• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.32 no.2
• /
• pp.320-330
• /
• 2012

Understanding the relation between basic science and applied science is important for students in understanding the importance of learning science, the relationship between scientific knowledge and human life, and for enhancing their science motivation. In this study, we evaluated the statistical validity of this hypothetical model and explored the effect of gender and students' preferred courses (e.g., humanities, science, and art) on four dependent variables. We also evaluated the differences of students' understanding across scientific domains and students' understanding concerning basic and applied scientific knowledge. Three hundred and twenty five 10th grade students participated in this survey research. Statistically, we employed bivariate correlation, partial correlation, path analysis, two-way ANOVA, and repeated measures ANOVA. Our findings illustrated that our hypothetical model was statistically valid. In addition, the significant interaction effects of gender and students' preferred courses on each dependent variable were shown. Students have different levels of understanding of the convergence of basic and applied science, the relation between scientific knowledge and human life, and the importance of learning science across scientific domains (e.g., physics, chemistry, earth science and biology).

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.25 no.5
• /
• pp.563-570
• /
• 2005

This study investigated the relationships among middle school students' understanding about the nature of scientific knowledge, conceptual understanding, and learning strategies. Grade 7 students (N=162) in Incheon completed the nature of scientific knowledge scales (NSKS) and a learning strategy questionnaire. After learning density by way of a CAl program, a conception test was administered. Results indicated that students' conceptual understanding and both deep and surface learning strategies were significantly correlated to their understanding about the nature of scientific knowledge. A cluster analysis was used to classify students on the basis of their deep and surface learning strategies. Three clusters of students with distinctive learning strategy patterns were found; high deep-low surface strategy (cluster 1), low deep-high surface strategy (cluster 2), and high deep-high surface strategy (cluster 3). One-way ANOVA results revealed that the scores of cluster 3 were significantly higher than those of the others in the NSKS and the conception test. Additionally, cluster 1 also performed better than cluster 2 in the conception test. Lastly, educational implications were discussed.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 1998.10c
• /
• pp.63-65
• /
• 1998

사회 전 분야에서 데이터가 폭발적으로 증가함에 따라 데이터를 이해하고 분석하는 새로운 자동적이고 지능적인 데이터 분석 도구와 기술이 필요하게 되었다. KDD(Knowledge Discovery in Databases)는 이러한 필요로부터 데이터에서 유용하고 이해 가능한 지식을 추출하는 연구이다. 데이터 마이닝(Data Mining)은 KDD에서 가장 중요한 단계로 데이터로부터 지식을 추출하는 단계이다. 데이터 마이닝에서 생성된 지식은 좋은 분류율을 가져야하고 이해하기 쉬워야한다. 본 논문에서는 퍼지 결정트리(FDT : Fuzzy Decision Tree)에 기반한 효율적인 데이터 마이닝 알고리즘을 제안한다. FDT의 각 링크는 속성(attribute) 값을 갖는 퍼지 집합이며, EDT의 각 경로는 퍼지 규칙을 생성한다. 제안된 알고리즘은 ID3의 이해성과 퍼지이론의 추론과 표현력을 결합한 방법으로 히스토그램에 이루어진다. 마지막으로 제안된 방법의 타당성을 검증하기 위해 표준적인 패턴 분류 벤치마크 데이터에 대한 실험 결과를 보인다.

• The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
• /
• v.7 no.5
• /
• pp.57-70
• /
• 2004

This study is the subsequent study that has the objectives examining the relationships among 'substantive understanding', 'scientific literacy' and 'learning intention' in computer supported intentional learning environments and inquiry ability, variables for affecting knowledge construction derived from the finding out of the former study. As a result, the current study confirmed in CSILE the close correlation between 'the learning intention for scientific inquiry' and 'substantive understanding', between 'the learning intention for scientific inquiry' and 'scientific literacy'. Another result showed that 'scientific literacy' was the most significant predictor on inquiry ability. Base on the result of this study, the present researcher is about to make suggestions to stimulate learners' scientific literacy in CSILE-based inquiry learning.

• Social Workers
• /
• no.7 s.39
• /
• pp.34-35
• /
• 2005

학교사회복지사는 학교 안에 있는 청소년종합사회복지관의 관장이면서 동시에 실무자라고 할 수 있다. 따라서 학교사회복지사가 되려면 학생에 대한 이해와 다양한 개입기술 뿐 아니라 학교체계와 교육제도에 대한 지식은 물론 기본적인 조직생활에 대한 이해, 사회복지제도와 여러 정책에 대한 지식, 협상기술, 복지 경영자로서의 능력과 행정기술 등이 먼저 구비되어야 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Database Society Conference
• /
• 1999.06a
• /
• pp.51-67
• /
• 1999

$\square$ 발표의 목적 금일 발표의 목적은 지식경영(이하 KM)의 필요성과 추진 전략에 대한LG-EDS 시스템의 실천적 경험을 소개드림으로써, KM에 대한 전반적 이해를 돕고 적용의 필요성 및 방법을 공감하는 데 있음 $\square$ 기업 활동의 본질과 경영의 의미 기업활동이 영속되려면 생산성을 극대화하고 품질 수준을 확보 유지하는 것이 반드시 뒷받침되어야만 하며, 이를 달성하려는 다각적인 전략 및 활동들을 경영의 본질로 정의할 수 있음(중략)

