• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.6 no.6 s.87
• /
• pp.26-31
• /
• 1996

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.6 no.6 s.87
• /
• pp.39-49
• /
• 1996

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.6 no.6 s.87
• /
• pp.32-38
• /
• 1996

• 대학교육
• /
• s.129
• /
• pp.40-42
• /
• 2004

출연(연)과 대학은 우리나라의 미래 사회발전과 국가경쟁력을 좌우할 핵심 주체로서 협력과 연계를 통한 새로운 도약의 전기를 모색하는 것이 최우선의 과제가 되고 있다.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.26 no.9 s.292
• /
• pp.50-59
• /
• 1993

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.11 no.3 s.129
• /
• pp.29-40
• /
• 2001

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.33 no.3 s.370
• /
• pp.44-46
• /
• 2000

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.33 no.3 s.370
• /
• pp.58-61
• /
• 2000

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2003.10a
• /
• pp.43-46
• /
• 2003

Government's R ＆ D Subsidy system is difference to the agency of R ＆ D performance. Ministry of Science and Technology(MOST), Ministry of Information and Communication(MIC) have a similarity rules to grants programs by the President's order. Name is 'The Rules of the National R ＆ D Program Management'. But this rules established for the national institute, university and big enterprise., Then, This Rules difference for the Snail and Medium Enterprise(SME's). Some article is not allowed for the SME's. So, Suggestion for this question should improvement.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.179-207
• /
• 2016

This study suggested the necessity of the management of R & D management records produced from government-supported science research institutes (the so-called "gwagichulyeon") and of a record management manual (item). As such, it gathered rules with regard to record management, conducted a survey, and interviewed general R & D managers. As a result of the research, the ratio of the arrangement of R & D managers to R & D management departments is 100%; however, the ratio of the arrangement of record managers is 33.3%-50%, and the ratio of the arrangement of record management departments is 23.1%, which was poor. The enactment ratio of record management rules is 26.4%, and 73.7% of institutes has managed their records under the provision only of document management rules or only of office management rules. R & D management records has been collected according to an institute's capability without a prescribed collection scope, and the conditions with regard to the omission, damage, and loss of records were poor. There are institutes that did not comprehend the production status of R & D management records. Thus, as a response, this study suggested a record management manual (item) established for the arrangement duties of record managers and record management departments as well as for notifications on the status of R & D management records. In addition, this study produced a standardized collection scope and described how to manage R & D management records.