• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.717-721
• /
• 2009

This research knowledge and practice about a patient's oral health and oral hygiene related quality of life you want to measure the impact of oral health impact assessment, one of OHIP was evaluated by using the. The results are used daily in prevention knowledge and everyday knowledge, and how to use knowledge of dental supplies highly subjective feel the higher quality of lift. And with medical knowledge and experience, acquired knowledge OHIP higher the lower the quality of lift according to the subjective feel. Meanwhile, one of the whitening treatment aesthetic appreciation treatment higher subjective knowledge feel the higher quality of life. This means that knowledge of preventive oral health and aesthetic impart is expected to affect the index.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2004.04b
• /
• pp.490-492
• /
• 2004

영화, 애니메이션, 게임 등 디지털 문화 컨텐츠에서 의상을 입은 캐릭터들의 사실성이 강조되는데, 기존의 패션 CAD나 의상 애니메이션 소프트웨어들은 디자인에 있어서 여러 단계의 작업을 거쳐야 하고 의상 디자인의 전문성을 요구한다 특히, 최근 우리 문화 원형의 디지털 컨텐츠화로 디지털 한복의 수요가 증가하고 있으며, 한복은 재단이나 착용방식 등에서 양복과는 구성학적 차이점을 지님에도 불구하고 디지털 한복 제작을 위한 전문 시뮬레이션 도구는 전무하다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 전통적인 한복의 제작에서 사용하는 신체 치수 측정방법과 옷본 및 체형에 따른 사이즈 조정 방법을 지식베이스로 구축하였다. 이를 통해 한복에 대한 사전 지식이 업는 사용자들도 가상 캐릭터에 쉽게 한복을 착용 시킬 수 있는 지식 기반 한복 드레이핑 방법을 제안한다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.410-418
• /
• 2021

In a program that runs an engineering education certification, program outcomes refer to the knowledge, skills, and attitudes a student must have until graduation. In general, capstone design is used as a tool for evaluating program outcomes. This paper applies the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to measure the raters' reliability in assessing program outcomes. Several raters evaluate program outcomes, and the result is used to obtain the raters' ICC. ICC measures the reliability of ratings or measurements for clusters - data that has been collected as groups or sorted into groups. If the ICC is close to 1, it means that the reliability among the raters is high. We evaluated the proposed method's usefulness through case analysis. As a method for assessing an evaluation tool's objectivity, multiple raters measure the same evaluation tool. As a result, we measured the ICC values for all POs, and analyzed the cause for the low measured POs. We applied this method to evaluate program outcomes of the Department of Computer Engineering in the past two years. As a result, we derived guidelines for improvement and program outcomes.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.12 no.6
• /
• pp.249-258
• /
• 2021

The aim of this study was to determine the level of knowledge related to disease in patients with atrial fibrillation. We used the Jessa Atrial fibrillation Knowledge Questionnaire (JAKQ) and Knowledge of Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Prevention Questionnaire(KAFSP). A total of 222 AF patients completed the JAKQ and KAFSP. The mean score of the JAKQ and KAFSP 54.7 and 18.5 points, respectively. In general, patients with Atrial fibrillation were well aware that atrial fibrillation causes stroke and that anticoagulants should be taken to prevent blood clots. However, they were not well aware of the precautions for taking anticoagulants, symptoms of atrial fibrillation, and treatment of atrial fibrillation. There was no statistically significant difference in atrial fibrillation knowledge score according to anticoagulants but the degree of knowledge related to VKA was low in patients taking VKA. The both score of JAKQ and KAFSP had significant differences in atrial fibrillation knowledge depending on the level of education. Based on these finding, it is necessary to develop a customized education program in order to improve the knowledge of patients with atrial fibrillation.

• Korean Medical Education Review
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2002

