• Title/Summary/Keyword: 정부출연 연구기관의 연구원

Search Result 74, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

A Measure on Technology Transfer Activation of Government-Sponsored Research Institutes Focusing on Companies in Demand: Focusing on the Cases in the K Research Institute (수요기업 중심의 정부출연연구기관 기술이전 활성화 방안: K 연구원 사례를 중심으로)

  • Hwhang, Hyun-dug;Chung, Sun-yang
    • Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
    • /
    • v.18 no.2
    • /
    • pp.318-337
    • /
    • 2015
  • Although the government continues to increase its investment into R&D, the technology transfer or commercialization success rate of the government- sponsored research institutes was lower than the investment. This research suggested the method of successful technology transfer through case study of technology transfer of the government-sponsored research institutes. Based on the case analysis of three types of technology transfer programs (corporate-demand model, technology-based model, and consortium-focused model) conducted by the K research institute, the study explained in detail that the technology transfer method by discovering potential companies in need is more effective compared to the general technology transfer marketing that advertises the technologies obtained by the research institutes to companies. In addition, since the preliminary R&D planning that considers the needs of the companies in demand has positive influences on the results of technology transfer, this study implied the importance of the strategic R&D planning.

A Study on Current Status and Improvement Tasks of Records Classification in Government-funded Research Institutes (정부출연연구기관의 기록분류 현황과 개선과제)

  • Lee, Mi-Young
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.53
    • /
    • pp.229-259
    • /
    • 2017
  • The purpose of this study is to find out the level of the classification system of the government-funded research institutes and to search the future direction of the classification scheme of these research institutes. As a result of analyzing the classification system and regulations of the 23 government-funded research institutes, it is found that the regulations of the records management of most institutions are basically based on other regulations before Public Records Act. In addition, there are not many institutions in which the record production system that reflects the Public Records Act is introduced, and the production and classification of the records are performed separately, and the classification scheme in which the organization classification and the functional classification are mixed is often used only as a reference tool for setting retention period. To overcome this situation, it is necessary to improve the regulation, classification scheme and system. The revision of the law at the national level and establishment of records management regulations at the institutional level should be made. A special classification scheme for 'research' which is a core function of the research institute should be designed and this classification scheme must be applied from the registration stage of records. The fact that the record management obligation is ignored and the production records are not properly managed is to deny the value of the research field records by themselves. I hope that the records management of government-funded research institutes will be moved in place as soon as possible and practical issues will be communicated to academia and good ideas for better development will be returned to the field of practice.

Current Status and User Experiences of the Science-Related YouTube Services by Government-Funded Research Institutes (정부출연연구기관의 과학 유튜브 서비스 현황과 이용자 경험 연구)

  • Byun, Kwanjoo;Oh, Sanghee
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.52 no.4
    • /
    • pp.277-307
    • /
    • 2021
  • This study aims to understand the current status of science-related channels on YouTube provided by government-funded research institutes and investigate user experiences and behaviors of using the services. We examined the number of subscribers, view counts, and video contents of 26 YouTube channels from the government-funded research institutes. We also designed a user study with the uses and gratifications theory and conducted a semi-structured interview. By grouping videos into five categories: Public Relations, Lectures, Entertainment, Vlogs, and Q&A, most videos were about research projects or institutional promotions. User motivation for using the YouTube channel was to acquire scientific knowledge and information. Users thought that YouTube channels could provide reliable information and satisfy their intellectual curiosity. But they criticized that most videos were uninteresting, and the lack of promotions of the channels made others hesitant to sign up and watch. Findings from this study could help fully understand the current status of the government-funded research institute's YouTube channel and be used as resources for the government's planning and development of various YouTube services.