• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.217-241
• /
• 2011

The basic purpose of Customs Drawback System of the material for export goods is export support as cut a price down the export goods' price. Especially the trade volume between South Korea and China is the greatest in comparison with other countries in 2010. Therefore companies involved China is necessary to understand exactly for China's tariff system(duty drawback system). Due to inconsistent policies, it is difficult to understand VAT-related provisions on exports goods of China compared with South Korea Tax System. Accordingly, the results of this study is significant in China-related companies. In South Korea and China, amount of customs duty drawback is very large 4.017606 billion won 732.8 billion yuan respectively. Thus, the amount of customs duty drawback is greater, a comparison of customs duty drawback in South Korea and China is very necessary on Customs Drawback System.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.117-142
• /
• 2014

China having largest market in the world, has been criticized by its trading partner countries due to its unfair trade practices, particularly in the field of anti-dumping regulation. The main reasons for such criticism seem to come from the incomplete anti-dumping law as instrument to protect the industry concerned. In 2001, though new anti-dumping law was established to replace the former one by revising it to meet the needs for economic development which should be secured for china to take part in the competition world as the new member of WTO. The provisions concerned have been evaluated not to be sufficient and efficient from the viewpoint of the safeguard mechanism, while are required to be modified to meet the real world of international trade law. I consider that as the biggest partner of chinese trade activity, we will need to maintain a well understanding of the Chinese anti-dumping regulations. So this report conducts the Chinese anti-dumping regulations, compares between the chinese regulations and the WTO agreement, and studies deeply in to the problems and the improvements of the Chinese anti-dumping regulations.

• Korean Deer Journal
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.8-8
• /
• 2005

미국산 사슴고기 수입 `진위` 논란 - 중국, 한국 녹용수입제도 `시비` - 관세청, 불법녹용 단속 강화 - 군 훈련소음 피해 국가가 배상해야

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.42 no.2
• /
• pp.297-318
• /
• 2017

This study reviews the origin verification system of China via literature research and analyzes cases of Korean exports origin disapproved of Chinese customs clearance, to provide origin verification strategy recommendations for Korean companies exporting to China under Korea-China FTA. We reviewed the provisions of Chinese rules of origin and analyzed origin disapproved cases gathered from various presentations. The main results of the study have the following implications; First, the customs authority needs to establish a consultation channel with the customs authority of China, and origin certification issuing agencies should provide exporters with consulting services in the certificate issuing stage to reduce verification risk. Second, exporters need to pay attention to the formal requirements of the proof of origin, utilize the advance rulings program of differences in classification of items between Korea and China, and monitor regulatory change in China.

• NEWSLETTER 전기공업
• /
• no.92-18 s.61
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 1992

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.28 no.12
• /
• pp.267-279
• /
• 2023

The objective of this paper is to examine the legal framework governing the import and export of grain in China, a pivotal factor in shaping policies aimed at stabilizing South Korea's foreign trade and grain imports. Through this analysis, it is observed that China's foreign trade system, governed by the Foreign Trade Act, exhibits a notable absence of clear delineation regarding the scope and responsibility for the delegation of authority to foreign trade management agencies. In contrast, Korea's Foreign Trade Law, along with its enforcement decree and management regulations, explicitly outlines the scope and responsibilities pertaining to the delegation of authority to foreign trade management. However, in the case of China's revised Foreign Trade Law, there exists a lack of precision in specifying the delegation of authority to foreign trade management. This creates a potential for discretionary intervention by local governments or other administrative bodies. While China's legal system concerning grain imports and exports aligns with WTO regulations in its institutional framework, attention is warranted due to the vagueness in laws or regulations, as well as the presence of irrational and non-transparent procedures during system operation. As conclusion remarks, while China's legal structure related to grain imports and exports conforms to WTO guidelines overall, the identified issues such as legal ambiguity and non-transparent procedures underscore the need for caution. To safeguard against potential challenges in future trade interactions with China, proactive measures are crucial to address these concerns.

