• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.242-250
• /
• 2011

The present study compared the contents and methods of elementary science education in schools and education institutes for the gifted and surveyed the contents and methods of science education for the gifted desired by students in order to set the direction of elementary science education at education institutes for the gifted. For this study, we conducted interviews with a 5th-grade male student and a 6th-grade female student at the science class of the Education Institutes for the Gifted run by Iksan Education Office. Besides, printed materials were collected and used to refer to the contents of education. The results of this study are as follows. First, in school, the student learn according to the curriculum defined by the government and the contents begin with elementary and basic ones and move step by step to deeper and wider scientific principles. On the contrary, in the education institute for the gifted, the contents of teaching materials are decided at the teacher's discretion, and because they target gifted children, their level is higher than that of the science curriculum in school. Second, the most common teaching method in school is lecturing and, next, experiments, group activities, etc. On the contrary, in the education institute for the gifted, experiments are used most frequently, and various educational methods are adopted including lectures, project learning and cyber learning. Third, the contents of science education that gifted children wanted to learn are not limited to any specific area. Science education methods that gifted children wanted were various, including project learning, group activities, experiments, and report making and presentation.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.59-66
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 로봇을 활용한 프로그래밍학습이 초등학생 및 초등영재들에게 창의력 향상에 도움을 주는 과학적인 학습도구라 판단되어 교육과정을 개발하였다. 이를 기초로 교재를 작성하고 현장에 직접 적용하여 그 결과를 분석하였다. 교육과정과 교재의 내용은 다양한 문제 상황에 맞는 로봇을 직접 제작하고 프로그래밍하는 과정(모두 6단계)으로 구분하고 학습수준에 맞게 편집함으로서 초등학생들이 로봇과 프로그래밍에 흥미와 관심을 가질 수 있도록 하였다. 로봇교육을 현장에 적용한 결과 창의성교육 도구로서 긍정적인 학습도구로 평가되었다. 또한, 수월성교육을 위한 학습도구로서 몇 가지 보완해야 할 결론도 함께 얻었다.

• 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보교육학회 2010년도 하계학술대회
• /
• pp.9-13
• /
• 2010

로봇을 통한 창의성과 문제해결력 신장에 대한 기대뿐만 아니라 영재교육 등의 다양한 요구에 의해 사교육 및 방과후학교 로봇교실은 매우 활성화되어 있다. 그러나 로봇교육은 인지적 영역뿐만 아니라 정의적 영역에 대한 효과도 매우 크게 기대되는데, 경제적 형편이 어려운 아동에게는 로봇키트 등의 가격 부담으로 균등한 기회조차 주워지지 못하는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 서울시의 u-러닝 사업의 일환으로 저소득층 아동들을 대상으로 통제집단과 실험 집단으로 나누어 무상으로 1년간 로봇교육을 실시하여, 정의적 영역과 인지적 영역 그리고 창의성의 유창성 부분에서 어떠한 변화가 일어나는지에 대한 관찰연구를 실시하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 서울시의 u-러닝 사업의 일환으로 저소득층 아동들을 대상으로 통제집단과 실험집단으로 나누어 무상으로 1년간 로봇교육을 실시하여, 정의적 영역과 인지적 영역 그리고 창의성의 유창성 부분에서 어떠한 변화가 일어나는지에 대한 사전사후 비교연구를 실시하고 있다. 현재까지 관찰로 아이들의 태도가 변화하는 성공사례들이 나타나고 있어, IT와 접목된 로봇교육을 통하여 저소득층 아동의 창의적이고 자발적인 태도를 육성하기 위한 가능성이 보여진다.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.341-355
• /
• 2014

