• Title/Summary/Keyword: 중국횡단철도

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.029 seconds

중ㆍ한 열차페리시스템 추진현황

  • 우위국
    • Proceedings of the KSR Conference
    • /
    • 2002.05a
    • /
    • pp.129-142
    • /
    • 2002
  • 중국횡단철도(TCR)와 한반도의 연결ㆍ중국횡단철도는 중국 쟝쑤성 렌윈강에서 신장 위그루 자체구의 아라샨커우까지 4,131km의 철로이며 중국의 동부, 중부, 서부의 10개성을 동서방향으로 횡단하는 중국 제1의 동서횡단철로임 ㆍTCR을 이용하면 중국에서 유럽까지의 거리가 시베리아횡단철도(TSR)보다 약 1,500km 짧으며 카자흐스탄, 우즈베키스탄 등 중앙아시아와 이란, 아프가니스탄 등 서아시아까지의 거리는 TSR보다 3,000km이상 짧음(중략)

  • PDF

시베리아 철도 시찰

  • 유광균
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Railway
    • /
    • v.4 no.3
    • /
    • pp.18-25
    • /
    • 2001
  • 국제기구와 우리 정부는 그 동안 아시아 지역과 유럽지역의 경제협력과 발전을 도모하기 위한 철도망 구축 연구와 검토를 지속해 왔다. 극동지역의 철도교통망 구성에 있어서는 한반도와 시베리아 횡단철도(TSR)와의 연결이 중요한 교통 축으로 대두되고 있다. 동북 아시아 지역에서 유럽지역으로의 철도교통루트는 중국횡단철도(TCR), 만주횡단철도(TMR), 몽골횡단철도(TMGR)를 통하여 연결이 가능하며, 이중 한반도와 직접 연결되는 철도는 TCR과 TSR이다. 수송거리와 시간의 단축, 비용의 절감이라는 경제적 이유와 유라시아 물류망 확보라는 측면에서 이들 지역 관계국가들은 깊은 관심을 가지고 있다. (중략)

  • PDF

A research on the development of Lianyungang port (중국 연운항항 발전방향)

  • Ma, Chang-Ming;Jo, So-Hee;Nam, Ki-Chan
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
    • /
    • 2009.10a
    • /
    • pp.206-207
    • /
    • 2009
  • It is estimated that the potential of Chinese market is infinite. The success of Chinese economic reformation is generating the high economic growth in China. China is a rising logistics market as its growing throughput and port expansion but China's railway transportation system is not well-linked with ports. China built TCR(Trans-China Railway) which is across the Chinese territory and connected to as far as Europe. With this mode, it is possible to place more overseas freight and meet more customers' needs. Lian yun gang is a city on the East coast of China where the commencing station of TCR is located. This paper reviews the present conditions of Lianyungang and presents the development direction of the city to become a logistics point.

  • PDF

한국철도와 시베리아 횡단철도 연결의 기술검토방향

  • 신종서
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Railway
    • /
    • v.3 no.3
    • /
    • pp.10-21
    • /
    • 2000
  • 한국철도는 1899. 9. 18. 노량진∼인천간 33.8 km를 개통한 이래 1905. 1. 1. 경부선 영등포∼초량간 431.2 km. 1906. 4. 3. 경의선 용산∼신의주간 527.8 km를 개통하여 1912. 6. 15. 부산∼중국장춘간 직통열차를 운행하였고. 1927. 8. 1 시베리아 경유 아시아. 유럽 각국간과 여객 및 화물운송을 개시한 이래 1945. 8. 15. 2차 세계대전이 종전할 때까지 18년간 부산-서울-평양-신의주-중국과 시베리아를 경유하여 유럽각국과 연결 운행되었다.(중략)

  • PDF

The Study of Establishing the Multi-pass Eurasian Railroads (유라시아 철도의 다중경로 구축에 관한 연구)