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• s.126
• /
• pp.61-64
• /
• 2012

우리나라는 오래전부터 국제화 시대에 돌입하여 치열한 무역전쟁을 벌이고 있다. 특히 2007년 미국과 무역장벽을 완화하거나 철폐하는 FTA(Free Trade Agreement; 자유무역협정)를 체결하였으며, 앞으로 미국뿐만 아니라 EU, 중국과의 FTA가 체결되면 더 많은 품종종류와 물량이 자유로이 수출 입 될 것이기에 이에 대비하여야 할 것이다. FTA는 관세를 제로로 만들겠다는 것이기에 통상적으로 제한점이 없어져서 수출입 물량이 더욱 늘어나게 될 것이다. 과거 1992년 중국수교 이후 무역 물량이 증가하고, WTO 이후에도 물량이 급증하였다. 또한, 우리나라는 2002년 UPOV(The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants; 국제 식물 신품종 보호 동맹)에 51번째 회원국으로 가입하면서 본격적인 식물신품종보호제도가 시작되었다. UPOV는 품종보호를 위한 정부 간 기구로서 새로운 식물 품종에 대한 품종보호권리의 부여는 그 소유자에게 그 보호품종의 생산 판매에 대하여 배타적인 권리를 주는 것이다. 조경수 품종의 경우 품종보호권리는 보호품종의 과실, 꽃, 수형 및 기타 부산물과 관상적 가치 등 제반 형질을 상업적 목적으로 번식하는 권리에 대하여 배타적 독점권을 주는 것을 의미한다. 우리나라는 2008년에 조경수로 벚나무, 단풍나무, 느티나무 3종을 품종보호 대상수종으로 지정될 계획이며 2009년부터는 모든 수종으로 확대되었다. 우리나라의 국제적인 지위가 향상되면서 국제간에 무역 및 식물자원이 치열하게 각축하는 시대에 본격적으로 돌입하였다. 이에 따라 조경수 분야에서도 이에 대한 치밀한 대비책이 필요하게 되었다. 본고에서는 첨예화하는 국제화 시대를 대비하여 우리나라의 조경수 수 출입 현황을 파악하고 앞으로의 조경수 생산 및 연구 방향에 대하여 미력하나마 살펴보고자 한다.

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.469-493
• /
• 2011

This paper attempts to examine the economic impact of technological barrier to trade(TBT) between Korea and China by using international input-output approach. With the tariff/quota reduced or eliminated since WTO's launch, the interest in TBT as a non-tariff barrier has been increased, and then there have so far been a large number of empirical studies on quantifying its effect in foreign. But still this area of study in Korea is limited in the literature survey. In encouraged in this situation, focusing on bilateral trade between Korea and China, which has been significantly increased in recent years, we have tried to estimates the impact of TBT on their output and employment. We use Asian International Input-Output Table(AIIO) for the year 2000 published by IDE-JETRO, and also use the estimated sectoral TBT provided by Ha et al.(2010). According to the result, there will be generated $3.63 billions values in outputs, and 18.1 millions persons in employments at most. And also we found that there is weak interdependence in sectoral and spatial linkage between two countries.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.79-102
• /
• 2014

A parallel importation is a non-counterfeit product imported from another country without the permission of the intellectual property owner. It is caused by price differences between countries. Therefore parallel importation are implication in issues of international trade and intellectual property rights(hereafter referred as IPR). This paper provides parallel importation issues of Korea and China under the IPR laws such as patent, trademarks, copyright and analyzes difference between two countries. In China, patent law regulates exhaustion rights which is based theory of a parallel import for the first time unlike trademark law and copyright law. On the other hands, Korea rules parallel importing under Korean customs regulations. In conclusion, two countries have no provisions that advocate a parallel import under IPR laws. This paper suggests some improvements to overcome the limitation of current regulation system and avoid trade friction between two countries. First of all, two countries should clearly make a rule about parallel import in IPR law such as definition of parallel importation, genuine goods, permission conditions, importing proses, penalty and remedy etc. Secondly, two countries should prohibit an abuse of a exclusive import agent's rights and manage a parallel importer not to cause consumer's complain about goods to expansion parallel imports. Finally, two countries should cooperate not to cause disputes about this issue with a communication channel.

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.573-600
• /
• 2009

Currently, the Free Trade Agreement(FTA) promoting regionalism or bilateralism has been increasingly concluded, which is against multilateralism of the WTO. The adoption of the TRS under the FTA carries various issues from the rationale of its existence to its contents. To explain these contradictory issues between the WTO and the FTA, this paper studied on the TRS by analyzing present cases and negotiation results of the TRS under the FTA and comparing them under the WTO. The TRS under the WTO agreement is limited only to antidumping, countervailing duties and safeguard as the agreed concept. When the negotiations of the FTA are on the process, it is necessary to adopt the TRS depending on the negotiating party countries of the FTA after considering fully the economic situations of Korea and the need of protection for the domestic industries. Currently, Korea has entered into the FTA with several countries and most of the agreements with respect to the TRS maintain and observe the right and duty in the WTO agreement and when necessary, in some of the FTA agreements, they have changed parts of the TRS. Consequently, it is needed to establish the basis for application of the TRS. Also, additional application of the SSG provision to some sensitive goods is highly recommended.