• Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.109-115
• /
• 2011

Implants were placed after performing ridge expansion by inserting screws of gradually increasing thickness. Favorable clinical outcome was obtained. During surgery, buccal cortical plate fracture did not occur. Autogenous tooth bone graft material was grafted around the implant dehiscence defects and over the buccal cortical plate. The method involving the insertion of screws for ridge expansion is a successful and predictable technique for implant placement in narrow alveolar bone. Autogenous tooth bone graft material can be used for ridge augmentation and GBR.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.47 no.2
• /
• pp.240-246
• /
• 2009

Statement of problem: Insertion of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often complicated because of lack of supporting bone. Augmentation of the floor of the maxillary sinus with autogenous bone & bone substitute graft has been proven to be a reliable treatment modality, at least in the short term. The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors of implant survival rate associated with maxillary sinus lift with grafts. Material and methods: The sinus floor was augmented with bone grafts derived from modified Caldwell-luctechnique(71 subject, 93 sinus, 180 implants), the autogenous bone or autogenous+Bio-oss. Before implant installation the width and height of the alveolar crest were increased in the first stage procedure in 10 patients while in the other 61 patients augmentation and implant installation could be performed simultaneously width and height of the alveolar crest > 4 mm) or delayed installation. Results: In all case bone volume was sufficients for implant insertion. 14 of 180 inserted implants were lost during follow up and the healing period Patient received implant supported overdenture(5 patients) or fixed bridge(62 patients). Conclusion: Within the limit of the result of this study, we conclude that bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus floor with bone for the insertion of implants might be a reliable treatment modality and the autogenous bone graft and delayed installation method might be the factors for good results.

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.295-307
• /
• 2006

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the histological and biomechanical characteristics of self-tapping and self-drilling microscrew implants. Methods: 112 microscrew implants (56 self-drilling and 56 self-tapping) were placed into the tibia of 28 rabbits. The implants were loaded immediately with no force, light (100 gm), or heavy force (200 gm) with nickel-titanium coil springs. The animals were sacrificed at 3- and 5-weeks after placement and histologic and histomorphometric analysis were performed under a microscope. Results: All microscrew implants stayed firm throughout the experiment. There was no significant difference between self-drilling and self-tapping microscrew implants both in peak insertion and removal torques. Histologic examinations showed there were more defects in the self-tapping than the self-drilling microscrew implants, and newly formed immature bone was increased at the interface in the self-tapping 5-week group. There was proliferation of bone towards the outer surface of the implant and/or toward the marrow space in the self-drilling group. Histologically, self-drilling microscrew implants provided more bone contact initially but the two methods became similar at 5 weeks. Conclusion: These results indicate the two methods can be used for microscrew implant placement, but when using self-tapping microscrew implants, it seems better to use light force in the early stages.

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2001.11a
• /
• pp.71-71
• /
• 2001

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.30 no.3
• /
• pp.266-275
• /
• 2008

Dental endosseous implants require sufficient alveolar bone volume and quality for complete bone coverage and initial stability. But, atrophy or resorption of alveolar bone height and width according to patient's age and period of tooth loss can prevent ideal implant placement. Bone graft procedure has been proposed before or simultaneously with the placement of dental implants in patients with insufficient alveolar bone volume. While allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic bone grafts have been proposed and studied for alveolar ridge augmentation, the use of autogenous bone grafts represents the 'gold standard' for bone augmentation procedures. Conventional bone grafts are usually harvested from distant sites such as the ilium or ribs. Recently there is a growing use of intraoral bone grafts from intraoral donor sites such as mandibular symphysis, mandibular ramus and maxillary tuberosity. We recommend that the mandibular ramus is a safe autogenous bone graft donor site for bone harvesting with low morbidity. We report various effective autogenous bone graft procedures from mandibular ramus for the implant placement on various atrophic alveolar ridges.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.913-923
• /
• 2006

