• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.563-581
• /
• 2016

Studies on meta-affect in problem solving tried to build similar structures among affective elements as the structure of cognition and meta-cognition. But it's still need to be more systematic as meta-cognition. This study defines meta-affect as the connection of cognitive elements and affective elements which always include at least one affective element. We logically categorized types of meta-affect in problem solving, and then observed and analyzed the real cases for each type of meta-affect based on the logical categories. We found the operating mechanism of meta-affect in mathematical problem solving. In particular, we found the characteristics of meta function which operates in the process of problem solving. Finally, this study contributes in efficient analysis of meta-affect in problem solving and educational implications of meta-affect in teaching and learning in problem solving.

• The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.47-57
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to verify the effectiveness of a CT-CPS(Computational Thinking-based Creative Problem Solving) instructional model on the cognitive and the affective area of middle school students' software class. To achieve our goal, we explored theoretical background and designed a lesson plan based on CT-CPS instructional model. Then we analyzed our experimental results after applying the lesson plan to middle school students. We performed our experiment to an experimental group by using our CT-CPS instructional model-based lesson plans, and we carried out three pre and post tests about cognitive and affective area, i.e. creative problem solving ability, meta cognition and motivation of learning. As a result, most of the test factors were statistically improved, so the effectiveness of the CT-CPS instructional model on the cognitive and the affective area of middle school students' software class was verified.

• Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.379-387
• /
• 2007

The purpose of the study was to explore the correlation between in-degree and out-degree centrality Social Network Indices and cognitive and affective learning outcomes measures in an e-Learning environment. Results indicate both the out-degree and in-degree centrality indices are correlated with the cognitive learning outcome measures only. Further, results of the follow-up multiple regression analyses describe the cognitive learning outcome would be predicted by both the in-degree centrality (52%) and out-degree centrality (8%). A discussion is provided to interpret the results and limitations are specified.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.14 no.8
• /
• pp.505-516
• /
• 2014

This study was aimed at identifying the influence of Creative Thinking Filtering Mode program in international gifted program: how much it influences to improve the cognitive domains of creativity (fluency, flexibility, originality) and affective domains of creativity (independence, curiosity, diversity, sensitivity, sense of humor, individuality. To analyze data, ANCOVA(Analysis of Covariance)test was conducted, and the results are as belows. Firstly, the group applied in CTFM program was higher than controlled group on the domains of cognitive and affective. Specifically, in the factors of fluency, flexibility and originality among three cognitive domains and factors of individuality.In affective domains of creativity, independence, curiosity, diversity, a sense of humor among the five factors except of sensitivity were higher. Secondly, the result of analyzing the difference between before and after applying CTFM program was that three elements in cognitive domains : fluency, flexibility and originality improved, especially, the fluency was the most improved. Thirdly, the result of analyzing the difference of affective factor between before and after applying CTFM program was that the originality, diversity, a sense of humor and individuality among the 6 elements of affective domain improved, especially the individuality was the most improved.

• Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.546-558
• /
• 2003

Social justice has been an interest of whole geographers for almost four decades. The conception of social justice includes fairness and equity in the distribution of a wide range of attributes. The purpose of this study is to understand social justice in geography of welfare. The theories of social justice are needed to describe relationship between social justice and geography of welfare. The evaluation of spatial variations in welfare is closely associated with social justice. Equality, equity, efficiency, and fairness are the reasonable criteria to apply to the evaluation of distributions of welfare, relating to distributive(or territorial) justice. However, there are complications in the spatial application of welfare evaluation criteria, including access across space, boundary crossing and ecological fallacy.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.18 no.10
• /
• pp.306-319
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to improve a good sense of language through professors' reduced role and university students' cooperative learning with overcoming the limit of existing English teaching materials and learning methods. To analyze the effect of cooperative learning in university general English classes on the improvement of English speaking ability and affective achievement, cooperative learning for English speaking was applied to 50 university students of K university in Seoul for 4 months from March 2 to June 20 in 2018. And then the affective achievement was verified. The results of this study are as follows. Frist, the cooperative learning in university general English classes made a difference in the improvement of English speaking ability (accuracy, fluency, complexity). Second, the cooperative learning in university general English classes made a difference in confidence of learning and interest in learning among the affective achievement but there's no difference in study attitude and learning motivation. Third, the cooperative learning in university general English classes made a difference in the effect of the improvement of English speaking ability (accuracy, fluency, complexity) on the confidence of learning and interest in learning of the affective achievement, but there's no difference in study attitude and learning motivation.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.33 no.spc
• /
• pp.709-719
• /
• 1998

