• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.33-79
• /
• 2012

This paper first aims to reveal that, in the current trend of 'the participatory turn' in STS, there are divergent positions subtly different from each other, and that the understanding of these divergent positions can be significant to study the differences, similarities and interfaces between the various models of scientific governance discussed in STS and those in risk governance developed by risk studies. Secondly, this paper shows that theoretical differences among STS scholars on scientific governance and public participation goes back to the 1970s and 1980s, during which they first laid down the conceptual basis of STS. All ideas and theories have their own historicity. This article is about the 'historical epistemology' of the participatory turn of STS, and is to seek 'political epistemology' that can become a shared vision of STS.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.241-262
• /
• 2010

This study was carried out to identify the cognitive obstacles while using addition and subtraction with fractions, and to analyze the sources of cognitive obstacles. For this purpose, the following research questions were established : 1. What errors do elementary students make while performing the operations with fractions, and what cognitive obstacles do they have? 2. What sources cause the cognitive obstacles to occur? The results obtained in this study were as follows : First, the student's cognitive obstacles were classified as those operating with same denominators, different denominators, and both. Some common cognitive obstacles that occurred when operating with same denominators and with different denominators were: the students would use division instead of addition and subtraction to solve their problems, when adding fractions, the students would make a natural number as their answer, the students incorporated different solving methods when working with improper fractions, as well as, making errors when reducing fractions. Cognitive obstacles in operating with same denominators were: adding the natural number to the numerator, subtracting the small number from the big number without carrying over, and making errors when doing so. Cognitive obstacles while operating with different denominators were their understanding of how to work with the denominators and numerators, and they made errors when reducing fractions to common denominators. Second, the factors that affected these cognitive obstacles were classified as epistemological factors, psychological factors, and didactical factors. The epistemological factors that affected the cognitive obstacles when using addition and subtraction with fractions were focused on hasty generalizations, intuition, linguistic representation, portions. The psychological factors that affected the cognitive obstacles were focused on instrumental understanding, notion image, obsession with operation of natural numbers, and constraint satisfaction.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.81-95
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study wasto analyze the factors that enhance their learning achievement in a fieldtrip environment. For this academic goal, we analyzed a pattern of fieldtrip-related perception and attitudes of 19 science-talented students who participated in the 2007 KESO winter school. As for the perception type, the result of analysis showed that the science-talented students understood a fieldtrip as an experimental inquiry from an inquiry perspective, and that their understanding about a fieldtrip was based on anthropocentrism, positivism and instrumentalism from a science philosophy perspective. Regarding theattitudes type, the result revealed that the purpose of the winter school was mainly to learn knowledge in earth science, and that there was a significant tendency for the participating students to become a future scientist more eagerly than their parents expected. Students' fieldtrip-related academic self-concept was mostly positive while the participants experienced both positive and negative emotions.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.41 no.5
• /
• pp.520-530
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to investigate students' understanding of the terms presented on the information board in the Jinan-Muju National Geopark. To this end, a survey was conducted with 219 students (147 elementary, 41 middle, and 31 high school students) to determine the level of their perceptions of the geopark, and of the usefulness of the information board, and their understanding of the terms presented on the information boards of the National Geopark. To determine the students' understanding of terms, 10 representative information boards were selected and the entire content was converted into text. Afterwards, 256 key terms were extracted from the text through discussions with three experts, and these terms were presented to students to grasp their level of understanding. The results were as follows: First, the level of students' perceptions about the geopark was very low, so publicity and educational approaches are needed. Second, students were not interested in the information board and had a low level of understanding owing to the large amount of information and reading difficulties. Third, among the 256 terms, the number of terms that students found difficult to understand tended to decrease with increasing school grade: 80 for elementary school students, 53 for middle school students, and 31 for high school students. The reason the students had difficulty in understanding terms was that elementary school students had not yet learned the terms in the curriculum, whereas middle and high school students have difficulty understanding technical terms and Chinese characters. Therefore, the information board in the geopark will need to be easily translated into Chinese characters or additional explanations of technical terms need to be provided so that visitors can understand the concepts more easily.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.11
• /
• pp.25-33
• /
• 2015

