• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2009.05a
• /
• pp.1380-1383
• /
• 2009

수질오염총량관리제도(TMDL)는 유역의 수질 회복 및 관리를 위해 우리나라를 비롯해 미국의 여러 주에서 수립되어 적용되고 있다. 현재 미국에서는 유역 관리를 위한 TMDL의 기준설정에 있어 오염부하지속곡선(LDC)의 활용이 급격히 증가되고 있다. 그러나 기존의 LDC 방법은 사용자로 하여금 충분한 교육이 필요하고 LDC 생성을 위한 데이터 구축이 수동적으로 이루어지고 있다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 최근 Web GIS 기반의 LDC 시스템이 개발되어 활용되고 있다. 웹기반의 LDC 시스템은 미국 지질 조사국(USGS)이나 한국 환경부(MOE) 서버 등을 통해 구축된 자료를 이용하여 오염부하지속곡선을 생성하기까지의 모든 과정이 자동으로 처리되어 기존 수작업에 의한 방법의 단점을 보완하고 있다. 그리하여 본 연구에서는 우리나라 수질오염 총량 관리제도 단위유역인 낙본A와 금본C, 그리고 미국 인디애나 주의 Yellow River와 펜실베이니아 주의 Borkenstraw Creek 유역을 대상으로 웹기반 LDC 시스템을 이용하여 유역의 특성을 분석하였다. 본 연구에서 사용된 유량 및 수질 자료는 본 시스템에서 연계된 환경부 서버와 USGS 서버를 통해 구축하였다. 분석 결과 낙본 A 단위유역의 BOD 오염부하량과 농도가 대체적으로 목표수질 기준을 만족하는 것으로 나타났으나 전반적으로 유량이 적을 때 다소 목표수질을 초과하고 있는 나타나, 적합한 수질관리 대책이 필요한 것으로 분석되었다. 금본 C 단위유역의 경우 대부분 BOD 배출부하량이 할당 부하량보다 낮게 나타나는 것을 알 수 있고, 목표수질 농도에 비해 배출되는 BOD 농도 또한 대체적으로 낮은 것을 알 수 있다. 또한 Yellow River 유역의 경우는 유량이 많을 때 배출되는 수질농도가 목표수질을 초과하는 것으로 보아 강우시 배출되는 오염물에 대한 대책이 요구되고, Borkenstraw Creek 유역의 경우 유량이 적을 때를 제외하고 대부분 구간에서 배출부하량이 할당부하량을 초과하여 이에 대한 적합한 수질관리가 필요할 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구의 결과에서 나타난 바와 같이 웹기반 LDC 시스템을 통해 수질오염총량관리제도 단위유역에 대한 수질 평가 및 특성 분석이 용이하며 수질 회복을 위한 근본적인 해결방법을 제시할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.166-166
• /
• 2017

현재 우리나라에서 많은 연구에 활용되고 있는 오염부하지속곡선(Load duration curve, LDC)은 단일 기준유량의 문제점을 개선하기 위해 전체 유량 범위를 고려한 수질오염총량관리제(Total Maximum Daily Loads, TMDL) 평가 기법으로 개발되었다(Choi et al., 2012). LDC를 이용해 목표수질 달성여부를 분석하기 위해서는 일유량자료를 바탕으로 유량지속곡선(Flow Duration Curve, FDC)의 작성이 선행되어야 하는데(Park and Oh, 2012), 365일 연속적으로 측정된 실측 자료를 이용하는 것이 가장 확실하고 정확한 방법이다. 그러나 현재 환경부에서는 총량관리 단위유역에서 8일 간격으로 실측 유량 및 수질 측정이 이루어지고 있고, 특히 주로 비강우 시에 측정이 이루어지고 있는 실정이기 때문에 고유량에 대한 모니터링 자료가 부족한 실정이다. 이 같은 이유로 많은 연구에서 불연속적인 평균 8일 간격 유량을 그대로 사용하거나 일유량자료를 확보하기 위해 다양한 방법을 이용하고 있다. 그러나 이러한 유량자료의 변동은 유랑지속곡선에 변화를 주고 결과적으로는 LDC를 이용한 목표수질 달성여부를 판단함에 있어 불확실성이 있다. 이에 본 연구의 목적은 환경부 총량측정망 8일유량자료와 이와 연계성이 있는 국토교통부 하천유량 측정망 일유량자료를 이용하여 각각의 LDC를 작성하고, 이러한 일유량과 8일유량 사용이 LDC를 이용하여 목표수질에 대한 오염부하 특성분석에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 유량 조건별로 차이를 비교분석하는 데 있다.

• Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.35-48
• /
• 2019

Long term flow measurement and water quality analysis data need to determine the target and allowable load for each basin in Total Water Pollution Load Management System (TWPLMS). The Load Duration Curve (LDC) is analyzed the relationship between flow data and water quality, and evaluates the pollutant load characterization by flow conditions. LDC of Kyeongancheon is created by the Flow Duration Curve (FDC) that was analyzed 8-day interval measured flow data from 2006 to 2015 and numeric water quality target in Kyeongancheon. As a result of this study, it is necessary to manage the point source pollutant because the numeric water quality target is not satisfied in the low flows. Also the numeric water quality target has been exceed for four months from March to June of the year and continuous and systematic watershed management is required to satisfy the numeric water quality target.

• Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater
• /
• v.27 no.4
• /
• pp.429-438
• /
• 2013

This study was to develop effective water quality management measures using LDC (Load Duration Curve) curves for TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Loads) unit watershed. Using LDC curves, major factors for BOD and T-P concentration loads generation (i.e. point source or non-point source) in the case study area (Geumho river basin) were found for different hydrologic conditions. Different measures to deal with the pollutant loads were suggested to establish BMPs (Best Management Practices). It was found that the target area has urgent T-P management methods especially at moist and midrange hydrologic conditions because of point source pollutants occurred in developed areas. One example measure for this could be establishment of advanced treatment facility. This study proved that the use of LDC was a useful way to achieve TWQ (Target Water Quality) on the target watershed considered. It was also expected that the methodology applied in this study could have a wider application on the establishment of watershed water management measures.

• Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment
• /
• v.28 no.5
• /
• pp.693-703
• /
• 2012

Load Duration Curve(LDC) is a useful tool for analyzing water quality characteristics under various stream flow conditions. This study investigated the methods to identify impaired waterbodies in the assessment of water quality goal attainment by using LDC for the management of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Three methods were proposed. Non-typical regime exclusion method is a method to exclude water quality observations in the non-typical extreme flow conditions in order to minimize the influence of non-ordinary water quality. Flow regime weighted average method is a method to calculate weighted mean water quality instead of arithmetic mean in order to consider water characteristics properly on stream flow regime in addition to the effect of Non-typical regime exclusion method. Load exceeded interval comparison method is a method to compare the intervals between the attained and non-attained load duration periods on the LDC. The assessment of water quality goal attainment can be performed more reasonably and precisely considering water quality variations on stream flow conditions by applying these proposed methods.

• Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater
• /
• v.29 no.5
• /
• pp.551-557
• /
• 2015

The TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) has been used to determine the water quality target. LDC (Load Duration Curve) based on hydrology has been used to support water quality assessments and development of TMDL. Also FDC (Flow Duration Curve) analysis can be used as a general indicator of hydrologic condition. The LDC is developed by multiplying FDC with the numeric water quality target of the factor for the pollutant of concern. Therefore, this study was to create LDC using the stream flow data and numeric water quality target of BOD and T-P in order to evaluate the pollutant load characterization by flow conditions in Heukcheon stream. When it is to be a high-flows condition, BOD and T-P are necessary to manage. BOD and T-P did not satisfy the numeric water quality target for both seasons (spring and summer). In order to meet the numeric water quality target in Heukcheon stream, management of non point source pollutant is much more important than that of point source pollutant control.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.31 no.5B
• /
• pp.475-481
• /
• 2011

The TMDL standard flow as applying watershed management regime uses the average low flow of past 10 years. Moreover, the TMDL implementation assessment has been enforced through management of pollutant load satisfied objective water quality. Even though the present allocation and management through averaged low flow are still convenient, they are not enough to solve ultimate goals of watershed management to keep up recovery of water body. To maintain the same water quality concentration, the standard flow is required to consider total discharge in management plan which helps to keep healthy ecosystem. In view of this, it would be possible to approach reasonable assessment by reflecting variably changeable discharge from precipitation-streamflow relation and the TMDL standard establishment considering artificial regulated flow. Therefore, this study attempts to develop the TMDL method using Load Duration Curve (LDC) and Streamflow-Load Rating Curve (QLRC) considering total discharge and finds drawbacks with solutions as applying on Nakdong river TMDL unit watershed. Finally, this research evaluates possibility of application on pollutant load allocating and implementation assessment in Korea.

• Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers
• /
• v.37 no.8
• /
• pp.480-491
• /
• 2015

In this study, methods using LDC (Load Duration Curve) and watershed model were suggested to develope management targets and evaluate target achievement for non-point source pollution management considering watershed and runoff characteristics and possibility for achievement of target. These methods were applied for Saemangeum watershed which was designated as nonpoint source pollution management area recently. Flow duration interval of 5 to 40% was selected as flow range for management considering runoff characteristics and TP was selected as indicator for management. Management targets were developed based on scenarios for non-point source pollutant reduction of management priority areas using LDC method and HSPF model which was calibrated using 4 years data (2009~2012). In the scenario of LID, road sweeping and 50% reduction in CSOs and untreated sewage at Jeonju A20 and 30% reduction in fertilizer and 50% in livestock NPS at Mankyung C03, Dongjin A14 and KobuA14, management targets for Mangyung bridge, Dongjin bridge, Jeonju stream and Gunpo bridge were developed as TP 0.38, 0.18, 0.64 and 0.16 mg/L respectively. When TP loads at the target stations were assumed to have been reduced by a certain percentage (10%), management targets for those target stations were developed as TP 0.35, 0.17, 0.60 and 0.15 mg/L respectively. The result of this study is expected to be used as reference material for management master plan, implementation plan and implementation assessment for non-point source management area.

• Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.394-402
• /
• 2017

In korea, TMDL is being implemented to manage nonpoint pollution sources as well as point pollution sources. LDC is being used for the planning of TMDL. In order to analyze the water quality using LDC, it is necessary to prepare FDC using the daily flow data. However, only the daily flow data is measured at the WAMIS branch, and 8days flow data and water quality data are measured at the monitoring Networks. So, in many researches, the water quality is being grasped by deriving the LDC using the 8days flow or the daily flow obtained by various methods. These fluctuations may lead to differences in determining whether the target load is achieved. In this study, each LDC was prepared using the 8day flow and the related daily flow. Then, the effect using different flow data on the achievement of target load was compared according to flow conditions. As a result, the difference ratio in the number of overloads under flow condition was showed 19% in high flows, 42% in moist conditions, 49% in mid-range flows, 41% in dry conditions, and 104% in low flows. In the top ten watershed with the highest difference ratio, the flow became lower the difference ration increases. These differences can cause uncertainty in assessing the achievement of target load using LDC. Therefore, in order to evaluate the water quality accurately and reliably using LDC, accurate daily flow data and water quality data should be secured through the installation of national nonpoint measurement network.

• Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment
• /
• v.34 no.1
• /
• pp.33-45
• /
• 2018

In this study, we discussed the application of Watershed model and Load Duration Curves (LDC) in Total Water Load Management System. The Flow Duration Curves (FDC) and the LDC were generated using the results of the daily HSPF model and analyzed on monthly or yearly flow duration variability, and non-point pollutant discharge loads by entire flow conditions. As a result of the calibration and verification of the HSPF model, both the flow and the water quality were appropriately simulated. The simulated values were used to generate the Flow Duration Curve and the Load Duration Curve, and then the excess rate by entire flow conditions was analyzed. The point and non-point pollutant discharge loads for entire flow conditions were calculated. It is possible to evaluate the variability of water quality in specific flow duration through the curves reflecting the flow duration variability and to confirm the characteristics of the pollutant source. For a more scientific Total Water Load Management System, it is necessary to switch from a current system to a system that can take into account the entire flow conditions. For this, the application of the watershed model and load duration curve is considered to be the best alternative.