목적 : 최근 발치 후 즉시 임플란트 식립은 널리 사용되는 수술 방식이다. 이 연구의 목적은 임플란트 주위 골결손시 Ca-P으로 표면 처리된 이종골을 사용하여 골재생을 평가하기 위함이다. 재료와 방법 : 두 마리의 개 모델에서 하악 소구치와 제일 대구치를 발치하였다. 발치 6주 후 trephine bur를 이용하여 7.5 mm 지름과 5 mm 깊이를 가진 결손부를 형성하였다. 이 후 이 결손부의 중앙에 3.5 mm 지름과 15mm 길이의 fixture(GS II)를 식립하였다. 결과적으로 임플란트와 주변을 둘러싸고 있는 골 사이에는 2.0 mm정도의 gap이 만들어진다. 준비된 결손부 내로 자기골 또는 $Biocera^{(R)}$를 채웠다. 각각 4주, 8주 후 조직 절편을 제작하였다. 조직학적 평가를 위해 Block biopsy를 시행하였다. 결과 : 두 집단 모두 임상적으로 골이 완전히 채워졌다. 자가골이 이식된 부위(control)의 평균 골-임플란트 접촉(BIC)은 각각 4주째 $28.2{\pm}19%$였고, 8주째 $44.9{\pm}9%$였다. $Biocera^{(R)}$가 이식된 부위(test)의 평균 BIC는 각각 4주째 $34.6{\pm}27%$였고, 8주째 $27.6{\pm}23%$였다. 자가골이 이식된 부위(control)의 평균 골밀도는 각각 4주째 $32.7{\pm}25%$, 8주째 $37.4{\pm}17%$였다. 골-임플란트 접촉(BIC)과 골밀도의 평균 비율(%)은 비슷하였다. 조직학적으로 자가골과 이종골 이식 부위 모두 주변골과 잘 조화를 이루었고 유사한 치유 양상이 관찰되었다. 자가골과 이종골 이식 부위간 유의한 차이는 없었다.(P>0.05) 결론 : 임플란트 주위 2 mm의 골 결손부위에 자가골 또는 이종골로 채운 경우 유사한 결과를 얻었다. 이 결과 임플란트 fixture 주위의 골 결손부 해소를 위해 자가골을 대체할 수 있는 재료로 $Biocera^{(R)}$를 사용할 수 있음을 보여준다.

• Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
• /
• v.28 no.3
• /
• pp.277-290
• /
• 2012

Dental implants are universal restorative method on edentulous site in oral cavity and generally recognized by patients as well as clinicians. Rapid bone resorption of labial portion of maxillary anterior area is performed due to dental trauma, chronic periodontitis, and so on. Accordingly, Implants on maxillary anterior alveolar ridge with narrow labiopalatal width would lead to bony defects of dehiscence or fenestration. In this case, guided bone regeneration procedure is used to augment maxillary anterior alveolar ridge. It can have mechanical and biological advantages to mix tissue adhesive with bone graft materials in guided bone regeneration procedure. In these cases, when the dehiscence or fenestration defects was occurred by dental implants on maxillary anterior alveolar ridge with narrow labiopalatal width, guided bone regeneration procedures were performed with various combination of particle bone graft materials(allograft, xenograft, and alloplast) mixed with fibrin glue, excepting autogerous bone. We reported that all of 4 cases showed favorable alveolar ridge augmentations.

• Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
• /
• v.30 no.2
• /
• pp.184-191
• /
• 2014

In the mandibular posterior molar area, ridge deficiency is an unfortunate obstacle in the field of implant dentistry. Many techniques are available to rebuild the deficient ridge. Selection and necessity of these techniques are associated with significant morbidity and often require a second surgical site. With the advent of guided bone regeneration (GBR), one may now graft the deficient ridge with decreased morbidity and without a second surgical site. In this case, guided bone regeneration procedures were performed with a combination of allograft, xenograft, and alloplast, excepting autogerous bone at severe defected mandibular alveolar ridge and then placed to the implant successfully. We report that implant placement were good in two cases.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.31 no.3
• /
• pp.254-261
• /
• 2009

The maxillary sinus bone graft procedure is one of the predictable and successful treatments for the rehabilitation of atrophic and pneumatized edentulous posterior maxilla. Materials used for maxillary sinus floor augmentation include autogenous bone, allogenic bone, xenogenic bone and alloplastic materials. Among them, autogenous bone grafts still represents 'gold standard'for bone augmentation procedures. We selected the mandibular ramus area as a donor site for the autogenous bone graft because of low donor site morbidity. We performed maxillary sinus bone graft procedures with implant placement using particulated ramal autobone and bovine bone mixture, and got good results. This is a preliminary report of the maxillary sinus bone graft using particulated ramal autobone and bovine bone, requires more long-term follow up and further studies.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.10 no.8
• /
• pp.274-282
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to examine the types of implant, the type of bone graft, periodontal status and the distribution of implant among patients in a region. The subjects in this study were 299 patients who received implant treatment Busan area. The number of their implants was 871 in total. The findings of the study were as follows: As for the type of implant, home-made implants accounted for 83.6 percent, and imported ones represented 16.4 percent. Regarding bone graft, The presence or absence of disease made a significant difference to that($x^2$=14.66, p<.01). As to periodontal status by gender, age and disease, the periodontal state was better among those who were female(y=-2.73, p<.01), who were younger(F=14.20, p<.001) and who had no disease(t=-4.67, p<.001). The intergroup gaps were statistically significant. Concerning the distribution of implant, The distribution of implant was statistically significantly different($x^2$=33.14, p<.01). Age made a statistically significant difference to that($x^2$=74.09, p<.001). As to links between periodontal status and the number of implant, The intergroup gaps were statistically significant($x^2$=38.28, p<.01).