이 연구는 2004년부터 2013년까지 일본수학교육학회 발행의 학술지 '산수교육'에 게재된 논문 196편을 분석 대상으로 하여 일본의 초등수학교육의 연구 동향을 제시하고, 이러한 분석결과를 토대로 우리나라 초등수학교육의 다양하고 균형 있는 연구를 위한 자료를 제공하는데 목적을 두고 수행하였다. 일본의 초등수학교육의 연구 동향을 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 논문의 분석 기준에 따라 연구주제로는 '수업설계 및 방법' (36.7%)이, 내용영역별로는 '수와 연산' (47.4%)이, 학년을 기준으로 하면 5, 6학년인 고학년 (21.4%)이 각 조사 영역에서 활발하게 연구되고 있었다. 특징적인 것으로 학술지 '산수교육'에서는 영재아와 부진아에 대한 연구는 찾을 수 없었고 장애아에 대한 연구 (1.0%)는 극소수 이루어지고 있었다.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2014

현대사회에서 발생하는 복합적인 문제들은 정보 논리적 사고를 통해 효율적으로 해결할 수 있으며, 정보 논리적 사고력은 정보 교과의 프로그래밍 교육을 통해 효과적으로 신장시킬 수 있다. 본 연구는 학습자의 흥미를 유발하고 집중도를 높일 수 있는 정보 교과 STEAM 커리큘럼을 설계하였고 이를 적용 및 평가하였다. 커리큘럼은 자기 주도적 학습과 조별 학습을 통하여 학습자 간에 상호작용이 이루어질 수 있도록 하였으며 하나의 주제를 가지고 과학, 음악, 정보 교과의 관련 지식을 이해할 수 있도록 구성하였다. 실험은 초등학교 4~6학년에 재학 중인 정보 영재 학생들을 대상으로 아두이노 보드를 활용하여 진행하였다. 연구 결과, 아두이노를 활용한 수업 후에 컴퓨터 과목에 대한 관심도와 프로그래밍에 대한 흥미도가 증가하였다. 75%의 학생들이 컴퓨터에 대한 흥미가 늘어났고 93%의 학생들이 아두이노를 활용한 수업에 긍정적인 응답을 하였다. 연구 결과의 유효성은 t-test를 통해 입증하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.27-38
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to develop a test of a creative problem solving (CPS) for the selection of gifted science students in elementary school. For this, the methods and procedures of the selection of gifted science students was investigated through the internet homepages 23 gifted science education centers of universities and 16 city. province offices of education. The results of this study were as follows: Most of the gifted science students were selected through a multi-step examination process. They were selected on the basis of their records by recommendation of a principal or a classroom teacher in their school, by operation of standardized tests (ex. intelligence quotient score, achievements in science and mathematics, interest and attitude/aptitude for science as well as through other means), as well as through intensive observation of those gifted science students who are selected by interview and oral tests. The selection of gifted students was not evaluated through creativity testing; giftedness in city. province office of education. Testing of CPS was found to be especially lacking in these organizations. For the development of the test items of CPS in science, the five elements were extracted through the framework for the content analysis of the CPS: problem exploration, problem statement, solution thinking, experiment design, and assesment. In addition, suggestions were made regarding an appropriate scoring system for the test of the CPS. As the result of the developed test was applied to the 4th grade of the gifted and general student, we found that gifted students were superior to general students. In conclusion, it was that the CPS test developed in this study should be used to evaluate the CPS for the selection of gifted students.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.441-450
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of elementary gifted students' argumentation and examine the special features of argumentation founded in scientific inquiry. 28 students were selected in the special education center for the gifted in K National University. They were organized 8 groups of 3~4 students and engaged in scientific inquiry activity. The researcher wasn't involved in students' inquiry activity and argumentation except for the guiding and introducing their activity. In the first session, each group carried out the experiment 'Putting a heated can in the water' and then, the students discussed to probe their experimental results and build their explanation. In the second session, each group presented their experiment results and evidence from their experiment justifying their claims, and had questions from other groups. The protocol data during 8 groups' argumentations were analyzed using 'Rubric for Scientific Argumentation Assessment' (Yang et al., 2009) in three domains- the form, content and attitude. As a result, in form domain, almost groups were rated 2 points due to their argument without rebuttal on the subcategory of 'composition', but they got a good grade above 3 points in subcategory such as 'claim', 'ground', and 'conclusion'. In content domain, almost groups got points above 3 points. In attitude domain, there were some striking contrast between each groups. Six groups got good score more than 4 points on the subcategory of openness, but two groups, they alleged and got score below 3 point. While the 6 groups of all got 4 points in the aspect of participation, 3 groups got 3 points lower than because they only just asserted and not interact with other groups. Throughout the argumentation, two features were found that; as time goes by, arguments were refined; Students tended to use their prior to knowledge rather than evidence such as experimental data in making claims and conclusions.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.172-186
• /
• 1993

