• Title/Summary/Keyword: 인상재

Search Result 184, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Impression procedures for removable partial dentures (가철성 국소의치 제작을 위한 인상채득)

  • Heo, Yu-Ri;Son, Mee-Kyoung
    • Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.152-158
    • /
    • 2014
  • To fabricate removable partial denture which provide patient's comfort and maintain oral health, cast fabrication which reproduce anatomical and functional state of mouth is needed. Diagnostic cast and master cast are produced through the process of preliminary impression and final impression taking. Both of remaining teeth and edentulous area should be well taken in removable partial denture impression. According to the supporting type of partial denture, impression material and method can be changed. Therefore, understanding of impression procedure is essential for the accurate clinical application.

Clinical Application of Dynamic Impression Method Using Coe-Comfort$^{(R)}$ in Edentulous Patients (무치악 환자에서 Coe-comfort$^{(R)}$를 이용한 동적 인상 채득의 임상적 활용)

  • Keum, Eun-Cheol;Song, Young-Gyun;Lim, Jong-Hwa;Shin, Soo-Yeon
    • Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
    • /
    • v.27 no.1
    • /
    • pp.117-123
    • /
    • 2011
  • Impression taking procedure is very important for support, retention and stability of denture, and it affects the success of denture in completely edentulous patients. Various materials and methods have been used for impression taking in complete denture, while dynamic impression method is more physiological and functional method than the others. We had satisfying results with fabrication and relining of dentures after taking impression in the most physiological condition with recovery of deformed soft tissue by dynamic impression method using Coe-comfort$^{(R)}$ (GC America, IL, USA), tissue conditioner, in edentulous patients in this case report.

Functional impression technique using temporary denture for rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillary and mandibular ridges (심한 치조제 흡수를 보이는 무치악 환자에서 임시 의치를 사용한 기능 인상에 의한 총의치 수복 증례)

  • Suh, Young-Kyo;Bae, Jung-Yoon;Kim, Hyun-Hee
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.57 no.3
    • /
    • pp.238-244
    • /
    • 2019
  • Soft liner is used to functional impression technique when dental stone is immediately poured after taking impression because of viscoelasticity. In this case, a 78-year-old male visited for new dentures. Due to severe resorption of mandibular edentulous ridge, functional impression taking by closed mouth technique was planned. First of all, making maxillary and mandibular provisional dentures was done, and lined by soft liner to rehabilitate pressured maxillary and mandibular edentulous ridge. After this, Functional impression was taken by closed mouth technique using provisional dentures which are transformed to healed maxillary and mandibular edentulous ridge, and final denture were fabricated using maxillary provisional denture as a reference of artificial teeth arrangement. Consequently, restoring a complete edentulous patient with taking functional impression using provisional dentures resulted in recovering satisfying retention and function.

Comparison of mechanical properties and flowability of dental impression materials (치과용 인상재의 기계적 물성 및 흐름성 비교)

  • Kim, Ji-Yeob;Song, Kun-Ho;Lee, Kwang-Rae
    • Journal of Industrial Technology
    • /
    • v.36
    • /
    • pp.39-43
    • /
    • 2016
  • The purpose of this study is to determine and compare the mechanical and flow properties of polyvinylsiloxane impression pastes. Twelve polyvinylsiloxane impression materials were used. As mechanical properties, tensile strength and tear resistance were measured. Impression materials are subjected to tensile stresses when they are removed from the oral cavity and from stone models and tear resistance is the ability of the material to resist tearing under a tensile stress. Flow is dependent on the ability of the material to resist shear forces. Flow tests were performed to determine the handling characteristics and was measured using a shark fin testing device. An impression material must be able to penetrate the narrow subgingival sulcus and tight interproximal areas. Therefore, it must be able to resist the shear forces as it is pushed between tooth and gingival walls. It is necessary to understand the properties of interocclusal recording materials and is considered that the results obtained in this study will provide guideline information for the manufacturing of impression materials and for selecting appropriate impression materials.

  • PDF

Study on the Effect of Contact Angles of Elastic Rubber Impression Materials on the Surface of Working Cast (탄성 고무인상재의 접촉각이 작업모형 표면에 미치는 영향)

  • Kim, Joo-Won
    • Journal of dental hygiene science
    • /
    • v.10 no.3
    • /
    • pp.177-183
    • /
    • 2010
  • This study was begun to search effect of contact angles of elastic rubber impression materials on the surface of working cast. Of elastic rubber impression materials with a Type III consistency, such as polysulfide, polyether and addition silicone, we selected one and then measured the contact angle after dripping a distilled water 3.3ml. Then, after pouring a dental anhydrite in three types of impression materials, we prepared a working cast and then examined its surface. Contact angle was measured using a full automatic contact angle measuring system (DM-700, KYOWA, Japan), and the surface of working cast was observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-6700F, JEOL Ltd., JAPAN). The following results were obtained: 1) $Mean{\pm}SD$ (SD: standard deviation) of the initial contact angles were $91.3{\pm}20.5^{\circ}$ in the addition silicone materials, $90.0{\pm}2.2^{\circ}$ in the polyethers and $101.5{\pm}2.3^{\circ}$ in the polysulfides. These results indicate that mean values were similar but standard deviations of the three materials showed a great discrepancy. 2) As the time elapsed, addition silicone materials were found to have a contact angle decreased abruptly as compared with the remaining two types. That is, the initial contact angle was $91.3^{\circ}$ and it was abruptly decreased to $29.4^{\circ}$ after 25 seconds. 3) In the polyethers, the initial contact angle was $101.5^{\circ}$ and it was decreased to $90.7^{\circ}$ after 25 seconds. In the polysulfides, however, the initial contact angle was $90.0^{\circ}$ and it was $84.2^{\circ}$ after 25 seconds. This showed almost no changes in the initial contact angles. Moreover, its magnitude was greater than that seen in additional silicones. 4) There were significant differences in the contact angles between the three types of elastic rubber impression materials as the time elapsed (p<0.001). On an observation on the surface of working cast, addition silicone materials were found to have the most dense surface. This was followed by polysulfides and polyethers in a descending order.

Comparison of patient satisfaction with digital and conventional impression for prosthodontic treatment (보철 치료 시 디지털 및 전통적 인상채득에 대한 환자 만족도 비교 연구)

  • Yoon, Hyung-In;Lee, Su-Min;Park, Eun-Jin
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.54 no.4
    • /
    • pp.379-386
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose: The present study aims at researching the subjective satisfaction of patients who have experienced both conventional impression taking and digital impression taking to measure the possibility of wide clinical application of digital impression. Materials and methods: The study surveyed 170 adult patients over the age of 20, between October 2015 and April 2016, who voluntarily consented to participation and who experienced both conventional impression and digital impression at five dental hospitals that use intraoral digital impression. A total of 128 surveys were used for data analysis, involving frequency analysis, multiple response frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, and contingency table analysis, with the significance level set at 0.05. Results: Responses on the reason for taking impressions using the digital method appeared in the order of 'for implant treatment' (43.8%), 'for crown treatment' (30.5%), and 'for inlay treatment' (15.6%). Patients satisfaction was higher for digital impression taking than conventional impression taking (P<.05). As the preferred choice of impression, digital impression (60.2%) was higher than conventional impression (11.7%). Responses on the reason for choosing digital impression taking appeared in the order of 'no vomiting reflex' (35.1%), 'reliability of 3D digital scanning' (33.8%), and 'short time' (33.8%). Conclusion: The patients preferred digital impression taking to conventional impression taking in terms of satisfaction.