• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.49-65
• /
• 2000

The availability and use (citedness) of Korean medical journals are measured based on the bibliometric data of 82 journals evaluated by the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors between 1997 and 1999. A Korean medical journal is held on the average by one half of Korean medical libraries investigated. Only 10 journals (12.2%) are covered in any of 36 abstract and index databases in the field of medicine searchable through DIALOG. The journal self-citation rate is 3.402%. 1.092% of papers are cited at least once by SCI journal papers within 3 years after publication. The average SCI impact factor of Korean medical journals is 0.111, However, the impact factor of MEDLINE or SCISearch journals is 10 times higher. The results show that the Korean medical journals are not easily available domestically and internationally. They are hardly cited by Korean colleagues or by foreign scholars either.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.27-41
• /
• 2002

The study investigated the citation indicators and the citation analysis data developed in the KoMCI(Korean Medical Citation Index) project. With the full understanding of the current level of citation rates of Korean medical journals by Korean medical journals. and of the characteristics and problems associated with the KoMCI citation indicators, it is possible to further develop or modify citation indicators which will better represent the citation patterns of Korean medical journals. The highest impact factor reported in the KoMCI 2000 : Korean Medical Journal Citation Reports, which covered 69 Korean medical journals published in 2000 is 0.424 and the average is 0.182. It is because only 8.5% of references cited in Korean medical journal articles is to the Korean journal articles, The journal self-citation rates are very high (usually higher than 50%) due to the fact that there are only a few Korean journals published in the same subject area. The KoMCI impact factors of two Korean SCI journals for which SCI JCR reported the SCI 2000 impact factors are about 1/3 of the SCI impact factors. It is because SCI is based on the citations received from 5,900 journals whereas KoMCI is from 69 journals.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.273-278
• /
• 2002

본 연구는 $\boxDr$KoMCl (Korea Medical Citation Index) 2000 한국 의학학술지 인용정보$\boxUl$를 바탕으로 하여 한국 의학학술지에 의한 인용을 통하여 한국 의학학술지를 평가하는 대규모의 인용문헌 분석을 시도하였다. 2000년도에 발행된 69종의 한국 의학학술지를 대상으로 하여 이들의 인용도와 각종 인용분석지표의 특성을 고찰하고, 이러한 인용분석지표가 연구자의 업적평가 지표로 사용될 수 있는지의 여부에 대해 분석 하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.267-272
• /
• 2002

최근 국제학술지에 등재되는 한국 의학논문이 증가하는 이유가 SCI 또는 MEDLINE 학술지를 선호하는 연구업적 평가정책과 관련이 있는지에 대한 관심이 국내학계에 존재하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 1980년대에 이어 1990년대에도 SCI 학술지나 MEDLINE 학술지에 많은 논문을 발표한 의학분야 중의 하나인 방사선학분야를 중심으로, 한국 의학자들이 1990년대에 발표한 논문들의 증가추세, 국제학술지와 국내학술지 논문 분포현황을 분석하여, 우리나라 의학 학술논문의 국제화 동향과 그 특성을 고찰하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2015.08a
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 의학 분야를 중심으로 A 대학교 의과대학 도서관의 Science Direct 전자학술지 이용통계와 Scopus 인용지수를 비교분석하였다. 이에 594종의 의학 분야 전자학술지를 추출하여, 그 이용통계와 Scopus 인용지수에 대해 빈도분석, 상관관계분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 의학 분야 전자학술지의 이용이 소수의 학술지에 집중되어 있고, 그 이용통계와 인용지수 사이에 양의 상관관계가 성립함을 확인할 수 있었다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.85-104
• /
• 2001

The purpose of the study is to investigate the international standings of Korean medical journals and to provide a concrete journal evaluation data. The SciSearch database was searched for the 7,779 papers published in 8 Korean medical journals between 1989 and 1998. The frequency of citation to each journal was measured for each year, and the journal impact factor was calculated from 1991 to 1999 exactly as it is calculated in the Jour~~lnl Citation Reports (JCR). The Korean-language journals were rarely cited in SCI, even though the journals were of the medical areas where Korean researchers published a great deal of SCI papers. The number of citations to English-language journals started to grow from 1994 and increased rapidly from 1997. The citation interval is getting shorter, resulting in the drastic increases in the impact factors in the recent years. The nine-year averages of impact factors of the journals were distributed between 0.002 and 0.126. The international standings of Korean medical journals are very poor. When the impact factors were compared to those of SCI journals in the same subject category, Korean-language journals fell below the last SCI journals ranked by the impact factor, and the English-language journals were at the bottom among the SCI journals. The impact factors of 3 English-language Korean medical journals were about 2.0 when they became SCI journals in the late 1990s.

• 한국의학학술지인용정보
• /
• s.2002
• /
• pp.278-312
• /
• 2003

• 한국의학학술지인용정보
• /
• s.2006
• /
• pp.379-420
• /
• 2007

• 한국의학학술지인용정보
• /
• s.2005
• /
• pp.365-404
• /
• 2006

• 한국의학학술지인용정보
• /
• s.2000
• /
• pp.265-293
• /
• 2002