• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.138-149
• /
• 2017

The objective of this study was to investigate and analyze the problems on 'System for Author's Property Right Limitation' in the North Korean Copyright Law. The NK Copyright Law had applied the international standards superficially, it may not be considered to get out of the grand frame of NK system. Especially, it is different that there is lack or short of contents on transfer, disposition, succession, trust, and so on for Author's Property Right. For example, free usages of Literary Works upon the NK law of Author's Property Right were described as 9 cases including copy and translation for personal purpose; copy in the library, etc. However, there are many insufficient items in view of international standards among the cases, showing omissions of critical terminology such as publications of literary works, purpose of usage, scope of usage, etc. Therefore, the NK law of Author's Property Right is interpreted not to be satisfied with the requirements for the law of Author's Property Right but to be legalized in terms of external announcement, and it seems not to be considered as the Author's Property Right Law with general standards enough to demonstrate the creativity freely.

• Digital Contents
• /
• no.10 s.65
• /
• pp.56-62
• /
• 1998

최근 미국에서는 Feist 판결 이후 데이터베이스의 보호에 대해 저작권법에만 의존하기에는 미흡하다는 인식이 확산되었다. 이에 저작물성이 인정되지 않는 데이터베이스에 대해 주법상의 부정이용을 주장하여 해결하려는 움직임이 판례에서 종종 보여지고 있는데, 아래에서 소개하려는 NBA사건도 이와 관련된 사건으로서, NBA 경기에서 점수 등의 정보를 허락없이 이용하는 행위가 부정이용에 해당하는가가 쟁점 사항이다.

• Digital Contents
• /
• no.2 s.117
• /
• pp.88-97
• /
• 2003

새로운 기술의 도입은 저작권 제도를 변화시키고 있다. 인쇄술의 발전에 따라 저작권의 보호에 대한 법제화가 이루어 졌고, 방송기술의 도입에 따라 방송권, 영화기술의 발전에 따라 영화에 대한 권리, 사진기술의 발전에 따른 사진에 대한 권리, 인터넷 등 정보통신 기술의 발전에 따라 전송권이 새로운 저작권자의 저작재산권의 한 유형으로 편입되고 있다. 이렇듯 저작권법은 기술의 발전에 따라 새로운 유형의 권리를 정책적 견지에서 수용하고 있으며, 앞으로도 예견되지 못한 기술의 출현에 따라 법의 개정은 이루어질 개연성이 크다.

• Cartoon and Animation Studies
• /
• s.29
• /
• pp.243-266
• /
• 2012

As contest exhibits have been activated, a variety of organizations are holding contest with various purposes. Analysis on the guidelines prepared by various sponsoring bodies ranging from public organizations to privately owned businesses shows that sponsoring bodies tend to possess copyrights of entries. Parts of guidelines of contest exhibit are the contract. While sponsoring body shows its opinion on copyright through guidelines, individual participant tends to consider it simply as a form to submit for contest exhibit rather than a contract. Now is the time to bring out a question in respect of the copyright on the contest exhibit. The important fact is that copyright on corporate contents is important, but copyright on individual contents is equally important and it must be protected and respected. This study aims to bring out a question on copyright by analyzing possession and infringement of copyright that stands forth in the guidelines of contest exhibit. Provisions on copyright of contest exhibit play a role as a contract. Provisions on copyright of contest exhibit shall be the ones which can be understood and accepted by both sponsoring body and winner who are the A and B of a contract. For this, change in perception of sponsoring bodies ranging from public organizations to privately owned businesses with prominent position is strongly required. For the foregoing, First, Indication of Copyright: Clear and concrete terms must be used. Second, Scope of Interpretation: Concrete and detailed indication must be made for preventing indication that allows comprehensive interpretation. Third, Cost for Author's Property Right: In case sponsoring body needs to possess or use the author's property right of prize-winning work, proper rights on use considering prize money corresponding to possession or use of author's property right must be indicated. Fourth, Term of Use: The term for using author's property right must be indicated. Fifth, Scope of Rights: The scope of author's property right that sponsoring body requires must be limited and indicated. Sixth, Mutual Respect: Items related to copyright must be indicated on the basis of the concept of bilateral contract founded on mutual consideration and respect, not on the concept of unilateral contract.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.31-47
• /
• 2001

From the viewpoint of Information Ethics. I tried to examine the moral justification of Intellectual Property Rights in the age of the digital information society. Lockian traditional argument of property rights which is based on the value of labor and Hegelian theory of personalization, both are not enough to justify the new Intellectual Property Rights. The notions of Intellectual Property Rights are to be changed. One change is from the absolute dominion over material property to the limited dominion over intellectual property. The change from property rights to process control rights is the other. To protect these intellectual property rights, there are three possible protection devices that we might take - legal protection, technical protection and moral protection. I argued that both legal and technical protection have some limitations, so the final way to protect the IP rights is to attempt to establish the moral protection as a fundamental solution.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.27 no.4
• /
• pp.20-34
• /
• 1996

This paper is described copyright management system for protection of the economic right to relate distribution of the digitised information. And the paper proposed the best method of copyright protection.

• Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.11-24
• /
• 2019

In this article, potential problems in the exchanges and collaboration of South and North Korean performance programs were reviewed focusing on the articles related to performances in the North Korean copyright law. In the North Korean copyright law, there were significant differences from the ordinary rules in the international society or lack of the rules. They are the problems on the bases and principles of North Korean copyright law, unacceptance of copyrightable works against their political system, equal and mutual benefit on the copyright of the South Korean copyrightable works, neighboring copyright and economic right, unlimited protection for moral right, unpreparedness of right protection for online copyrightable works, and so on. On the other hand, the available performance programs to exchange mutually between South and North in the short run include national operas, dramas, musicals, festival events, and so on. However, legal and systematic improvement plans are required on the different copyright rules between South and North to facilitate the exchanges and cooperation. Externally, collaborations are required in the international copyright stage such as collaborative agreements on various international copyright usages, and we should consider the global entrance of performance programs that contain national sentiment and develop mutual trusts through these.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.14 no.8
• /
• pp.137-144
• /
• 2009

On July 23th, 2009, the newly-revised copyright law was reflected the free trade agreement which occurred between the United States and the Republic of Korea. The agreement is expected to have positive effects such as competition as well as the social efficiency in the field of intellectual property. Nevertheless, Korean government should pay much costs, Therefore, we should minimize the cost in a short run and maximize the benefits we could obtain out of the agreement in a long run. However, we are not prepared to improve economic value of the intellectual property rights. Specifically, it should be noted that the aspects of law execution to protect not only the intellectual property rights. If we manage to get the utmost out of the agreement, we could be going through the transition from a consumer nation of intellectual properties to a producer nation.

• Digital Contents
• /
• no.12 s.103
• /
• pp.36-39
• /
• 2001

최근에 미국의 pro-patent 정책에서 볼수 있는 것 처럼 지적 재산권의 보호 대상을 확대하는 경향이 있다. 각국은 디지털관련 창작물의 보호와 관련하여 저작권법을 개정하거나 특별법을 재정하여 대처하고 있을 뿐만 아니라. 특허법의 경우는 기존의 법규정의 해석을 확장하는 방식으로 진행되고 있다. 특허권의 확대는 처음에는 소프트웨어에 대한 특허적격성 인정 여부에서 출발하였으나, 최근에는 소프트웨어를 통해 인터넷 구현되는 거의 모든분야 예컨대, 비즈니스 모델, 광고 방법, 체험, 금융 등에까지 확대되고 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2001.10a
• /
• pp.316-318
• /
• 2001

인터넷의 급속한 발전으로 인해 다양한 멀티미디어 리소스를 쉽고 빠르게 활용할 수 있는 시대가 도래하였다. 그러나 이러한 멀티미디어 문서들을 새롭게 편집하고 저장하고 유통시킬 수 있는 기술적 인프라는 아직 부족하다고 보여진다. 멀티미디어 문서를 편집하는 작업에는 다양만 문서포맷을 지원하는 멀티미디어 저작 툴이 필요하며 편집된 문서를 저장할 시에는 대용량의 고속 저장강치가 필요하다. 더불어 이러한 멀티미디어 문서를 활발히 유통시키기 위해서는 디지털 문서의 지적 재산권을 보호해줄 수 있는 견고한 유통 시스템이 필수이다. 본 논문에서는 멀터미디어 컨텐츠의 유통에 기여할 수 있는 지식서버 시스템에 관하여 기술하고자 한다. 가상문서[1] 개념을 기반으로 설계된 지식서버 시스템은 기존의 멀티미디어 컨텐츠를 재구성하여 만든 가상문서를 유통시킬 수 있는 특징을 가지고 있다. 이러한 지식서버 시스템을 이용하면 대용량의 저장장치를 필요로 하지 않는 멀티미디어 문서를 저작 및 저장할 수 있고, 새롭게 저작된 멀티미디어 문서를 지식서버 시스템의 인증 서버를 통하여 쉽게 유통시킬 수 있다. 또한 유통된 가상문서가 실제 문서로 재현될 경우에 지식서버 내의 로그관리기에 의하여 로그정보가 기록되기 때문에 컨텐츠 유통 현황을 실시간으로 파악할 수 있다.