• Korean Architects
• /
• no.7 s.315
• /
• pp.102-103
• /
• 1995

서울시 서초구청에서는 '반포 종합사회복지관'건립 현상설계경기를 실시하여 대도건축(윤태수)안을 당선작으로 선정, 지난 5월 8일 발표했다. 이번 설계경기는 고속터미널이 소재하여 유동인구가 많고 ATP가 밀집되어 있는 반포지역의 지역적 특수성을 감안하여 주민복지 욕구에 부응하는 건강하고 문화적인 지역주민 생활을 보장하는 지역사회 복지 서비스를 제공하기 위해 실시됐다. 총 6개 사무소에서 작품을 제출한 이번 설계경기의 우수작으로는 하규ㆍ다남건축(안병일)안이 선정됐다.

• Korean Journal of Family Social Work
• /
• no.62
• /
• pp.103-139
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to explore the social workers' reflections developed during the participatory action research seeking practice methods in the community welfare center single parent self-help groups. Nine social workers and researchers sharing difficulties in the community welfare center single parent self-help group practice were involved in the participatory action research. We performed a circulatory research repeating 'plan-action-reflection-replan' cycles through ten sessions of research meetings including peer supervision in parallel with 4 self-help group practices. Multiple practice methods were derived as the result among which change in the social workers' perception was the key. We focused on the result that the social workers' perception was changed by reflections from participatory action research and the contents of the reflections were qualitatively analyzed using materials acquired during the study. As a result the following 5 themes were derived; 'recognition and worry on the lack of appropriate practice for the self-help group', 'specification of the social workers' role based on the changed perspective on the member-social worker relation', 'confirmation of the possibility of the concerned person initiated practice', 'detailed understanding of the single parent self-help group in the community welfare center', and 'renewed recognition of the development of the single parent self-help group in the community welfare center'. Based on these results, empowerment and reflection/reflective practice for single parent self-help group in the community welfare center were discussed.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.10 no.11
• /
• pp.251-261
• /
• 2010

The research examine countermeasures of community welfare center, total welfare service provider in the local, to establish of identity and revitalization in the rapidly changing social circumstances. It examine countermeasures of the community welfare center in institutional and practical environment of welfare environment. The community welfare center has to provide welfare service which is improvement the quality of life in local, to be as methodical casework facility and to solve the community matters throughout organized residents. Also, comparison with specific welfare center and similar welfare facilities, the community welfare center has to provide differentiation services from totally welfare services. Finally, in privatized and market economic welfare environment, the community welfare center has to have policy countermeasures strategies to survive in competition not only welfare service provider.

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2000.04a
• /
• pp.561-579
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study is to grope for the improving the management in order that Korea community centers may put better welfare services to community residents. Community welfare center is a professional social welfare agency that meets welfare needs of community residents by offering synthetical and various welfare services in community according to social, economical, cultural, regional background. Community welfare center was established for clearing up the conflict between social classes after Industrial Revolution in England, for solving problems of women movement and immigration in America, for different purpose in other countries. But there is no difference between countries in the sense of welfare services activities centering around poor community though each purpose are different. It can be known that community center must perform the function as social welfare professional agency which aimed at community care program. Resource which are needed for management of community center are mostly in community and community center must strive to get resources which are in community. But all the weakness of finance and facility which community center has may not be solved by using community resources. Community welfare center is not fixated yet in Korea. And community residents has little understanding of community center. Thus national financial support is needed. Actually community has difficulty to mobilize community resource. The problem is how to carry out this national financial support effectively and going on study about this problem is needed.

• Korean Journal of Childcare and Education
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.75-95
• /
• 2013