In Korea, despite the increase in demand for Bigdata manpower, institutions and universities to educate and train Bigdata manpower are not yet much. Therefore, this study investigated the status regarding the recognition on Bigdata of universities students and presented a direction for educating Bigdata manpower at the university. In order to accomplish this purpose, this study surveyed and analyzed the students' understanding of Bigdata, the awareness of the students about the social impact of Bigdata, the learning intention of the students on Bigdata and presented Implications for Bigdata workforce development. As a result, despite of the somewhat difference in understanding for the Bigdata, it was found that their awareness about the impact of Bigdata is very positive. And this study showed the need of universities' and government' political effort for Bigdata workforce development, because it was investigated that students' intentions of learning for Bigdata is proportional to students' understanding levels and learning experience for Bigdata.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.36 no.6
• /
• pp.895-910
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to explore secondary students' progression in group norms and argumentation competency through collaborative reflection about small group argumentation. The progression is identified as the development of group norms and an epistemic understanding of argumentation with the enhancement of group argumentation competency during collaborative reflection and argumentation lessons. Participants were four first grade middle school students who have different academic achievements and learning approaches. They participated in ten argumentation lessons related to photosynthesis and in seven collaborative reflections. As a result, the students' group norms related to participation were developed, and the students' epistemic understanding of argumentation was enhanced. Furthermore, the students' group argumentation competencies, identified as argumentation product and argumentation process, were advanced. As the collaborative reflection and argumentation lessons progressed, statements related to rebuttal increased and different students suggested a range of evidence with which to justify their claims or to rebut others' arguments. These findings will give a better idea of how to present an apt application of argumentation to science teachers and science education researchers.

• Education of Primary School Mathematics
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.147-164
• /
• 2011

The national mathematics curriculum revised in 2007 emphasized students' mathematical communication and the curriculum is currently applied to all grades. In order to promote students' mathematical communication, the teacher needs to understand full implications and apply them to instruction. This study examined how teachers employed mathematical communication in their instruction and how they perceived it. The results showed that teachers had lack of understanding of student-centered instruction and mathematical communication. They also did not use various representation activities and discussion-based activities as expected. The number of students per classroom was reported by teachers as a main barrier to promote mathematical communication, but it did not make substantial differences in practice. Building on the results, this paper included implications for improving teachers' conception of mathematical communication.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.43 no.2
• /
• pp.99-110
• /
• 2023

In this study, in order to strengthen the AI utilization competency of pre-service secondary science teachers, a project activity in which pre-service teachers directly create an 'AI-based molecular structure customized learning support tool' by using Google's teachable machine was developed and applied. To this end, the program developed for 26 third-grade pre-service teachers enrolled in the Department of Chemistry Education at H University in Chungcheongbuk-do was applied for 14 sessions during extracurricular activities. Then, the perceptions of 'understanding how AI works', 'efficacy of using AI in science classes', and 'plans to utilize AI in science classes' were investigated. As a result of the study, it was found that the program developed in this study was effective in helping pre-service teachers understand the operating principle of AI technology for machine learning at a basic level and learning how to use it. In addition, the program developed in this study was found to be effective in increasing the efficacy of pre-service teachers for the use of AI in science classes. And it was also found that pre-service teachers recognized the aspect of using AI technology as a new teaching·learning strategy and tool that can help students understand science concepts. Accordingly, it was found that the program developed in this study had a positive impact on pre-service teachers' AI utilization competency reinforcement and perception improvement at the basic level. Implications of this were discussed.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2015.10a
• /
• pp.157-162
• /
• 2015

자동통역(Speech-to-speech translation)의 최우선 단계인 음성인식과정에서 발생한 오류문장은 대부분 비문법적 구조를 갖거나 의미를 이해할 수 없는 문장들이다. 이러한 문장으로 자동번역을 할 경우 심각한 통역오류가 발생하게 되어 이에 대한 개선이 반드시 필요한 상황이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 음성인식 오류문장이 정상적인 인식문장에 비해 비문법적이거나 무의미하다는 특징을 이용하여 DNN(Deep Neural Network) 기반 음성인식오류 판별기를 구현하였으며 84.20%의 오류문장 분류성능결과를 얻었다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2015.05a
• /
• pp.87-88
• /
• 2015

본 논문에서는 Q방법론을 중심으로 대학생들의 지역 기업브랜드 광고의 효용성 인식을 진단하고, 기능적인 측면에서 세부적인 효과요인들을 짚어보고자 하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 위에서 제기된 사항들의 해답을 얻기 위하여 주관성연구 분석방법을 활용하였다. 앞으로 계량적인 실증적 연구와 관련 이해당사자들간의 종합적 비교와 대안책이 추가된다면, 지역 기업브랜드 광고의 효용성 인식에 대한 개선과 활성화를 위한 정책방향에 보다 심도 있는 연구결과가 제시될 수 있을 것으로 예상된다.