• Proceedings of the KOR-KST Conference
• /
• 1998.10b
• /
• pp.529-529
• /
• 1998

운송 서비스산업에 대한 지속적인 규제완화는 운송 기업의 진입 및 퇴출을 자유롭게 하였고, 외국 기업의 국내에서의 영업 활동이 가능하게 했을 뿐 아니라, 업종간 분류를 무의미하게 하여 운송기업은 전방위 경쟁을 피할 수 없게 되었다. 이러한 경쟁 환경하에서 운송 기업의 효율적인 운영은 국가 물류비 절감 측면에서, 그리고 해당 기업의 사활 측면에서 매우 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 소화물 일관 수송은 택배 또는 특송이라 불리우는 운송 서비스업의 일종으로, 화주 한명의 화물량이 차량 한 대 분량에 못 미치고, 고객이 원하는 출발지에서 목적지까지 운반해주는 특성을 가지고 있다. 소화물 일괄 수송은 지역을 순화하면서 화물을 접수하여 인근 터미널까지 운반하는 수집과정, 터미널과 터미널을 연결하는간선수송 과정, 터미널에서 최종 목적지까지 운반하는 배달과정을 거쳐 이루어진다. 본 연구를 통하여 터미널과 터미널을 연결하는 간선 수송과정에서 발생하는 비용을 줄이는 화물운송경로를 찾아주는 네트웍 최적화 모형이 개발되었으며, 이를 실제 업무에 적용하여 화물운송 경로를 조정함으로써 적재율 20%이상 개선, 운송비용 10%이상 절감이 가능함을 확인하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2002.05a
• /
• pp.185-192
• /
• 2002

최근의 새로운 정보기술이 발전됨에 따라 대다수 수거 및 배송관련업체들은 효과적인 차량운송계획에 대한 새로운 방법을 모색하고 있다. 본 연구는 주문배달 및 수거를 수행하는 택배시스템 내에서 효과적인 차량운송계획을 수행하기 위한 GIS시스템을 응용한 연구로서, 고객의 요구시간제약과 화물의수거 및 배달을 동시에 고려한 최적운송경로시스템을 개발하였다. 이를 위해 GeoDatabase를 기반으로 항 차량운송계획 프로그램을 개발하고, 이를 GIS시스템(ArcLogistics Route)에 적용하여 물류센터와 고객간의 차량운송계획 및 운송정보시스템을 구현하였으며, 부산지역의 수산물류운송계획에 적용하였다.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.123-141
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this paper is to suggest a plan on promoting use of multimodal transport logistics terms in Incoterms, 2010. This study deals with the terms of three promotion factors which are a user's subjective factors, a trade transport logistics environment factors, and a term content factors. According to analysis results of the factors, a user's subjective factors(3.87 score) are scored the most ones of promotion factors of using multimodal transport logistics terms in Incoterms, 2010, to be compared with a trade transport logistics environment factors(3.60 score). with a term content factors(3.74 score). Therefore, first of all, it is important to promoting use of multimodal transport logistics terms in Incoterms, 2010 through as follows, a user's subjective factors : (1) to understand correlation of door to door multimodal transport and terms of Incoterms, 2010, (2) to promote use of multimodal transport logistics terms in Incoterms, 2010 in door to door multimodal transport, (3) to restrain customary use of FOB, CFR, CIF terms. And, the next, we have to promote use of multimodal transport logistics terms in Incoterms, 2010 through considering a trade transport logistics environment factors and a term content factors.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartD
• /
• v.18D no.5
• /
• pp.371-384
• /
• 2011

This paper considers logistics decision support system which deals with transportation mode selection considering transportation and carbon emission cost. Transportation and carbon emission costs vary with the choice of transportation modes and to become competitive companies need to find proper transportation modes for their logistics services. However, due to the restricted capacity of transportation modes, it is difficult to balance transportation and carbon emission costs when designing logistics network including transportation mode choice for each service. Therefore this paper aims to analyze the trade-off relationship between transportation and carbon emission cost in mode selection of intermodal transportation and to provide optimal green logistics strategy. In this paper, the logistics decision support system is designed based on mixed integer programming model. To understand the trade-off relationship of transportation and carbon emission cost, the system is tested with various scenarios including transportation of containers between Seoul and Busan. The analysis results show that, even though sea transportation combined with trucking is competitive in carbon emission per unit distance travelled, the total cost of carbon emission and transportation for the sea transportation may not have competitive advantage over other transportation modes including rail and truck transportation modes. The sea-based intermodal logistics service may induce detours which have negative impacts on the overall carbon emission. The proposed logistics decision support system is expected to play key role in green logistics and supply chain management.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.17-28
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to analyze logistics cost of transportation systems on EC(electronic commerce) between company and consumer. Transportation system in logistics is classified by three types on EC. The first type is the direct delivery from supply factory to consumers(type I). The second type is the delivery through distribution center in each area by owner logistics company (type II). The third type is the commission of delivery to the third party logistics company(type III). The logistics of EC has various service characteristics such as dealing with small quantity, various goods, and high frequency. This study assumes that all day's order is delivered on a next day. The logistics cost function is calculated according to the number of orders, delivery distance, transport quantify. and allocated freight trucks for daily order of the subject zone. The logistics cost changes according to the daily order characteristics. Therefore it is simulated to analyze the logistics cost change that considers the type of transportation's order characteristics. As a result of analysis, if the number of order is less than 10 and the quantify of each order is less than 10kg, type III has an advantage over the others And if the number of order is more than 10 and the quantity of each order is more than 10kg, type I has an advantage in the same zone and type II has an advantage in the other zones. This study is limited on the actual application because this study doesn't consider logistics infra of supply company and transport service time. If further study that considers these factors is implemented, it can estimate more accurate logistics cost on EC and propose an efficient freight transport alternatives to the company. This study attributes to estimate the logistics cost change over the frequency of daily order, the quantify of supply goods, and the transport distance on EC.

• 복합운송
• /
• s.142
• /
• pp.12-15
• /
• 2004

• 복합운송
• /
• s.144
• /
• pp.12-15
• /
• 2004

• 복합운송
• /
• s.135
• /
• pp.20-22
• /
• 2002

무역항의 항만시설 사용 및 사용료 - 일본의 국제복합운송화물 취급실적

• 복합운송
• /
• s.125
• /
• pp.32-33
• /
• 1999

• 복합운송
• /
• s.141
• /
• pp.12-13
• /
• 2003