• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.36-69
• /
• 2009

This work aims to firstly know what does the inside and outside participants perceive the system itself and its execution in the evaluation of the research institutes in science and technology sector which has been introduced in 1999, and to secondly discuss how can diverse perceptions among participants be integrated in the institutional and operational aspects. This has been conducted mainly by in-depth interviews with 99 staffs from 10 research institutes under the Korea Research Council for Public Technology as well as with 10 members of evaluation committee for research institutes. According to the in-depth interviews, the both inside and outside participants perceive that the evaluation of research institutes can be necessary and useful for the management of the institute itself and R&D programs in view of the strategic reasons as well as practical one. Despite of the affirmative perceptions to the evaluation of research institute, based on the common or individual experiences, they have also suggested that there will be lots of improvements in the individual components of evaluation system and its current status of execution.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2022.10a
• /
• pp.203-204
• /
• 2022

본 논문에서는 공공기관에서 안전보건경영시스템으로 KOSHA-MS를 구축하여 유지하고 있습니다. 2022년 1월 27일 시행된 중대재해처벌법에 대한 준비와 대책을 수립하고 있으며, 공공기관 안전활동 수준평가, 공공기관 안전관리등급제 등 여러 평가를 받고 있습니다. 이에 안전보건경영시스템(KOSHA-MS) 규정에 중대재해처벌법과 관련법규의 연계와 공공기관 안전활동 수준평가, 공공기관 안전관리등급제까지 연계 방안을 연구하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.41-42
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 국내 주요 연구기관 사이트를 대상으로 웹 접근성 실태 조사를 하였다. 연구기관의 구체적인 웹 접근성 준수 실태 파악을 위해 자동화 평가도구인 K-WAH 4.0을 사용하였다. 평가 결과 국내의 20여개의 연구기관 중 6개의 연구기관만이 웹 접근성 마크를 획득하였으며 획득한 연구기관의 준수율은 96%, 획득하지 못한 연구기관의 준수율은 86%, 전체 평균 준수율 89%로 접근성 마크를 획득한 연구기관이 획득하지 못한 연구기관에 비하여 다소 높은 것으로 나타났지만 웹 접근성마크를 받은 연구기관 중 웹 접근성을 100% 준수하는 사이트를 발견하지 못하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 연구기관 사이트 중 잘 지켜지지 않은 항목들을 파악한 후 국내 연구기관 웹 사이트의 접근성 수준 향상에 기여하고자 한다.

• Annual Conference of KIPS
• /
• 2012.11a
• /
• pp.1632-1635
• /
• 2012

연구기관의 연구 활동에 대한 평가는 연구기관에 소속된 연구자들의 논문으로 연구 활동을 분석함으로써 이루어질 수 있다. 논문으로 연구 활동을 분석하여 연구기관에 대한 평가를 하기 위해서는 논문을 작성한 저자의 소속기관이 가장 먼저 식별되어야 한다. 본 논문에서는 국내 과학학술지 논문에 대한 저자의 소속 연구기관을 식별하는 시스템을 구축하여 각 연구기관의 연구 활동에 대하여 분석해 보았다. 이러한 시스템을 기반으로 연구기관별 논문 수, 피인용 횟수, 1회 이상 피인용 된 논문 수 등의 기본 연구 활동을 분석하여 얻은 결과는 연구 기관 평가의 근거로 사용할 있으며, 나아가 특정 분야에서 강세를 보이는 연구기관과 연구기관끼리의 협업 관계를 분석하여 정책에 활용할 수도 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2005.08a
• /
• pp.393-400
• /
• 2005

기관 리포지토리에 대한 개념적 평가모형을 개발하기 위하여 국내외 기관 리포지토리에 대한 문헌연구를 통하여 평가요소를 도출하였으며, 도출된 평가 요소들이 도서관 업무 현장에서의 적용가능성과 타당성을 검증하기 위하여 전국 7개 대학도서관을 대상으로 사례연구를 실시하였다. 연구결과, 4개 평가영역과 29개 평가지표로 구성된 평가모형을 개발하였다.

