koolhaas since 1970s.nce 1970s.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.35-42
• /
• 2004

This study dealt with approaches in architecture and music in the contemporary situation characterized by accidence and uncertainty through Pierre Boulez and Rem Koolhaas' works. First of all, we examined basic positions with starting from zero degree breaking from fixed ideas and with relative neutrality. Then, from a methodological aspect, we inquired into 1) anti-hierarchical objective approach, 2) accidental approach to form. 3) diagram of structure and event, and 4) the use of selective routes. Lastly, from a receptive aspect, we dealt with the space of pluralistic perspective and works in progress. The two persons used chaosmos approach that enables adjustment and control through structure defining the relationship with accidence or chaos. With the approach, they created works in progress or open works that have a pluralistic viewpoint working in the field of specific relation and the concept of endless regeneration.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제34권7호
• /
• pp.69-78
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this article is: firstly, to survey architect Rem Koolhaas' preservation theory by reviewing his essays, books, exhibitions, and research projects focusing on preservation-related issues; and secondly, to formally analyse OMA's remodeling projects from 1970's to the present. From this analysis, this article tries to classify OMA's remodeling projects into four distinct categories and to establish, respectively, four generally-applicable remodeling strategies: 1)'Interior-oriented', 2)'Juxtaposition', 3)'Infill' and 4)'Cohesion.' Finally, this article argues that these remodeling strategies can be interpreted as a consistent pursuit of integration of various programmatic elements.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권10호
• /
• pp.138-147
• /
• 2012

현대에 이르러 공간디자인 분야에 나타난 의미 있는 시도는 공간구축과 담론의 교차점을 찾으려 시도한 것으로 평가된다. 본 연구는 현대 철학자인 질 들뢰즈가 프란시스 베이컨의 회화를 분석하여 자신의 담론을 전개한 문헌에서 공간적 단서를 찾아 현대 공간디자인과의 공통적 특성을 밝히는 것이다. 들뢰즈의 분석에 따르면 베이컨의 회화는 골격-배경(아플라), 형상-형태(형상) 그리고 윤곽-한계(트랙)라는 세 가지요소로 구분된다. 이러한 회화의 세 요소로부터 '형상-사건의 발생', '트랙-감각의 장소', '아플라-배경과의 상호작용'이라는 공간적 분석어를 추출했다. 그리고 이 분석어로 렘 콜하스의 최근 작품을 분석했다. 렘콜하스의 작품에서 확인되는 들뢰즈 공간론은 사용자와 공간 사이에 발생하는 사건 중심, 사건 발생을 유도하는 장소, 사용자와 공간 또는 공간과 대지 사이의 차이생성이란 방식의 적용이다. 결과적으로 현대 담론과 공간디자인 모두는 생명 운동에 의한 '차이'로서 이해된다는 공통의 특성을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.115-134
• /
• 2011

International Competition for Parc de la Villette has evoked the old architectural question that is about the conflict between unchanging architecture and ever changing time. Tschumi and Koolhaas suggested well-known solutions for it, both of which had started from the criticism of general urban design approach that ignored changing factors in time. However, this study argues that the approaches of Tschumi and Koolhaas are even opposite to each other in spite of their common aims. Influenced by deconstructivists' theories, Tschumi tries to generate the 'text' on the surface of la Villette so that the different users of the park can read it differently. The text is built by 'superimposing' different systems such as points, lines, and surfaces. This study criticizes such formalistic approach since such 'forms' do not generate any dialogue with the real users but just stay as a backdrop for irrelevant events. Meanwhile, Koolhaas concentrates on the 'ground-ness' of la Villette. What he deals with is the real ground which embraces all the potentials on it already. His 'bands' express nothing but the metamorphosis of the ground, and the ground generates the 'differences' out of itself by repeating itself ceaselessly. This study tries to clarify all those happenings and meanings by intimate investigation of various drawing works for the la Villette project by Tschumi and Koolhaas.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.47-55
• /
• 2016

