• Proceedings of the Korean System Dynamics Society
• /
• 2005.04a
• /
• pp.63-74
• /
• 2005

본 논문에서는 인과지도의 작성자와 독자 간의 심리적 격차에 관하여 분석하고자 한다. 먼저 기존에 연구되어 왔던 소산효과(dissipation effects)와 희석효과(dilution effects)는 인과지도를 작성하는 사람이 아니라 인과지도를 이해하는 사람에게 적용되는 심리적 경향이라는 점을 이 논문에서 지적한다. 소산 효과란 인과고리의 길이가 길어질수록 인과관계의 강도를 낮게 인식하는 심리적 경향을 의미한다. 희석효과는 여러 개의 인과관게가 존재할수록 특정 인과관계의 강도를 낮게 인식하는 심리적 경향을 의미한다. 이들 심리적 경향과는 달리 집중 효과(concentration effect)가 인과지도 작성자의 심리적 경향을 보다 잘 설명하는 것으로 실험 결과 분석되었다. 집중 효과란 주의를 집중하는 영역에 대하여 많은 인과관계를 생각하고, 인과관계의 강도 역시 강하게 생각하는 심리적 경향을 의미한다. 인과지도의 작성자 즉 시스템 컨설팅을 담당하는 사람들에게는 소산효과나 희석효과 보다 집중효과가 더 강하게 작용한다는 것이다. 이러한 심리적 비대칭성이 시스템 다이내믹스 연구자와 그의 고객 간의 의사소통 문제를 야기 시킨다는 점을 본 논문에서 지적한다.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.3
• /
• pp.5-26
• /
• 2000

확률적 인과론은 확률관계를 통해 인과 관계를 밝히려는 이론이다. 그런데 만약 단지 C가 E의 발생 확률을 높인다는 사실을 밝히는 것으로 그치지 않고 더하여 C가 E를 발생시키는데 얼마나 기여하는지 그 기여도도 밝힐 수 있다면 우리는 원인과 결과의 관계에 대하여 훨씬 더 많은 정보를 얻을 수 있게 될 것이다. 이 글에서 나는 빼기의 개념에 기반한 멜러나 엘스의 정량적 확률적 인과론들을 살펴본 후 그 이론들이 인과적 효과도나 인과적 연관도를 밝히는데 부적절한 이론들임을 보인다. 그 후 나는 인과적 효과도클 측정하는데 보다 적절한 공식을 제시하며 이 공식에 기반하여 인과적 연관도 또는 인과적 기여도의 공식도 제시한다.

• Science of Emotion and Sensibility
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.55-64
• /
• 2023

This research investigated category-based feature inference when category features were connected in common cause and common effect causal networks. Previous studies that tested feature inference in causal categories showed unique inference patterns depending on causal direction, number of related features, whether the to-be-inferred feature was cause or effect, etc. However, these prior studies primarily focused on inference pattens that arise from causal relations, and few studies directly explored how the effects of causal relations vary depending on causal strength. We tested feature inference in common cause (Expt. 1) and common effect (Expt. 2) causal categories when casual strengths were either strong or weak. To this end, we had participants learn causal categories where features were causally linked and then perform feature inference task. The results showed that causal strengths as well as causal relations had important impacts on feature inference. When causal strength was strong, inference for common cause feature became weaker but that for the common effect feature became stronger. Moreover, when causal strength was strong and common cause was present, inference for the effect features became stronger, whereas the results were reversed in common effect networks. In particular, in common effect networks, casual discounting was more evident with strong causal strength. These results consistently demonstrate that participants consider not only causal relations but also causal strength in feature inference of causal categories.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.83-133
• /
• 2015

In this paper, I pose a problem for Hitchcock's arguments for two concepts of effects that are intended to explicate double causal effects, and put forth a theory that is intended not just to meet the problem but also to accommodate Hitchcock's theory and Eells' theory both. First, I introduce an example of dual causal effects, and examine the accounts of Otte(1985) and Eells(1987) on how to explicate the dual effects. I show that their accounts of the dual effects help us understand the problem of dual effects and see how different it is for Cartwright(1979, 1989, 1995), Eells(1991, 1995), and Hitchcock(2001a) to meet the problem. Second, I introduce two concepts of effects on Hitchcock(2001a), that is, net effect and component effect that are allegedly analogous to two effects of structural equation model. Third, I reveal the significance of homogeneous subpopulation and causal interaction regarding the problem of dual effects while examining Cartwright's theory and Elles' theory. Fourth, I critically examine the two concepts of effects on Hitchcock and argue against Hitchcock's criticism of Eells' theory. Fifth, I take a moderator variable of structural equation model and a moderator effect into the probabilistic theory of causality, and formally generalize causal interaction due to the dual effects in terms of disjunctive relation and counterfactual conditionals. I expect my account of disjunctive relation and counterfactual conditionals to contribute not just to several problems the received theories of causal modelling confront but also to the structural equation models many people exploit as a promising statistical methodology.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.32 no.2
• /
• pp.173-185
• /
• 2019

