• International Journal of Highway Engineering
• /
• v.8 no.4 s.30
• /
• pp.145-157
• /
• 2006

Generally, the method of the policy analysis has been used for making a policy decision of the development project of the road through the expert interview based on AHP. According to introducing PI, the study of the method of the integrating process for various opinion of the related groups is required. On this study I evaluate what is a difference between the results of integrated process and the AHP analysis on what is major considering factor in decision-making process. From the analysis, each evaluate factor is in level of significance by ANOVA. First, there is a significance level difference between Group A, C and Group B Second, there is also a significance level difference on the result of AHP analysis for each group in order to evaluate by integrated method. Finally, the method of AHP analysis which considers priority factor is expected as to be useful tool on decision-making of various group.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.7-11
• /
• 2013

Taking experts' knowledge to recommend items has shown some promising results in recommender system research. In order to improve the performance of the existing recommendation algorithms, previous researches on expert-based recommender systems have exploited the knowledge of a common expert group for all users. In this paper, we study a problem of identifying personalized experts within a user group, assuming each user needs different kinds and levels of expert help. To demonstrate this idea, we present a framework for using Support Vector Machine (SVM) to find varying expert groups for users; it is shown in an experiment that the proposed SVM approach can identify personalized experts, and that the person-alized expert-based collaborative filtering (CF) can yield better results than k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm.

• Geotechnical Engineering
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.8-13
• /
• 2019

• Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.66-75
• /
• 2001

A survey was conducted to investigate consumers'attitudes toward the foods developed by gene recombination techniques from December, 1999 to April, 2000. The questionnaires were mailed to 1,500 people, and the 1,101 people responded. The consumers were asked about knowledge, acceptance, intention of purchasing, and labeling information. Although the portion of the consumers (88.8%) knowing the genetically modified floods (GMF) was lower than that of the flood expert group (98.7%), many consumers had some knowledge on the GMF, which may be influenced by news released from mass media. Seventy-nine percent of the consumers responded that gene recombination technology is necessary in food production, which is similar to the findings on the survey of the expert group. The portion of the consumers responding that these foods are potentially hazard was 88.1%, which is a little higher than the data (80.9%) from the expert group. The consumers having greater knowledge less worried about a potential hazard of the gene recombinant foods (p<0.01). Although 62.9% of the consumers responded to be willing to purchase those foods, only 16.2% of them responded to purchase the foods with no conditions, which is lower to that from the expert group (23.5%). There was no statistically significant relationship between the knowledge and the intention of purchasing. The ninety point three percent of the consumers wanted the information on gene recombination to be labeled on the foods. The data from this survey suggest that knowledge of the consumers on the GMF are not accurate, so proper strategy for consumer education may need to be developed. In addition, it is necessary to improve safety assessment system and analytical techniques for genetically modified foods (GMF) and to build pre- and post-market surveillance system fur efficient implementation of the GMF labeling.

• Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.109-119
• /
• 2000

In this paper, we design and implement educational system by using active database technique in www environments. The developed system consists of three modules such as user group interface, active-based monitor, and expert group interface. The roles of each module are summarized as follows. The user group interface provides with system accessibility the users who registered in the developed system. The active-based monitor, triggering modules, consists of three sub-modules such as keyword parser, exception handler, and DB access module. Also it manages five items such as keyword index, Q&A DB, user group mailing list, and expert group mailing list. The expect group interface provides answer filling form for the expert who registered in the developed system.

• 소프트웨어공모대전
• /
• s.2
• /
• pp.81-88
• /
• 1997

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.46 no.5
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to identify differences of perceptions for gardens and parks between experts and the general public concerning several aspects including scope, scale, publicity, artistic and scientific nature, main materials, practicality and aesthetics, executive and management systems as well as legal understanding of garden and park. The properties of garden and park were derived through literature research, and the concept, similarity, and difference of gardens and the parks were recognized by the experts and the public viewpoint was clarified by questionnaire. As for the difference in the scope of the gardens and the parks, the expert group recognized it more widely than the general public. In general, the space recognized as a garden was the rooftop green space, and urban forests were recognized as a park. In addition, the general public recognized urban forests as gardens the same as they recognized parks, and the distinction was unclear. In the expert group, the perception that gardens were small and the parks were large was more prevalent. It was generally recognized that gardens were private spaces and the parks were public spaces. In the expert group, the gardens were more personal and the parks were more apparent to the public. In the general population, functional and scientific aspects rather than artistic creativity in both gardens and parks. In addition, both the general public and experts found that parks are more complex than gardens. The garden was centered on plant material, and the park was recognized as a center where the sculptural facilities were centered, or the plant material and the sculptural facilities were properly balanced. To the experts the view of the gardens was positive. Expert groups emphasized the aesthetics of the garden, and the parks were more practical, and the general population showed similar perceptions of utility and aesthetics when comparing gardens and parks. In addition, the utility of gardens in the general publics is more emphasized than the aesthetics of the park. Regarding the executive system the park was recognized as the public sector, and the difference was larger in the expert group. As for the management system, both experts and the general public perceive the management of the park or the garden to be carried out by the supporting organization, and it is necessary to discuss the diversification of the management subject. It is found that there is a certain difference in recognition with the mixture of concepts, and there is still a big difference in legal system and perception.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2007.05a
• /
• pp.617-621
• /
• 2007

