• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.56 no.1
• /
• pp.14-25
• /
• 2021

Several factors need to be considered for a successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, such as preoperative planning, operation technique, and postoperative rehabilitation. Graft choice, fixation, preparation method, maturation, incorporation to host bone, and graft tension should also be considered to achieve a good outcome after an ACL reconstruction. Factors to consider when selecting a graft are the graft strength, graft fixation, fixation site healing, and donor site morbidity, as well as the effects of initial strength, size, surface area, and origin of the graft on its potential for weakening during healing. There are two types of graft for an ACL reconstruction, autograft or allograft. Several autografts have been introduced, including the bone-patellar tendon-bone, hamstring tendon, and quadriceps tendon-bone. On the other hand, each has its advantages and disadvantages. The recent increased use of allografts for an ACL reconstruction is the lack of donor site morbidity, decreased surgical time, diminished postoperative pain, and good availability of source. Despite this, there are no reports suggesting that an allograft may have a better long-term outcome than an autograft. Allografts have inherent disadvantages, including a longer and less complete course of incorporation, remodeling, biomechanically inferiority to autograft, the potential risk of an immunogenic reaction and disease transmission. Higher long-term failure rates and poorer graft maturation scores were reported for allografts compared to autografts. An autograft in an ACL reconstruction should remain the gold standard, although the allograft is a reasonable alternative. If adequate length and diameter of autograft can be obtained for an ACL reconstruction, an autograft with adequate graft fixation and postoperative rehabilitation should be chosen instead of an allograft to achieve better results.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.38-44
• /
• 2007

Purpose: To evaluate status of reconstructed ACL and changes around graft through second-look arthroscopy after arthroscopic reconstruction of the ACL with autograft tendons. Material and Methods: Between Jun. 2003 and Feb. 2007, the second look arthroscopy was performed on 22 cases. Second-look arthroscopy was conducted on average 15.1 $(7\sim31)$ months after reconstruction. 15 cases received hamstring tendon autograft, 7 cases received bone-patellar tendonbone autograft. We measured graft tension using displacement by probing, synovial coverage by visual analysis at second-look arthroscopy The assay in Lysholm score, Lachmann test and KT-2000 arthrometer were evaluated status of reconstructed ACL. Results: The hamstring tendon group showed normal tension in 11 cases and lax tension in 4 cases. The patellar tendon group showed normal tension in 3 cases, lax tension in 2 cases and partial tear in 2 cases. In the hamstring tendon group, synovial coverage was good in 11 cases, half in 3 cases and pale in 1 case, and the bone-patellar tendon-bone group was good in 4 cases and half in 3 cases. The patellar tendon group was superior to the hamstring tendon group in Lysholm score (p<0.05), but insignificance difference in KT-2000 arthrometer results statistically. Conclusion: The hamstring tendon group was superior to the bone-patellar tendon-bone group in second-look arthroscopy after ACL reconstruction with autograft tendons results, but long term follow up will be necessary to further evaluated.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.88-91
• /
• 2010

전방십자인대 재건술시 자가건 선택에 대해서는 많은 논쟁의 소지가 존재하며 많은 보고들이 나오고 있으나, 현 시점에서 이식건으로써 자가 골-슬개건-골이 표준(gold standard)라는 주장은 이제 변화하고 있으며, 골-건 고정방법의 개선에 따른 조기 슬관절 안정성의 호전으로 자가 슬괵건의 사용이 점점 증가되고 있는 추세이다. 자가 골-슬개건-골은 이식건으로써 강한 물성, 튼튼한 고정, 장기 추시에서 높은 성공률 등으로 젊고, 강한 활동을 요하는 운동선수에서 종종 선택되고 있으며 조기에 강한 활동으로의 운동 복귀를 할 수 있다. 그러나 슬관절 전방 통증, 무릎을 꿇을 때의 통증, 슬개골골절, 슬개-대퇴 관절의 염발음 및 대퇴사두근력의 감소 등 이식물 채취로 인한 공여부 이환이 문제가 되었다. 그래서 자가 골-슬개건-골의 이식건으로서의 문제점 및 문헌상 고찰을 하여 논하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.9-16
• /
• 1999