Causal questions are prevalent in scientific research, for example, how effective a treatment was for preventing an infectious disease, how much a policy increased utility, or which advertisement would give the highest click rate for a given customer. Causal inference theory in statistics interprets those questions as inferring the effect of a given intervention (treatment or policy) in the data generating process. Causal inference has been used in medicine, public health, and economics; in addition, it has received recent attention as a tool for data-driven decision making processes. Many recent datasets are observational, rather than experimental, which makes the causal inference theory more complex. This review introduces key concepts and recent trends of statistical causal inference in observational studies. We first introduce the Neyman-Rubin's potential outcome framework to formularize from causal questions to average treatment effects as well as discuss popular methods to estimate treatment effects such as propensity score approaches and regression approaches. For recent trends, we briefly discuss (1) conditional (heterogeneous) treatment effects and machine learning-based approaches, (2) curse of dimensionality on the estimation of treatment effect and its remedies, and (3) Pearl's structural causal model to deal with more complex causal relationships and its connection to the Neyman-Rubin's potential outcome model.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.36 no.1
• /
• pp.63-83
• /
• 2023

Many existing studies have found significant correlations between green spaces, including urban parks, and children's happiness. Furthermore, it was implied that the area/proximity of the urban park would be effective in enhancing infancy happiness. However, inferring causal effects from observed data requires appropriate adjustment of confounding variables, and from this perspective, the causal relationship between the area of urban parks and children's happiness has not been well understood. The causal effect of urban parks on children's happiness was estimated in this study using data from the panel study on Korean children. As methods for adjusting confounding variables, regression adjustment using a regression method, weighting method, and matching method were used, and key concepts of each method were described before the analysis results. Confounders were chosen for the analysis using a directed acyclic graph. In contrast to previous research, the analysis found no significant causal relationship between the size of the city park and children's happiness.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.30 no.5
• /
• pp.615-632
• /
• 2017

Unlike randomized trial, statistical strategies for inferring the unbiased causal relationship are required in the observational studies. The matching with the propensity score is one of the most popular methods to control the confounders in order to evaluate the effect of the treatment on the outcome variable. Recently, new methods for the causal inference in latent class analysis (LCA) have been proposed to estimate the average causal effect (ACE) of the treatment on the latent discrete variable. They have focused on the application study for the real dataset to estimate the ACE in LCA. In practice, however, the true values of the ACE are not known, and it is difficult to evaluate the performance of the estimated the ACE. In this study, we propose a method to generate a synthetic data using the propensity score in the framework of LCA, where treatment and outcome variables are latent. We then propose a new method for estimating the ACE in LCA and evaluate its performance via simulation studies. Furthermore we present an empirical analysis based on data form the 'National Longitudinal Study of Adolescents Health,' where puberty as a latent treatment and substance use as a latent outcome variable.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.183-209
• /
• 2019

In this paper, I first examine Reiss'(2005) arguments for the causal instrumental variable. Second, I argue that the conditions for causal transitivity I consider meet what the causal instrumental variables and the interveners of the manipulation theory of causation are intended to hold. Reiss shows that two conditions for instrumental variables are not sufficient for causal significance of independent variables for dependent variables. Reiss articulates and reformulates the conditions for instrumental variables in terms of the conditions on causality, while naming his instrumental variables as causal instrumental variables. Reiss argues that the causal instrumental variables are similar to the interveners of the manipulation, or intervention theory of causation. He further argues that the causal instrumental variables do a better job the interveners do. I argue that the conditions for causal transitivity I consider meet the goal the conditions for the causal instrumental variables and the conditions for the interveners both are intended to achieve.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.21-67
• /
• 2017

In this paper, I critically examine Sartorio's (2006) argument for disjunctive cause, and put forth disjunctive causal structure in a different way. I show that the disjunctive causal structure meets not just what Sartorio means to claim but also our understanding of causal responsibility. First, I introduce Sartorio's argument for disjunctive cause. Second, I critically discuss Sartorio's responses to the criticisms of her arguments for disjunctive cause, and propose another problem with her arguments. Finally, I explicate in a different way Sartorio's disjunctive cause in terms of disjunctive causal structure founded on moderate variables, causal interaction, and probability trajectory. I notice, regarding the disjunctive causal structure, the role of causal interaction of cause events with moderate variables. I reveal, regarding the disjunctive causal structure, the significance of indetermination of cause events and effect events for our understanding of causal responsibility. I show that the disjunctive causal structure guides us more convincingly to assign causal responsibility to an agent. I come to three conclusions. First, there is no disjunctive cause event Sartorio argues for. Second, propensities of events to be causally connected to an effect event constitute disjunctive relation. Third, we should notice indetermination of cause events and effect events while assigning causal responsibility to an agent.

• Journal of Labour Economics
• /
• v.42 no.4
• /
• pp.59-88
• /
• 2019

This study estimates causal effects of the governor vacancy on the regional economy, exploiting the case of exogenous governor vacancy in Korea. We find that the governor vacancy has a negative impact on the regional economy by lowering the employment rate and reducing the amount of credit card expenditures. Negative effects are more pronounced among vulnerable groups of the labor market such as women and aged 20~29 and 50~59. In addition, negative effects vary by characteristics of the governor. Negative effects of the governor vacancy on the regional economy show empirical evidence suggesting that leaders do matter.