This article explores an extended sense of autonomy in contemporary architecture activated through the practice of fashion, by taking architect Rem Koolhaas' work Prada Epicenter in New York as a case. In doing so, it argues that throughout the work Koolhaas sets up a world in which the corporate and the individual are entangled together in complex ways. Instead of considering Prada Epicenter to be the exemplar illustrating that the global company-Prada-institutionalizes the designed commercial space in a top-down manner, this article claims that such a space imbricates a multiplicity of meaning that is generated at the intersections of the local and the global, the ordinary and the spectacular, and the individual and the institutional. In this respect French philosopher Gilles Lipovetsky's fashion theory works as a critical point: his claim that the ambivalence of fashion-both as corporate power and individual freedom-is a threshold encouraging us to better understand the operativity of late capitalism in daily life is extended to Koolhaas' case. In other words, Koolhaas' Prada Epicenter brings forth possibilities that the ostensibly technocratic and institutionalized space in fact works as a resillient field where senses of individual autonomy arise in the aid of corporative practice of branding.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.47-56
• /
• 2009

This research aims to analyze the characteristics of the architectural space of Rem Koolhaas based on the spatial discourse of Gilles Deleuze, a philosopher of post-structuralism which comprehends pluralism accepting even contingency and uncertainty beyond deterministic attitudes of structuralism that has led the western discourses since the 19th century. First of all, this research will reflect on Deleuze's spatial concept through literatures and extract the characteristics related to architectural spaces. Then, on the basis of these characteristics, it will analyze the characteristics which were applied to the interior space of the recent architectural works of Rem Koolhaas to find out how Deleuze's spatial dicourse was embodied. Among Deleuze's speculations, the characteristics which falls under the spatial discourse were classified into three categories; degree between the striated space and the smooth one, the space of events and singularity, and the space of the multiple sense. These analysis words are used to look into the correlations among the specific practicing methods embodied in the architecture of Kookhaas. In conclusion, in the architectural space of Rem Koolhaas, it was found that the characteristics of Gilles Deleuze's spatial discourse of post-structuralism were embodied by the methods such as (1) Space of continuous transition, (2) Space of the $multiplicit{\acute{e}}$ accepting contingent events, (3) Space of the multiple sense, and (4) Space of movement.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제34권7호
• /
• pp.89-98
• /
• 2018

Koolhaas' perspective on urbanism differs from the modern urbanism and typological urbanism. The Melun-Senart masterplan, La $D{\acute{e}}fense$ masterplan shows unique characteristic different from that of conventional urbanism. The roots of this creative approach can be found in the traits of his research with O.M. Ungers back in the 1970s. Koolhaas and Ungers have collaborated intimately from 1972 to 1977 to work on urban projects. This collaboration reaches its cilmax in their project City in the City, where many of Koolhaas' core concepts such as archipelago, void/solid, plurality, infrastructure, congestion, and social condenser are introduced. This thesis will explore the development of these concepts in their collaboration and shed new light on how this period has made a transition into Koolhaas' perspective on urbanism and architecture as well as his works. The purpose of this study is to investigate these core concepts of Koolhaas in City in the City, and to find the development and the meaning of these concepts in his projects.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.93-102
• /
• 2019

In 1960s Russian avant-garde architects such as Moisei Ginzburg, Konstantin Melnikov and Ivan Leonidov were rediscovered in the western architectural society. In this period Rem Koolhaas investigated the projects of Ivan Leonidov with great enthusiasm. In late 1920s and early 1930s when the hope and fantasy to the social revolution and technology reached the climax, The third generation of Russian avant-garde intended to find the new synthesis of the technology, the form and the social ideology. In this context, Leonidov proposed audacious projects from the small scale to the urban scale in the influence of Malevich's suprematism, Vesnin's technological fantasy and Ginzburg's concept of "social condenser". These projects seriously affected Koolhaas. This relationship of Leonidov and Koolhaas was indicated but not investigated in concrete manner. This study intends to analyze the projects of Leonidov and to investigate the relationship of Leonidov and Koolhaas in Delirious NewYork and in the projects of Koolhaas. We will analyse this relationship in three categories : hedonistic technology, social collectivity and pure geometry.