  • Hahm, Beom-Hee;Huh, Nam-Kyun;Hurr, Hee-Young
    • Korean Business Review
    • /
    • v.21 no.2
    • /
    • pp.137-170
    • /
    • 2008
  • This study is presenting the logistics strategy in the international logistics markets which makes competition and corporation among north-east Asian countries to establishing the multi-pass Eurasian railroads. The countries located in north-east area of Eurasia like China, Japan, Russia and Korea are paying higher costs and disutility to the transportations and communications due to repeated conflicts and confrontations causes from the politic problems. They are being used surface transportation for most of all logistics between Europe and Asia except special merchandises because of characteristic of cargo to be air, the Silk Road remains vestige only which was main logistic passage to this area since BC. So far the Trans-Siberian Railway is being used by Russia mostly as north of Eurasian transport because of difficulties of service. The Trans-China Railway built in 1992 is not accomplishing as a international logistic passages. It is expected to take a long lead time because of characteristic of resource development and poor logistic infrastructure to the countries like Uzbekistan, double landlocked country, Mongolia and Azerbaijan, the countries do not be adjacent to the sea, even they have great economic jump-up plans through the development of their own resources. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization(SCO) start to sail officially in 2001 is constructed with China, Russia, Tadzhikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan as regular members of 6 countries and Mongolia, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran as observers 5 countries. It is started as a military alliance to protect terror, but now, it is expended to cooperate with the traffic, transportation, trade and share of energies. The Russia is doing their best to activate TSR as a government target to developnorth area equivalently, and economic develop of far-east Siberia. And also it is agreed provisionally to improve and repair of rail road between Nahjin and Hassan to connect TSR and TKR( Trans-Korea Railroad) by Russia, North Korea and South Korea with Russian's aggressive efforts. The development plan of this area is over lapped with GTI(Greater Tumen Initiative) promoted by UNDP, and is a cooperated project by 5 countries of South Korea, Mongolia, China, Russia and North Korea, subject to review the appropriation of energy, tour, environment, rail road connection between Mongolia and China and establishing a ferry route to north-east Asia. It is Japanese situation to pay attention to Russia and China even they have been supplying large-scope of infrastructure in Mongol area without any charges, target to get East Asia Main Rail Road to connect Mongolia and Zalubino of Russia. In case of the program for the Denuclearization of North Korea is not creeping, it will be accelerated to connect the TKR and TSR, TKR and TCR by somehow attending United States, including developing program promoted by UN ESCAP. As the result, Korean peninsular will continue the central role of competition and cooperation as in the past, now and future of north-east Asia, as of geographical-economics and geographical-politics whether it is requested or not wanted by neighbor countries.

  • PDF

A Study on Alternatives for Activating a North Corridor of the Trans Asian Railway according to The Opening of a Cross-Border Freight Railway Service between South and North Korea (남북간 화물열차 개통이후 TAR북부노선 연계.활성화를 위한 대안 연구)

  • Yun, Dong-Hee
    • Proceedings of the KSR Conference
    • /
    • 2008.06a
    • /
    • pp.2303-2315
    • /
    • 2008
  • Finally, Musan-Bongdong section in Kyeong-Ui corridor opened on 11. DEC.2007, which is a historical event, because this connection means the restoration of 56 yrs' disconnection since 1951 and also starting point launching to connect china, Mongolia, Russia for continental railway logistic infrastructure. This is also one of master plans about the northern line in TAR, carried out by UNESCAP, so this study will touch up each country's railway status and the next tasks related with trans-continental railway such as North Korea, Russia, China. Also, this study reveal a mid-long term development strategy to improve the North Korea railroad for a continent rail link and international railroad transportation between China and Russia, and also checks the way of confrontation to the domestic infrastructure for the activation of the continent railway and the north and south, investigates concretely how to establish TAR northern part routes as soon as possible.

  • PDF

Simulating Logistics Changes in South Korea Caused by Trans-Eurasia Logistics Passing through North Korea (북한 통관 유라시아 횡단 물류에 따른 국내 물류 변화 시뮬레이션 분석)

  • Jung, Jae Un
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.16 no.7
    • /
    • pp.199-211
    • /
    • 2018
  • Ever since Korea was geopolitically divided into North and South Korea in the 1940s, South Korea has depended on maritime transportation for global trade and logistics. Now, however, South Korea is preparing to develop a new global route for trans-Eurasia logistics passing through North Korea. Even though there are difficulties to overcome, South Korea expects that a new overland route, shorter than the existing seaways in the Europe-Asia section, will bring more frequent trade with more rapid and cost-effective logistics services in the future. Related to this issue, this study aims to proactively analyze dynamic logistics changes in South Korea when a trans-Korea railway is developed and linked with the trans-China railway and the trans-Siberian railway. This study employed a system dynamics simulation approach to model the logistics system in South Korea. The simulation results indicated that the traffic of the Uiwang inland container depot near the capital area may increase but the traffic of the Port of Busan may decrease. With supplementary research, consequently, follow-up studies on adjusting the traffic capacity in Korea are required to attain successful trans-Eurasia logistics by rail.