오늘날 세계는 물질적으로 풍요롭게 되었지만, 생태위기의 발생과 더불어 환경문데를 둘러싼 불평등이 감소하기 보다는 오히려 증대하고 있다. 21세기를 위한 새로운 패러다임으로서 생태학은 이러한 불평등을 극복하기 위한 지식 및 실천으로서 '환경정의'의 개념 또는 이론을 필요로 한다. 진정한 환경정의론은 한편으로 생태학의 규범적 측면들을 발전시키면서 다른 한편으로 이의 이데올로기의 동원을 막을 수 있는 이론적 및 실천적 토대가 될 것으로 기대된다. 환경정의에 관한 개념적 연구는 주로 사회정의에 관한 철학적 전통, 특히 자유론, 공리주의, 계약론을 포괄하는 자유주의적 정의론, 맑스주의적 정의론 및 포스트모던 정의론 등에서 도출된 주요 개념들을 자연환경에 확대시키고자 한다. 환경정의에 관한 몇몇 학자들, 대표적으로 벤쯔(Wenz), 하비(Harvey), 로와 그리슨 (Low and Gleeson) 등은 다양한 전통을 위에서 제시한 (환경)정의론들을 면밀히 고찰하여, 이들 각각의 한계를 제시하거나 문제점들을 지적하고, 나아가 이들을 종합하고자 했다. 이들의 연구는 환경정의에 관한 다양한 이론들의 특성을 이해하는데 많은 도움을 주지만, 그 자체로 일관성 있는 이론으로 발전하지는 못했다. 이 글에서 제시되는 환경정의론은 인간들 간의 관계, 자연과 인간들 간의 물질적 관계, 그리고 상징적 관계 등에 상응하도록 정의를 3가지 차원, 즉 분배적 정의, 생산적 정의, 승인적 정의로 구분하고자 한다. 이들은 각각 필요의 원칙, 노동의 원칙, 그리고 의사소통의 원칙에 기초하며, 또한 각각 자유주의적, 특히 롤즈의 정의론, 맑스주의 정의론, 그리고 비판이론이나 포스트모던 정의론에서 많은 시사점들을 얻을 수 있다.

• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.1
• /
• pp.31-43
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to identify a domain-specificity of the scientific creativity and the component of scientific creativity. Conducted from theoretical study, this study suggests that a domain-specific view of creativity offers a more useful and constructive components of scientific creativity based on the literature associated with the component of scientific creativity. Scientific creativity has a domain-specific component and so there is need to distinguish scientific creativity from creativity in general. As a result, scientific creativity is different from other creativity it is concerned with scientific knowledge, science process skill, creative scientific problem finding and solving and so on. And since scientific creativity is a kind of ability, it is possible to improve through a scientific creativity program.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.06a
• /
• pp.363-375
• /
• 2006

본 연구에서는 청소년들을 대상으로 정의적 특성으로 분류해 온 도덕성의 성격과 발달 수준을 찾아 이를 기초하여 학생들의 자기 이해를 돕고 정의적 성숙을 가져올 수 있게 하는 자기 평가식 도덕성검사를 Kohlberg의 도덕성 발달 수준을 기반으로 한 온라인 도덕성 검사 시스템을 설계 및 구현하는 방법을 연구하였다. 구현된 시스템을 이용하여 학생들 스스로 자신의 도덕성을 진단하고 평가하여 자기중심성으로 부터 벗어나 협동과 상호존중의 관계를 지향할 수 있는 학생이 되도록 하는 것이 이 연구의 주요한 목적이다. 본 연구에서 설계하고 구현한 도덕성검사 시스템이 성공적으로 적용된다면 검사와 검사의 결과에 대한 진로안내가 한 시스템 내에서 이루어지기 때문에 학생들의 진로지도에 대한 효율적인 성과를 가져올 수 있을 것이며, 또한 쉽고 빠른 검사로 인해 지필검사를 통해 실시하는 것보다 훨씬 경제적인 효과를 올릴 수 있을 것이다.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.52
• /
• pp.111-132
• /
• 2018

The way of approaching 'the relationship between love and justice' varies from person to person. We can argue for superiority of love or for superiority of justice by understanding the relationship between the two as conflicting. We can also argue that we need each other by understanding each other as a complementary relationship rather than an oppositional relationship. Hegel, however, sees love and justice as independent constitutive principles valid in different areas and does not regard the two as opposing nor complementary. This can only be understood when the structure of Hegel's theory of recognition is properly assumed. The relationship between love and justice will be considered mainly in Hegel's theory of recognition. Key philosophical points of Hegel's theory of recognition and consequences drawn on the relationship between love and justice on the basis of the theory will be examined. This can be summarized in the form of a thesis, roughly as follows. - Hegel presents love, justice and solidarity, that are various forms of recognition, to a family, a civil society and a state, that are three forms of social relations, as their constitutive principles. He does not grasp the relationship between love and justice as oppositional nor as complementary, that is different from many people's general perspective on the relationship of the two. - In Hegel's theory of recognition, love and justice differ in the areas in which they are valid. Love is a valid principle in the intimacy, and justice is a valid principle in non-intimacy. So, if justice and rights are asserted in intimacy, the area of intimacy is destroyed. Conversely, if love is asserted in non-intimacy, it cannot exercise real influence. - In the political community such as a state, where intimacy and non-intimacy overlap each other, the principle of solidarity is needed as a new constitutive principle, since a state does not stand on the principle of love as in a family nor on the principle of justice as in a civil society.