본 연구의 목적은 의학교육입문검사의 개념의 틀을 형성하는데 있다. 본 연구의 목적을 구체적으로 살펴보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 본 연구는 의학교육입문검사라는 의학 적성측정도구를 개념화 하기위하여 지금까지의 일반적인 적성 검사와는 달리 의학적 인지능력 정의적 심리 구인과 의학관련 배경지식과 사고라는 의학적 적성 스펙트럼을 만들고자 한다. 한국 상황에서 적용가능하고 21세기에 요구하는 의학교육입문검사를 개념화하여 이론적 틀을 만들고자 했다. 둘째, 이 연구는 의학교육입문검사의 개념의 틀 위에서 각 개념을 양화를 통한 측정도구의 가능성을 열었다. 셋째, 본 연구는 본 검사를 통하여 의학대학과 의학전문대학원 지원 하고자하는 사람들에게 다양한 개인의 정보를 부여할 뿐만 아니라, 대학과 대학원에서의 학생 선발의 타당성을 높일 수 있는 실제적 자료를 제공해 입시사정에 유용한 자료를 얻을 수 있다는 의미에서 실제적 가치를 갖고 있다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.127-136
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to develop, field test an instrument to assess secondary school students' conceptions of the nature of science. The instrument named Philosophical Perspectives Probe(PPP) is a pool of 24 multiple-choice items that address a wide range of philosophical topics of science. The statements and the choices of this instrument were derived from an analysis of various philosophical positions. The main philosophical systems of the instrument are inductivism, falsificationism, and relativism, respectively. Major distinctions depend on the issues of the criteria of demarcation, patterns of scienctific change, epistemological status of scientific knowledge, and the scientific methods. The researchers also offer teachers a new way of assessing and interpreting their students' conceptions on a wide variety of topics related to the nature of science.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.109-121
• /
• 2010

E-learning has become an ever-increasing delivery method in school and workplace. Many Web sites provide Internet users with lots of information and resources on study, research, and career development in workplace. First, this study aimed at presenting a process of validating instruments to measure perception of using the Web for learning. Secondly, this paper attempted to find out a list of critical constructs that university students recognize when they access Web sites to get some resources on their fields of study. This study also suggested the features of those constructs. This paper would help improve our understanding of Web usage for schoolwork and research. This result of the paper will facilitate further understanding of constructs associated with Web usage in other areas, thereby enabling researchers, practitioners, and policy makers to draw much attention to e-learning.

• Knowledge Management Research
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.23-38
• /
• 2008

This study develops a framework and instruments to diagnose the current knowledge management(KM) status of an organization and to suggest future KM implementation directions. Based on the comprehensive review of KM literature and KM case studies, we derive three main aspects(strategic, social and technical aspect) and seven critical factors(KM strategy, knowledge worker, organizational strucuture, organizational culture, KM processe, organizational knowledge, and information technology) for the successful KM implementation. The instruments developed in this study include every specific measurement items of each critical success factor, which are expected to help not only suggest a context-sensitive KM strategy but also evaluate current KM status of a designated organization. By introducing two dimensions of KM evaluation(effectiveness and necessity), a more holistic and contingent view of KM can be assured. Academic contributions as well as practical implications are discussed. Study limitations and future research directions are also provided.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.138-147
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study was to develop a measuring tool for the health promotion behavior of Korean nurses. This would address the lack of a proven tool that reflects the nature of the nurses' nursing environment. This study was conducted on 530 nurses from January to December 2019. A literature review and focus group interview were conducted, data analysis was carried out to measure validity and reliability, and the conceptual framework was constructed by applying the IMB model. Five factors namely self-concept (2 questions), hospital life management (4 questions), knowledge and information regarding health (5 questions), physical and mental stress management (3 questions), and work adaptation (2 questions) were framed into 16 questions. The model fit was 346.23 (��<.001), Parsimonious Normed Fit Index (PNFI) was 0.60, and Parsimonious Comparative Fit Index (PCFI) was 0.63, which met the acceptance criteria, and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was 0.10. Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.88, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) was 0.85, and Incremental Fit Index (IFI) was 0.85 which were found to be acceptable as per the applicable standards. All items had a Cronbach's �� score of .85, which ensured stable reliability. The nurse's health promotion behavior measurement tool developed in this study will be used to measure the nurse's health promotion behavior in terms of nursing practice which will help in understanding the broad contours of this behavior.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.1245-1255
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable evaluating instrument for elementary school fifth and sixth graders. The instrument is developed through R&D procedure, which includes two checks of science specialist and two field trials of the instrument. Evaluating items are content-free for each science inquiry skill. Each science inquiry element is based on SAPA and the 7th curriculum. This study has selected 10 science inquiry skills(observing, classifying, measuring, predicting, inferring, recognizing of a problem, controlling variables, interpreting data, drawing a conclusion, designing an experiment), formulated a clear definition of the elements of science inquiry skills, and established the objectives of evaluation. The content areas are divided into three categories, material and energy, life and environment, and the earth and circulation. Each category contains 10 items. So the instrument consists of 30 items. The content validity of items, objectivity of the scoring keys, and clarity of the items has been checked twice by specialists in science education. At the same time, two field trials were performed to produce the reliability of the instruments, discrimination index, and item difficulty index. The instrument has the content validity is 91.6%, reliability 0.79, objectivity 93.3%, discrimination index 0.30, and item difficulty index 66.1%.