A Study on the Korean Current Status and Strategy Directions of International Logistical Transport Route: With the Case of Trans Korean Peninsula Railway (한국 국제물류운송루트의 실태와 전략 방향 - 한반도 대륙횡단철도를 중심으로 -)

  • Kim, Hong-seop
    • Journal of Distribution Science
    • /
    • v.4 no.1
    • /
    • pp.53-78
    • /
    • 2006
  • We call this world network society. Logistics is one of important network systems which connect people, materials and information. The World Economy Conditions of 21st Century has been Changed so rapidly. These Changes are more conspicuous in Northeast Asia than other Regions. China, North Korea and Russia have reformed their Economical and Social Systems, which enlarged the Trade Volume and Traffic Demand in this Area and between Europe. The Railway System Crossing the Eurasia Continent, such as TSR(Trans Siberian Railway), TCR(Trans China Railway), TMR(Trans Manchuria Railway), TMGR(Trans Mongolia Railway) and TKR(Trans Korea Railway), have been becoming very important to enhance the International Transportation efficiency and to connect each continents by International Railways. This Paper investigated and surveyed the logistical Environments surrounding this Korea Peninsula. And concerned with the Crossing Continents Railway, TSR,TCR(TMR, TMGR), TKR, operating Conditions and Tasks that must be considered and solved were also investigated. Especially the Current Logistical Conditions of China, Russia, and North Korea and their Problems were surveyed. And the SWOT of these Railways were analyzed and compared. The Visions and Goals of these Inter-Continental Railways were suggested in terms of their Rationalization of Operations and efficient Connections among many Countries. Not only the Policies and Strategies/Tactics which should be considered but also and Many detail countermeasures which should be introduced and adopted were suggested.

  • PDF

Trans-Korea Rail Logistics Strategy for the Normalization of South and North Korea Economic Cooperation (남북경제협력 정상화를 대비한 철도 물류망 구축 방안)

  • Kim, Jeong Hyun;Kim, Gang Seog;Kim, Yong Jin;Yu, Jeong Whon
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.36 no.3
    • /
    • pp.511-520
    • /
    • 2016
  • It is essential to connect the railroads between South and North Korea in order to the implementation of the Eurasia initiatives and prepare for the normalization of the economic cooperation between south and north Korea as well as the unification. This study provides the strategy to establish the rail logistics network for the normalized trades between south and north Korea, and the accommodation of the logistics demands to China and Russia. The alternative routes were designated and the costs for the rehabilitation were estimated, and suggested the priority for the investment. The Trans-China Rail is prior to the Trans-Siberia Rail in terms of the utility for the logistics and the political value. In connection to the TSR, it is desirable to pass the Seoul-Gyeonggi area where the demand is greater than the other area. This route is limited by the restriction in the capacity, then the Gyeonggi Ring Rail route may be necessary.

A Study on the Economic Validity of TSR Connecting TKR (TKR과 연계한 TSR의 경제적 타당성에 관한 연구)

  • Choi, Kyoung-Hoon;Park, Gyei-Kark;Lee, Roman R.;Yoon, Dae-Gwun
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.345-351
    • /
    • 2012
  • The major trade area of the South Korea is divided into Asia, America and Europe. Generally, marine transportation is the main method of mass cargo transportation, but unlike others, rail transportation is available in the Europe area. Also, as a result of China's growth, South Korea's position as northeast Asia logistics hub has weakened. That is the reason why we need to pay attention to rail transportation, an alternative competitive structure. In accordance with this background, this study focuses on analyzing economic feasibility comparing transportation routes to Europe using Trans-Korea Railway and Trans-Siberia Railway. Factors of analysis are transportation distance, period, cost and additional cost As the result, considering economic feasibility, TKR-TSR route(Route1) is the best transportation approach for six routes. Therefore, using TKR-TSR railway will be the best way to increase nation's competitiveness, in response to Russia government's far-east development strategy.