최근 관심을 받고 있는 지속가능한 하천관리는 과거에 이루어졌던 이수 및 치수중심의 하천관리와 90년대 고조된 자연형 하천관리에서 진일보된 하천관리로써, 전체적인 하천시스템을 고려하여 자연과 인간이 함께 하천을 공유할 수 있도록 하기 위한 것이다. 환경유량은 이를 위한 필수적인 요소이며 하천 시스템에 절대적인 영향을 미치게 된다. 따라서 환경유량 산정시에는 하천의 특정 분야만 고려했던 과거와는 달리, 이 치수, 어류, 식생, 저서생물 등 하천의 전체시스템을 고려하여야 한다. 이를 위해 대상 지역의 전체적인 개황을 조사하고 환경유량 산정시 우선적으로 고려되어야 하는 영향인자를 결정하게 되는데 이때 각 분야의 전문가적 견해가 요구되어진다. 하천에 대한 전체적인 시스템 분석은 매우 다양한 방법으로 수행 될 수 있는데 하천의 유황변화, 하도의 변화, 하천을 중심으로 하는 수생 동식물의 변화, 하천에 설치된 수공구조물의 변화 등 여러 분야에 걸쳐 다양한 자료의 수집과 연계분석이 이루어져야 한다. 하천 생태계를 구성하는 가장 기본적인 환경유량의 파악은 이러한 다양한 분야의 연계 분석을 통해 이루어지며, 하천특성에 맞는 적절한 환경유량은 손상된 하천 생태계를 회복하는 근간이 될 수 있다. 환경유량의 영향인자를 결정하기 위해 현장답사를 통한 조사 분석이 수행되는데, 지금까지는 특정분야의 특정 전문가가 현장답사를 실시하고 특정 전문가의 견해에서 결과분석이 이루어져 왔다. 그러나 최근 선진국에서는 다학제간 전문가 그룹(Multi-disciplinary Expert Team, MET)을 통해 하천의 전체 생태시스템을 고려하여 환경유량을 산정하고 이를 유지할 수 있는 방안을 마련하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 금강유역의 환경유량을 산정하기 위하여 다학제간 전문가그룹의 접근방법을 구축하고 하천, 수질, 식생, 어류, 저서생물 등 각 분야별로 국내외의 전문가가 참여하는 MET를 구성하였다. 환경유량 산정을 위한 금강유역의 현장답사에 있어 MET의 기능과 역할을 분석하였으며 현장답사를 통해 금강유역의 전반적인 하천환경을 조사 분석하고 상호간 의견 교환을 통해 도출한 답사결과를 환경유량 산정에 적용하는데 있어 구성된 MET의 기능 및 역할을 현장답사 내용을 중심으로 분석하였다.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.247-254
• /
• 2009

This is a first and basic study for making Busan port more attractive. The study is intended to clear up the situation and problems of landscape of Busan port area from the viewpoint of landscape experts, citizen and visitors. To reach the goal an attitude comparative study has been conducted using a same questionnaire between landscape experts working in Busan city, Busan citizen and visitors to Busan port area. In questionnaire, firstly the situation of the whole landscape of Busan port area has been asked. The contents of questions on the situation of port landscape are satisfaction about port landscape, harmony between cityscape and portscape, images of portscape, effects of 25 portscape elements on portscape, problems of portscape, and ways of improving portscape. Secondly, each respondent has given answers freely on how to make Busan port area more attractive. As a result of this study there are several important differences of attitudes towards Busan portscape between experts, citizen and visitors. Especially there are some distinctive differences between attitudes of experts and citizen but the attitudes of citizen are similar to those of visitors. At the end of the study some proposals for making an improvement of Busan port landscape have been suggested on the basis of the results of this attitude comparative study.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.16-22
• /
• 2002

ASTAP Forum은 1998년 2월 아태지역의 표준화 활동 및 ITU, ISO등의 국제 표준화 기구에 회원국의 공동 입장을 반영하기 위해 설립된 APT 산하 표준화 기구이다. 여기에는 PKI 연동, VPN, 암호 알고리즘, ESM 로그, AP-CERT, 멀티캐스트, 정보보증등과 같은 정보보호 표준화 업무를 담당하는 정보보호 전문가 그룹이 있다. 본 기고문에서는 ASTAP Forum의 현황을 설명하고, 정보보호 전문가 그룹에서 현재가지 많은 논의가 이루어지고 있는 정보보호 항목에 대한 설명과 함께 여기에는 어떠한 이슈들이 있는지 알아보고자 한다.