• 한국도로학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2000.11a
• /
• pp.205-209
• /
• 2000

• Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
• /
• 2008.04a
• /
• pp.993-996
• /
• 2008

It has been reported that destruction test by core collection is the most reliable of the structural concrete strength in present building construction field. But it causes low efficiency by damage and cutting in structure due to the core collection. It also has some problems in repairing. Additionally in case of strength test with management specimen, different environment compared to the structure environment cause problems about estimation precise structure strength. Therefore, it is required to develop structure direct strength test that has test values and credibility above the ones obtained by core specimen collection strength test and seasonal specimen test to suggest a reasonable and practical management method of structural concrete.

• 레미콘
• /
• s.75
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2003

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.17 no.9
• /
• pp.552-558
• /
• 2016

Recently, the repair and reinforcement of deteriorated concrete buildings has attracted much interest. In order to accurately evaluate the safety of these existing structures, it is essential to know the strength of the concrete that they are composed of. The core drilling method is considered to be the most effective and common method of assessing the compressive strength of concrete. In general, the regulations do not permit the core specimens within reinforcing bars to be used to assess the strength of the concrete, even if the core specimens contain reinforcing bars in some cases. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the reinforcement arrangement on the compressive strength of concrete, and to propose the quantitative specific standard of strength for core specimens containing reinforcements, in order to facilitate their safe inspection by repair or retrofit companies who want to evaluate the soundness of the structures. To complete this research, one type of cylinder specimen without reinforcement and 14 types of specimens with reinforcement arrangements were prepared and their compressive strength evaluated. It was found that the strength of the cylinders with reinforcement volumes of up to $50cm^3$ (about 4-ϕ13mm) was more than 80% of that of the cylinders without any reinforcement.

• Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.13 no.4
• /
• pp.76-83
• /
• 2001

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.92-97
• /
• 2018

Recently, the safety issue of high-rise concrete buildings damaged by fire, helicopter collisions, earthquakes, and faulty construction has attracted a great deal of interest. It is essential to know the strength of the concrete in order to accurately evaluate its safety for the reinforcement of these buildings. The core drilling method is considered to be the most effective method of assessing the compressive strength of concrete. However, it is very difficult to retrieve the core without the reinforcing bars, because buildings made with high-strength concrete are overcrowded with reinforcing bars. These reinforcing bars are often present in the core specimens, but there are few research studies and no regulations concerning the assessment of the strength of the concrete for high-strength core specimens within reinforcing bars. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the reinforcement arrangement on the strength of the concrete and to present the quantitative values. To complete this research, the compressive strengths of different types of concrete with two different strengths (40 MPa and 60 MPa), two reinforcing bar diameters (10 mm and 12 mm), and 15 types of specimens with or without reinforcement arrangements were prepared and tested. As a result, the strength of the cylinders whose volume is less than or equal to the reinforcement volume of $53.1cm^3$ (about 4 - 13 mm) was predicted to have a low value of up to 60% of the strength of the cylinders without reinforcement.

• Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.366-375
• /
• 2017

Internal factors having effects on compressive strength test results of concrete include size, shape, height-diameter ratio(h/d), section processing method, dryness and wetness, etc. of the specimen. As it is difficult to ensure dimensions of core specimen due to rebar cutting from rebar spacing, wall thickness, effects on the structure, etc. when taking core of the concrete structure, correction of dimensions and h/d of the specimen become important for quality control of the concrete. Thus, in order to review effects of specimen size and height-diameter ratio for the concretes with compressive strength within 40~60MPa, this study has experimentally reviewed compressive strength test values by applying correction factors pursuant to KS F 2422 (Method of obtaining and testing drilled cores and sawed beams of concrete), when changing specimen diameter to ${\emptyset}5{\sim}15cm$, and h/d to 2.0~1.25.

• Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
• /
• 2011.04a
• /
• pp.521-524
• /
• 2011

본 논문에서는 순환골재에 대하여 구조용 적용성 검증을 목표로 하였으며, 천연골재와 순환골재 치환율에 따른 압축파괴강도와 압축강도증가에 따른 파속도의 상관관계를 비교 분석하였다. 설계기준강도 21, 27, 35MPa에 순환굵은골재 치환율 0, 30, 50, 100%를 적용하여 설계기준강도에 따른 순환굵은골재 치환율의 배합을 총 12가지로 설정하였다. 재령160일까지의 압축파괴강도의 변화를 대기양생 공시체, 수중 양생공시체 그리고 코어공시체를 이용하여 비교하였고, 모의부재(800${\times}$800${\times}$200mm)를 통하여 재령160일까지의 초음파속도를 측정하였다. 압축파괴실험을 통하여 취득한 데이터를 비교해 본 결과 순환굵은골재 치환율에 따른 강도저하현상은 나타나지 않았다. 또한, 재령일에 따른 강도 증가와 함께 파속도도 같이 증가함을 알 수 있었다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
• /
• 2008.11a
• /
• pp.965-968
• /
• 2008

The KS F 2403 method used on domestic sites for checking the compressive strength of a structure, sets the compressive strength of the concrete used in structural specimens as the compressive strength of testing specimens. Under this regulation, the curing method used for testing the specimens must be the standard ponding curing method (20$\pm$2$^{\circ}$C). However, because in-placed concrete is exposed to open air and cured under the seasonal temperature changes, the compressive strength of a real structure is different from the tested compressive strength. (Therefore,) This thesis first identifies the distinct characteristics of the strength development by applying the curing method listed under the KS and used for testing specimens on compressive strength tests; the atmospheric curing method, the sealed curing method, and the structural specimen core strength testing methods used for the in-sites quality checks including reckoning of the compressive strength of the structural specimens and form-demolding period; and the curing method suggested in this research, which sets the internal conditions of the structural specimens as the conditions of the applied curing method. Then, the thesis suggests the specimen curing method that most closely reenacts the compressive strength of the concrete used on the structural specimens

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2023.11a
• /
• pp.143-144
• /
• 2023

The compressive strength of concrete varies depending on various factors. Among them, based on the curing temperature, the KCS 14 20 10 Standard Specification for General Concrete calculates the nominal strength by applying the temperature correction value (Tn) based on the compressive strength of the standard cured concrete at 20±2℃ when designing the formulation strength. However, Tn is a correction value that considers only the temperature, and the correction of strength difference due to heat of hydration is not applied. Therefore, in this study, one-component and two-component concrete are mixed in the summer, structural concrete are manufactured, standard concrete specimen are manufactured, and coring is performed on the central and boundary parts of the structural concrete to calculate the correction value applied to the nominal strength by comparing the compressive strength of standard cured concrete on the 28th day of curing and the compressive strength of structural concrete on the 91st day of curing.