• Electronics and Telecommunications Trends
• /
• v.15 no.3 s.63
• /
• pp.73-90
• /
• 2000

현대 지식조직의 생산원리를 이해하기 위해서는 무형의 지적자산에 대한 인식이 필수적이며, 그 생성 및 성장의 메커니즘에 대한 올바른 이해를 바탕으로 지식조직에 적합한 조직운영의 재설계가 가능하다. 본 고는 최근까지 소개된 지적자산의 측정과 관리에 관한 여러 연구결과를 종합.정리해봄으로써 지식조직의 경영전략 모색을 위한 기초를 제공하고자 한다.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.15
• /
• pp.77-86
• /
• 2003

초등학교 영재들은 여러 사설 교육기관이나 국립기관 그리고 개인 교습을 통하여 많은 양의 선수학습을 행하고 있다. 이들 중 일부는 방법과 이유를 아는 관계 이해를 하기보다는, 주어진 규칙을 적용하여 정답을 찾아내는 도구적 이해를 하고 있다. 그들은 수학을 능동적이기보다는 수동적인 입장에서 받아들이기에 새로운 수학적 지식을 창출하지 못하는 성향을 강하게 보이고 있다. 이에 본 연구자는 이러한 문제의 해결을 위해 초등학교 영재들이 가지고 있는 수학적 스키마와 선생님들이 가르치는 스키마 사이의 간격에 초점을 맞추어 연구하였다. 대전에 있는 영재교육기관에 등록된 초등학교 3학년 영재들을 대상으로 하여 연구한 결과, 스키마와 스키마 사이의 간격이 멀수록 학생들이 방법과 이유를 아는 관계적 이해를 하기보다는 주어진 규칙을 적용하여 정답을 찾아내는 도구적 이해를 하고, 그 간격을 줄일수록 수학에 흥미를 느끼고 고학년의 수학내용까지도 스스로 파악하고 이해하려는 성향이 나타난다는 사실을 발견하게 되었다. 그 간격이 적을수록 학생들은 교사로부터 학습받은 내용을 자신의 지식으로 재구성하여 새로운 문제에 적용을 쉽게 하였다. 본 발표에서는, 학생들의 수학적 스키마와 선생님들이 가르치는 스키마 사이의 간격을 줄이는 것이 학생들이 수학을 관계적 이해를 하는데 큰 도움을 줄 수 잇음을 보이려고 한다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
• /
• v.41 no.6
• /
• pp.796-806
• /
• 2012

This study was conducted to investigate dietary attitude, and nutritional knowledge of middle school students in Gwangju and examine their perception and utilization of food labeling systems. The total and mean dietary attitude scores were 75 and 49.47, respectively. The total and mean nutrition knowledge scores were 15 and 10.88, respectively. Girls showed significantly higher nutrition knowledge than boys (p<0.01). Overall, 62.9% of respondents checked food labeling, and there were significant differences in dietary attitudes among groups that did and did not checking labeling (p<0.001), with higher dietary attitude being associated with checking the label. Moreover, higher nutritional knowledge was associated with checking the food label. Individuals who checked the food label considered the expiration date (54.9%), product name (14.4%) and price (10.2%). The main reasons for checking food labeling were (in descending order) to confirm the expiration date (61.6%), determine the ingredients and nutritional information, learn how to store the product, and compare the price and weight with other products. The overall satisfaction with the food labeling system was 16.20 out of 30, and significant differences (p<0.001) were observed among individuals with high, moderate and low dietary attitudes, as indicated by satisfaction scores of 17.54, 16.32 and 14.86, respectively. Individuals with high, moderate and low dietary attitudes had nutritional knowledge scores of 15.79, 16.08, and 17.08 respectively. The overall score for understanding nutrition labeling was 4.71 out of 7, and the understanding differed significantly among groups (p<0.01), with those with moderate food attitudes having the highest score.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.30 no.3
• /
• pp.129-149
• /
• 2018

This study has attempted to analyze the achievement standards in the 2015 revised curriculum, based on the revision of Bloom's Taxonomy and aims to identify the knowledge and required competencies in the fourth industrial era. The results of this study are as follows: First, the knowledge dimensions was the highest 'metacognitive knowledge' in middle school, while 'factual knowledge' was the highest in high school, and 'knowledge of specific details and elements' was the highest subtype of all of the knowledge dimensions. The dimensions of the cognitive process, such as the terms 'apply' and 'analyze' in middle school, as 'understand' and 'evaluate' in high school have been treated inattentively. Second, the knowledge dimension and the cognitive process dimension according to key concepts display the metacognitive knowledge and 'understand' in development, the conceptual knowledge and 'understand' in relationship. While the 'metacognitive knowledge' and 'apply' in life culture, the 'procedural knowledge' and 'evaluate' in safety, the 'factual knowledge' and 'apply' in management and the 'metacognitive knowledge' and 'understand' in life design were extremely high. Third, the verbs used in the achievement standards displayed as 'explore', 'understand', 'analyze', 'practice', 'suggest', 'recognize' and 'evaluate'. Since the statement of the action verb is the very basis for determining the performance process, specific competencies may be achieved by reflecting on the actual achievement standards. These standards should provide us with a effective cognitive process for to understand a learner's performance skills and support the direction of the education required, through a strategy that refines the connection between content elements and functions and develop their competences for the future.