This stady was carried out to define Gifted student for science, model for selection, the tools and methods and related theory for the selection of the Gifted students for the science in primary school level. Also the developed tools and materials are applied to student and analysed the results to generalize the methods for the selection of Gifted students for science. The definition of Gifted students for science was carried out by the three-ring conception model by Renzulli(1982) and Lee long-Sung which defined the characteristics as three parts such as above average ability, creativity and tesk comitment. The Gifted students for science upper 2 percent which have three characteristics at the same times, namely overlapping three characteristics. The model for the selection of Gifted students consist of four step; such as screeing, selection,differentiation, judgement. The materials for the selection are input at each stage, analysed the results and standard for the selection are made. In the first stage screening, 202 students are selected from the 5060 of 4th and 5th graders according to their achievment, intellecture ability and observation of students activity. In second selection and third differentiation stage, 65 students are seletted according to their achievement In this study it is approved that the Gifted students in science have to be selection by various test such as achievement, intellectual ability, aptitude in science, inquiry activity, manual skill etc, rather rather then simple test such as achievement and intellecture ability. Also it is important to select upper 2 percent who have general abilites overlapping three characteristics mentioned in definition of Gifted students in science and selections model

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.125-143
• /
• 2014

본 연구에서는 의사소통적 갈등과 인지 갈등의 관계를 확인하기 위해 과학영재학교 3학년 미적분학II 수업시간에 이루어진 수학적 토론 및 개별 면담 사례를 분석하였다. 교실에서 수학적 토론은 접촉평면에 관하여 인지 갈등을 보이는 한 학생의 질문에서 시작되었다. 분석 결과 토론 과정에서 사회적으로 구성된 지식을 관습화하여 사용함으로서 의사소통적 갈등이 해소되고 있지만 인지 갈등은 완전히 해소되지 않고 있음을 확인하였다. 또한 토론을 촉발한 학생의 인지 갈등의 원인이 불완전한 유추의 사용에서 비롯되었음을 확인하였으며, 유추 활동에 대한 반성적 담론의 조성이 인지 갈등을 극복하는 학습 기회가 된다는 것을 발견하였다. 본 연구를 통해 인지 갈등이 의사소통적 갈등의 출현을 촉발할 수 있지만, 의사소통적 갈등의 해소가 인지 갈등의 해소를 함의하지는 않는다는 것을 알 수 있다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.152-166
• /
• 2013

The main purpose of this study is to see the differences of the achievement goal orientation, academic burnout, and school happiness between gifted and general students, and also to explore the effects on school happiness of their achievement goal orientation and academic burnout. To resolve the above research questions, this study used questionnaire method to 256 1st grade middle school students and 84 gifted students enrolled in Daegu metropolitan city. All data were analyzed by SPSS WIN 19.0 program. The results of this study are as follows. First, mastery goal, performance-approach goal and performance-avoidance goal of the gifted students were higher than the general students'. Second, all sub-variables of academic burnout except hostility and total score of academic burnout of the gifted students were lower than the general students. On the other hand, all sub-variables of school happiness except relationship with friends and emotional stability and total score school happiness of the gifted students were higher than the general students. Third, this study revealed that the achievement goal and academic burnout explain considerable amount of students' school happiness. In other words, the disfavor and skeptical attitude of general students for the study hinder school happiness. Lastly, this study suggest that some program or consulting need to be administerd to change the affective attitude of students into positively. And also variety of counselling program or some instructions dealing with stress for gifted students since the exhaustion of gifted students affects considerably their school happiness.