• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.30 no.5 s.336
• /
• pp.70-74
• /
• 1997

개방화시대, 21세기 선진국 대열로 진입하기 위해서는 과학기술의 발전없이는 불가능하다. 과학기술의 발전을 위해서는 과학기술에 종사하는 전문가들의 헌신적인 노력과 뚜렷한 사명감이 절실한데 그들은 지금 어떤 환경에 있으며 어떤 의식을 갖고 있나, 국내ㆍ외에 거주하는 과학기술자 1천2백69명을 대상으로 서면에 의한 설문조사를 했다. 이 설문조사는 한국과학재단의 지원으로 박택규(건국대교수), 이걸삼(과총사무처장) 그리고 필자가 공동으로 수행했는데 이번호에는 우리나라에 유치되어있는 고급기술자 1백50명과 재외 한국인과학기술자 3백50명 등 모두 5백명을 대상으로 한 해외한국과학기술자의 의식조사 내용을 소개한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.535-546
• /
• 2017

국가 R&D 사업에 대한 예비타당성조사 시 R&D 중복성에 대한 검토는 중복된 투자를 방지하여 재정 투자의 효율성을 높이는데 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 예비타당성조사 담당자들을 대상으로 중복성 검토에 대한 중요요인, 개선사항, 판단기준, 판단주체에 대한 설문조사 분석을 진행하였고, 외부 전문가 그룹의 인식차이와 비교하였다. 설문조사 결과에 대한 통계 분석을 통해 중복성 검토에서 가장 중요한 요인은 '중복성 판단기준, 시스템의 데이터베이스 및 검색 알고리즘'으로 확인되었고, 3가지 요인에 대한 개선이 중복성 검토를 개선하는데 가장 중요함을 확인하였다. 또한 다중회귀분석을 통해 주요 요인들이 중복성 검토결과의 정확성에 미치는 영향성을 분석하여 요인들의 유의성에 대해 확인하였다. 본 연구를 통해 예비타당성 조사 시 R&D 중복성에 대한 검토가 향후 어떤 방향으로 개선되어야하는지에 대해 시사점이 제시된다.

• IE interfaces
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.111-121
• /
• 1995

본 논문에서는 효율적인 CIM 구축을 위해 필요로 하는 표준항목과, 이에 관련된 국제표준동향, 국내의 표준화 여건에 대해 요약하고, 설문조사를 통한 국내전문가 의견 수렴결과를 취합하였다. 설문의 조사내용은 CIM이 아직 보편화도지 않은 상항을 고려하여 FA기기 및 요소기술을 중심으로 작성하였으나, 설문결과의 분석은 시스템통합이란 관점에서 분석하여 국가적으로 시급히 추진해야 할 표준항목을 도출하였으며, 국내 여건을 고려한 표준화 추진방안을 고찰하였다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.34 no.6
• /
• pp.549-558
• /
• 2014

Integrated concepts that are broad enough to embrace facts, principles, laws, and concepts of multiple disciplines could become the core of integrated education. Integrated concept-centered education enables effective and practical learning. In this study, the Delphi Method was implemented targeting experts in science (physics, life science, chemistry, and earth science) and humanities (history, geology, economics, ethics, and politics) to find out the integrated concept that can be used to design the concept-centered integrated education in the Republic of Korea. 124 experts participated in this survey. Delphi survey was conducted for three rounds. In the first round, an open questionnaire was given to experts to collect feasible integrated concepts in each major field. Then, in the second round experts were asked to select integrated concepts that could be used practically in the field of their major. In the third round, the integrated concept with selection frequency over medium value were given. They were asked to evaluate the applicability of integrated concepts by using the Likert-scale questionnaire. Through this process, content validity was analyzed. As a result, five integrated concepts (change, interaction, space-time, energy, and equilibrium) were selected for the inter-science integration. And thirteen integrated concepts (conflict, community, relationship, structure, power, diversity, culture, change, society, interaction, freedom, justice, and equality) were chosen for the inter-humanities integration. Finally, for the science-humanities integration, seven integrated concepts (structure, diversity, change, interaction, cycle, system, and environment) were determined.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.37 no.4
• /
• pp.103-126
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is described in detail as follows. First, I would like to define what digital transformation is in the maritime transport sector. Second, it is intended to derive success factors for digital transformation in the maritime transportation field by examining various preceding studies related to digital transformation. Finally, in order to derive priorities for the derived success factors, an AHP analysis model is built and an expert survey is conducted for practical experts in the maritime transportation field. Based on the survey results, we would like to provide guidelines on what factors should be considered first among the success factors of digital transformation in the maritime transportation sector. In this study, in order to derive the priority of success factors for digital transformation in the maritime transportation field, the hierarchical structure was divided into four high-level evaluation items(strategic factors, organizational culture and human factors, technology factors, and environmental factors) and 21 sub-evaluation items. A relative evaluation method of weighting items among AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) was applied. AHP analysis of 24 questionnaires with a consistency ratio of 0.1 or less in order to increase the accuracy of information among questionnaires collected through maritime transportation related university professors, research groups, shipping companies, container terminals, and experts engaged in shipping related IT companies was carried out. As a result of the analysis, the priority of the first-tier factors for the success factors of digital transformation in the maritime transport sector was shown in the order of strategic factors, organizational culture and human factors, technology factors, and environmental factors. In addition, when looking at the priorities of 21 detailed items, it was found that the development of new business models, the creation of an active future digital strategy, and the leadership of the chief digital officer were high.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.46 no.5
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to identify differences of perceptions for gardens and parks between experts and the general public concerning several aspects including scope, scale, publicity, artistic and scientific nature, main materials, practicality and aesthetics, executive and management systems as well as legal understanding of garden and park. The properties of garden and park were derived through literature research, and the concept, similarity, and difference of gardens and the parks were recognized by the experts and the public viewpoint was clarified by questionnaire. As for the difference in the scope of the gardens and the parks, the expert group recognized it more widely than the general public. In general, the space recognized as a garden was the rooftop green space, and urban forests were recognized as a park. In addition, the general public recognized urban forests as gardens the same as they recognized parks, and the distinction was unclear. In the expert group, the perception that gardens were small and the parks were large was more prevalent. It was generally recognized that gardens were private spaces and the parks were public spaces. In the expert group, the gardens were more personal and the parks were more apparent to the public. In the general population, functional and scientific aspects rather than artistic creativity in both gardens and parks. In addition, both the general public and experts found that parks are more complex than gardens. The garden was centered on plant material, and the park was recognized as a center where the sculptural facilities were centered, or the plant material and the sculptural facilities were properly balanced. To the experts the view of the gardens was positive. Expert groups emphasized the aesthetics of the garden, and the parks were more practical, and the general population showed similar perceptions of utility and aesthetics when comparing gardens and parks. In addition, the utility of gardens in the general publics is more emphasized than the aesthetics of the park. Regarding the executive system the park was recognized as the public sector, and the difference was larger in the expert group. As for the management system, both experts and the general public perceive the management of the park or the garden to be carried out by the supporting organization, and it is necessary to discuss the diversification of the management subject. It is found that there is a certain difference in recognition with the mixture of concepts, and there is still a big difference in legal system and perception.

• Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.331-342
• /
• 2020

Purpose: This study concerns the cost of safety management in order to prevent accidents and disabilities in the construction industry. The purpose of the Chapter is to draw up problems and improvement measures for these safety management costs. Method: A detailed questionnaire was developed for 20 construction safety managers for the research. This questionnaire was analyzed and implemented by the Expert Group Interview (FGI) analysis method. Results: In order to understand the safety management cost system, alternatives such as preparing a standard manual, implementing regular on-site training, and establishing a monitoring system for the safety management cost were derived. In addition, there is a need to ensure autonomy in the execution of flexible costs so that they can be deployed immediately in case of emergency to improve the 'efficiency and necessity of the safety negligence system'. And it was analyzed as items that should be improved due to excessive demand for documentation. Conclusion: Through this study, problems should be recognized for the improvement of the construction safety management cost system. And it will have to come up with policy-based and institutional-improvement measures for experts.

• Science of Emotion and Sensibility
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.187-198
• /
• 2007

To improve VMD technology and suggest the comprehensive evaluation method for VMD, this study investigated and compared two methods of VMD evaluations; expert evaluation and questionnaire to consumers. We analyzed VMD factors of 4 stores with the same brand according to purchasing psychological steps of consumers at the purchasing point. The results are following: Customer Attraction and Purchase Stimulus by VMD showed higher scores in road shop than in department stores, while Put-on Imagination and Comparison Process by VMD showed higher scores in department stores than road shop. Visual Satisfaction and Shop Visit Satisfaction increased the purchasing desire of consumers. High-scored VMD shop evaluated by expert had high score in product purchasing intention of consumers. We found out that questionnaire method to consumers or their response is needed for evaluate VMD of shop in terms of analyze possibility of the related to their purchasing intention.

• Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science
• /
• v.103 no.2
• /
• pp.258-263
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to provide basic data for forest roads management by using AHP methodology to group the grade of disaster risk. In addition to this, a field study was performed at 114 targeted points on forest roads where there are high risks of disaster occurrence. The results of the field survey and the analysis of AHP were compared to provide the degree of disaster risks. It shows that the drainage facilities occupied the highest weighted value. Meanwhile, based on AHP analysis data, evaluation chart was created by providing evaluation criteria and evaluation score to each evaluation items. As a result of applying the evaluation chart to the field survey data, the highest score was 78.8 and the lowest score was 42.7 with the mean score of 61.8. Finally, through the experts' consultation based on calculated scores, this study proposed four different groups of disaster risk on forest roads.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.476-509
• /
• 2008

This research investigates the determinant factors of technology licensing contracts and the relative importance of each factor. To accomplish this objective we classify various factors affecting technology licenses into two categories, technology and environment, and conduct an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with a Korean expert survey. From the AHP results, we find that the possibility of commercial success, as well as the scope and levels of exclusive rights which are transferred together with technology to the licensee, are very important among technological factors in technology transfer. Moreover, we conclude that the technology utilization capacity and the learning capabilities of the licensee are also important environmental factors. Finally, we conclude that the factors which the licensor and licensee consider in technology transfer are different from each other. Based on this result, we discuss implications with regard to reducing this factor gap between the licensor and licensee as a means of promoting and improving technology transfer in the Republic of Korea.