This study searched for the common and different aspects of social community welfare centers and health family support centers for family welfare practice of the community. We also tried to find out the awareness of workers and the performance function for each institution. Through the interviews and review of literature, and comparative analysis of operating status, we looked for the common and different aspects, and the direction of development, which evolved family welfare into the community by way of function and relationships of both institutions. As a result, the participants of this study pursued common purposes. They however made aware of the issues of discrimination about social values and each institution's functions. We suggest that the social community welfare center focuses on individuals and families, in order to integrate the community. A health family support center should play the role to fulfill needs for family welfare according to family life cycle, and have good accessibility for individuals and families in the community.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.18 no.11
• /
• pp.425-432
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to analyze mission statements of social welfare centers. For this, we collected mission statements of 385 social welfare centers nationwide. We analyzed data using the NVivo 10 program. Analysis results found the total number of collected words was 1,401. The number of words corresponding to the target of organizations was 448 (32.0%), the number of words corresponding to problems was 51 (3.6%), the number of words corresponding to the directionality 118 (8.4%), the number of words corresponding to strategy was 545 (38.9%), and the number of words corresponding to organization's image was 239 (17.1%). Second, the words of the intervention target were resident of community, local community and community. Intervention issues included community problems, poverty, and social isolation. The words of the organizational directivity included welfare community/village, social welfare, and empowerment. Words related to organizational strategy were formation/building, sharing/serving, and improvement/development/improvement. Words related to the organizational image included in the mission statements were the welfare center, we, the professional agency, and the neighbors. By analyzing the mission statements, we found that social welfare centers portrayed its identity based on 'locality'. The distribution of the words related to the community was high in both the target, target, and direction. The limitations of this study include the exclusion of analyzing the relationship between organizational mission and organizational performance. This should be considered in future studies.

• Social Workers
• /
• no.8 s.40
• /
• pp.4-11
• /
• 2005

현대사회에서 내 집 마련은 가정의 안정적 유지를 위한 기본적 요소이다. 그러나 지난 5월 통계청에서 발표한 '1/4분기 가계수지 동향'을 기준으로 가계소득 329만 1,000원인 도시근로자가 대출이나 부모의 도움 없이 저축만으로 내 집을 마련하는데 걸리는 기간은 서울 25평 아파트 20년 9개월, 32평형은 27년 5개월 걸리는 것으로 집계됐다. 그렇다면 '사회복지'라는 커다란 영역안에는 어떠한 형태의 집들이 존재할까? 우리나가 거의 대부분의 사회복지기관, 시설들은 지방자치단체에 의해 법인에게 위탁, 임대되어지는 것이 대부분이다. 물론 국가가 법인직영의 반위탁 형태로 운영되는 곳도 있지만 아주 극소수이다. 우리나라 지역복지의 핵심 주체인 지역사회복지관의 경우(한국사회복지관협회, 2005) 사회복지법인 289개소, 재단법인 47갯, 사단법인 9개소, 학교법인 22개소, 지방자치단체 직영이 14개로, 거의 대부분의 복지관이 민간위탁으로 운영되고 있다. 대부분이 전세집살이를 하고 있는 것이다. 이번호에서는 이러한 민간위탁의 미흡한 제도와 과정에 대한 현장의 소리를 들업고자 한다.

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2001.10a
• /
• pp.246-273
• /
• 2001

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.9
• /
• pp.516-527
• /
• 2021

Due to the aging population and the entry of baby boomers into the elderly, the elderly are recognized as a group with diversity rather than a single group with the same needs. Therefore, it is necessary to try to grasp the factors that the elderly use welfare centers from the perspective of consumers. The results showed that gender, age, education, occupation, economic status, social class, number of friends, number of social activities, number of diseases, and depression were significant. In other words, women than men, older people, highly educated people, elderly people without jobs, elderly people with poor economic status, the elderly belonging to a lower social class, the more friends, the more social activities involved, the more diseases, the higher the depression, the higher the probability of using the welfare center. It was found that heterogeneous elderly groups, such as the elderly with high educational background, many friends, and active participation in society, and the elderly, economically difficult, and poor in health, use the welfare center. Based on these research results, policy and practical suggestions were made to improve the quality of welfare services for the elderly.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.44 no.2
• /
• pp.231-264
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to find out how local residents using social welfare services in permanent rental apartment areas experience stigma, and how they perceive it. Data collection was carried out for 10 months from May 2012 to February 2013. Interviews were conducted with 13 users who are using or have the experience of using services in social welfare centers, and 12 hands-on workers of the institutions; the results were then analyzed using the modified grounded theory. The results of analysis are as follows. First, a considerable number of people living in permanent rental apartment areas experience stigma while experiencing impoverishment; and they also feel stigma in the formularization process to become recipients. Second, users experience stigma in the process of using social welfare center services located in permanent rental apartment areas after becoming recipients as well. Third, in cases where permanent rental apartment areas are located in the immediate neighborhood of general residence areas, residents living inside and outside the areas were found to give stigma to the residents of permanent rental apartment areas. This study has significance in that it provides an in-depth clarification of the reality of stigma experienced by users of social welfare center services in permanent rental apartment areas through qualitative research