• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.152
• /
• pp.85-91
• /
• 2003

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.662-686
• /
• 2009

Lately innovation is perceived as a systemic, horizontal phenomenon and requires a new governance for innovation. Subsequently, broader societal questions enter the domain of innovation policy and coordination and integration between innovation policy and various other policy domains, such as economic, educational, social, regional and environmental policies become crucial. Definitions of policy integration include terms such as coherence, cooperation, coordination and put great emphasis on joint working to promote synergies among policies and reduce duplication and the use of the same goals to formulate policy. As innovation capabilities of the private sector have improved and it has become unclear who to catch up with, the Korean government, a leading player in the process of "catch-up," is likely to have more difficulties in maintaining the old way of planning and executing policies. The Korean government is now under the pressure of planning technologies and policies that do not allow any easy imitation or copy of other advanced countries longer, which in turn reveals various limits of the existing policy framework. Policy integration involves a continual process demanding changes in political, organizational and procedural activities. To ensure long term and cross sectoral innovation policy, overall change and improvement in policy and its implementation needed in terms of political commitments, governance systems, policy instruments and monitoring, and evaluation systems.

• 정보화사회
• /
• s.132
• /
• pp.7-22
• /
• 1999

정부는 2004년까지 우리나라를 정보통신대국으로 끌어올린다는 야심찬 목표를 세우고 이를 실현하기 위한 정보통신 기술개발 5개년 계획을 최근 발표했다. 차세대 인터넷 기반기술 확보 등 정보통신산업 발달을 위한 정부의 정책과 비전을 살펴본다.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.191
• /
• pp.64-67
• /
• 2006

그동안 정부는 국내 부동산 시장을 옥죄는 정책을 펼칠 뿐만 아니라 해외 주택 거래에 대해서도 부정적인 태도를 보여왔다. 그런 정부에서 해외 부동산을 취득하라고 빗장을 조심스레 열어주었다. 지난 3월 초부터 시행된 '외환거래규제 완화 방안'에 대한 내용과 관련 업계, 실수요지들의 반응을 살펴보자.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.137
• /
• pp.7-11
• /
• 2005

산학협력에 있어 중앙정부와 지방정부의 정책적 지원은 더욱 강화되어야 하며, 대학은 경쟁력있고 특성화된 산학협력 모델을 다양하게 개발하여야 하고, 대학과 기업 간의 신뢰 구축과 상호 이해의 폭을 획기적으로 넓혀 나가야 대학의 산학협력단은 소기의 목적을 달성할 수 있다.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.201
• /
• pp.36-37
• /
• 2007

국제통화기금(IMF) 위기 이후 경기 부양책의 일환으로 풀어주었던 분양가 규제 정책이 8년 만에 다시 되살아났다. 불안한 부동산 시장을 안정시키기 위한 정부발 해결책일 순 있겠으나 시장 논리에 맞지 않는다는 주장 또한 만만치 않다. 정부와 건설 업계의 서로 다른 입장에 대해 살펴보자.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.194
• /
• pp.92-93
• /
• 2006

아파트 값을 높이려는 '부녀회의 집값 담합'에 정부가 칼을 들었다. 하지만 정부의 규제 일변도의 정책에 대한 반감도 만만찮다. 또한 앞으로 이러한 담합에 대해 형사처벌까지 가능하도록 한 개정안에 대해 법리상 문제가 있다는 논란도 끊이질 않고 있다. 아파트 값 담합의 법리적 논쟁에 대해 알아보았다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.9 no.12
• /
• pp.843-852
• /
• 2009

World water industry market is about 400~500 billion dollar, and to be expected to most promising industry in 21 century. Israel and Singapore, in spite of water shortage nation, have global competency in water industry through active formation policy of central government and public enterprise. Israel government made various policies for development of water industry including water cluster policy, and the water public enterprise, Mekorot, executed them. There are more than 200 venture companies in water cluster, and it created 8000 jobs, accomplished export of 1billion dollar. Singapore government recognized potentials of water industry early, propelled water industry formation policy with the help of related departments of government, and Singapore public water enterprise, PUB, played key roles to carry out specific policies. Singapore established grand plan to become Global Hydrohub in 2015, drives it progressively. Korean government should behold potentials of water industry, and develop various policies to enforce water industry competency, integrate related affairs in a department, and invest to make global water cluster with the help of K-water and local government.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.310-333
• /
• 2007

This paper introduces a relative comparative advantage index and a composite concentration index of university research activity in science and technology. Three hypotheses were tested regarding differences of degree of concentration based on the size of government R&D fund, location of university, and source of foundation, respectively. T-test results imply that there are significant differences of concentration based on the size of R&D fund and source of foundation, while location of university does not show a significant difference. The paper generally suggests that the lesser size of government R&D fund would lead higher level of concentration, and public funded universities tend to maintain far higher concentration ratio. The paper contributes by introducing relevant indexes for analyzing university research competence, concentration and competitiveness, and hence by proposing policy direction and implication for university competitiveness policy.

• Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.164-173
• /
• 2008

Since the Labour Party became in power in 1997, the national government of UK has undertaken the devolution in regional development policy (e.g.,establishment of Regional Development Agencies and regional assemblies across England) significantly and consistently. Given this situation, this work examines one important institutional cornerstone for the devolution in regional development policy which has been unfolded at the level of a Region of UK. Particularly, we discuss the budget programme of Single Pot (or Single Programme) through which the UK national government has financed RDAs across England since 2002, each RDA's pursuit of regional development targets on which it is required to agree with the national government in return for the Single Pot, and the national government's monitoring of each RDA's performance against the targets. Additionally, our work briefly deals with the implications as well as the challenges which the devolution in regional development policy of UK can present to the Korean context where the devolved approach to regional development policy is increasingly needed.