Purpose : We have evaluated the outcome of the operative treatment of PCL rupture using the achilles tendon allograft. Materials and Methods : A retrospective study was completed for 30-PCL reconstruction cases, using the achilles tendon allograft from september 1996 to march 1998. There was an average follow up of 24 months, with range of 12 to 50 months. Results : The active range of motion was improved postoperatively. The Lysholm Knee Score was improved from a mean of 54 points preoperatively to 87 points postoerative 18 months. The "Cybex 340 isometric test" revealed satisfactory results compared with autograft. Conclusions : Use of allograft for recostruction of the PCL is an attractive option because it precludes the harvesting of autogenous tissue in a knee that is already at risk for patellofemoral and tibiofemoral osteoarthrosis.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.141-147
• /
• 2006

Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological results of anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft and tibialis tendon allograft. Materials and Methods: Twenty four ACL reconstructions using hamstring autograft and 30 using tibialis anterior tendon altograft were followed up at least 1 year. We performed femoral tunnel fixation with Ligament Anchor(LA) screw and tibial tunnel fixation with biodegradable interference screw. Evaluations included Lysholm knee(LK) score, Tegner activity scale, Lachman test, Pivot-Shift test, Quardriceps atrophy, incision site numbness, anterior knee pain and instrumented anterior laxity with $Telos^{(R)}$ device. Results: Preoperativ mean LK score was $60.3(18{\sim}82)$ in autograft group and 61.2(25-80) in allograft group. Mean LK score improved to $91.6(68{\sim}100)\;and\;92.6(77{\sim}100)$ respectively. Activity level, using Tegner activity scale, slightly decreased compared with that of Preinjury state in both groups. Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Quadriceps atrophy, anterior knee pain, incision site numbness, and anterior drawer test using $Telos^{(R)}$ device showed no significant difference between two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: In performing the ACL reconstruction, there was no statistically significant difference between hamstring autograft group and tibilis anterior allograft group in clinical or in radiological results.

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.55 no.4
• /
• pp.294-304
• /
• 2020

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a successful procedure independently by patient selection, timing of surgery, surgical technique, choice of graft, and fixation methods. Among these factors, graft selection and fixation methods might be the most critical yet controversial questions for surgeons. Although recent studies showed that grafts have advantages and drawbacks, there is still no ideal graft. Similarly, many fixation methods of femoral and tibial tunnels have been proposed over the last few decades, with no clear superiority of one technique over another. Surgeons should be familiar with a variety of grafts, fixation techniques, and their specific associated surgical procedures as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each. Therefore, this article summarizes the current literature and discusses the current state of graft selection and fixation methods in the treatment of an ACL injury.

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.56 no.1
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2021

Considerable progress on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery has been made over the past 20 years, and the results have improved significantly. An anatomical understanding of the anterior cruciate ligament has also changed, and the surgical technique has also changed accordingly. The double-bundle concept is still valid, but the ribbon-shaped anterior cruciate ligament concept, including direct fiber and indirect fiber, is gradually replacing it. The isometry point theory no longer exists, and various surgical methods, such as single-bundle anatomical reconstruction, double-bundle reconstruction, remnant preservation, and rectangular tunnel technique, are being performed. Regarding the graft, interest in the bone-patellar tendon-bone, patellar tendon, quadriceps tendon, and allogeneic tendon change over time, and this change is ongoing.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.98-102
• /
• 2004

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to make a report on the clinical prognosis of post traumatic lateral and posterolateral instability of the knee after LCL augmentation and popliteal tenodesis. Materials and Methods: The assessment was made among 21 cases who underwent augmentation of lateral collateral ligament(LCL) and popliteal tenodesis with allograft or artificial ligament (synthetic polyester, ABC ligament, Surgicraft, U.K.) at this Medical Center during the period from July 1996 to July 2003 and whose follow-up period was longer than one year. The authors recorded and analysed the physical findings (external rotation recurvatum test & posterolateral drawer test), stress roentgenograms(preoperative and postoperative) and Lysholm score. Results: The lateral and posterolateral instability of the knee were improved in 20 cases postoperatively, acccording to the clinical test and stress roentgenograms . Average Lysholm score was 52.5 preoperatively and 86.7 postoperatively .Conclusion: Our study found the surgery of lateral and posterolateral instability of the knee with augmentation of LCL and popliteal tenodesis using allograft or artiflcial ligament is simple technique. Taking these results into consideration, it seems to be one of effective methods of treatment.