• Annual Conference of KIPS
• /
• 2004.05a
• /
• pp.837-840
• /
• 2004

본 연구는 행정기관 홈페이지 평가 항목 중에 접근성에 관한 새로운 세부항목 평가 기준을 제시하고 시각디자인적인 요소를 중심으로 웹사이트 평가를 행한 결과를 제시한다 평가 기준을 가독성, 위치성, 구조성, 심미성, 편의성 등의 6 가지 기준으로 나누고 평가한 결과, 현재 공공기관 웹사이트는 심미성, 위치성에 관한 항목들이 매우 잘 만들어져 가고 있는 반면, 기관들의 웹사이트 가독성과 일관성의 통합 작업이 부족함을 알게 되고 보완의 가이드 라인을 제시할 수 있게 되었다. 본 연구의 결과가 시각디자인 요소를 중심으로 한 사용자 인터페이스 디자인의 표준모델의 일부로 활용되어 공공기관 웹사이트를 이용한 대민 서비스의 질적 향상과 기관 이미지 제고에 이바지 할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.66
• /
• pp.105-155
• /
• 2020

Research records are a type of record with a range of controversies over the core elements of management, such as the definition and scope of research records, and who manages research records, despite the critical need for their management. Research records have been neglected in blind spots because it is difficult to manage them, but if well managed, they are evaluated as records with a highly potential value that can be used infinitely later. In particular, government-funded research institutes, as both research institutes and public institutions, take responsibility for systematic management of these research records. Therefore, as this study noted the necessity of research records appraisal for the systematic management of research records in government-funded research institutes, and conducted interviews with 11 records managers working at government-funded research institutes in Korea, the current status of research records management and appraisal of government-funded research institutes was identified. As a result, improvement measures for research records appraisal was suggested as follows. First of all, in the light of the current public records appraisal system, there is a problem of effectiveness in applying it to the research record appraisal system as it is. Therefore, this study suggested that an appraisal system appropriate for research records was needed, and proposed plans for improving the research records appraisal system in terms of purposes, authority, methods, time point, tools and criteria for appraisal.

• Economic and Environmental Geology
• /
• v.49 no.4
• /
• pp.325-333
• /
• 2016

The Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) introduced its new Mission Oriented Evaluation System (MOES) for government affiliated research institutes and Government Supported Research Institutes (GSRI) on science and technology in 2013. The Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) is the first MOES applied Science and Technology (S&T) GSRI, that has research divisions focusing on geoscience and geological surveys, mineral resources extraction and utilization, petroleum extraction and marine mineral research, and geological applied and environment research. In appling the final evaluation of MOES on KIGAM, we found difficulty classifing the concepts of research excellence and risk (innovativeness) in guidelines of Research Evaluation Indicators (REIs) of MSIP. We have developed quantitative and qualitative indicators that can present research excellence and risk (innovativeness) through the KIGAM World Class Laboratory (WCL) strategy and related studies, innovative research and development guidelines of MSIP (2013a) and honorable R&D failure guidelines of MSIP (2013b). We have applied our developed REIs in KIGAM which handles basic research, applied and development research and public services. Therefore, our developed REIs can be effectively applied in every S&T GSRI.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.31 no.3
• /
• pp.125-149
• /
• 2020

This study examined the problems of evaluating records management institutions of District Offices of Education (DOE) and conducted literature reviews, surveys, and in-depth interviews to suggest improvement measures. This study analyzed survey questions (response rate 52.8%) of records management officers in charge of records management in 176 DOE and in-depth interviews of records managers from 15 institutions who agreed to participate. Based on the analysis of the surveys and interviews, a further interview was conducted with a records manager responsible for records management institution evaluation at the National Archives of Korea (NAK). All of the results were aggregated to derive improvement measures in the areas of evaluation environment, agents of evaluation, and evaluation policy. The results of this study can be used as references to implement evaluations for records management institutions that reflect the characteristic of each institution type.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.87-98
• /
• 2012

The Ministry of Education, Science and Technology has been implementing the government's recognition project regarding the program accrediting organizations in Higher Education. This research is to establish an evaluation model for the government's recognition process of the program accrediting organizations, and develop the evaluation categories, items and indices for the model. The research has set the concept for the government's recognition regarding the program accrediting organizations and designed an evaluation model for such organizations. The evaluation model embraces a preliminary evaluation process, assessing an eligibility of the accrediting organizations for the higher education based on the formalities set forth for the government recognition organization accrediting process. It also includes the main evaluation process, which assess the eligibility based on the evaluation standards stipulated in the associated legislation and regulations. In addition, through in-depth verification processes by experts, this research finalized 2 evaluation domains, 5 evaluation categories, 24 evaluation items and 33 evaluation indices.