DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Improvement for Evaluation of Records Management Institutions in the District Offices of Education

교육지원청 기록관리 기관평가 개선방안에 관한 연구

  • 윤영조 (이화여자대학교 정책과학대학원 기록관리학과) ;
  • 정연경 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2020.08.19
  • Accepted : 2020.09.07
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

This study examined the problems of evaluating records management institutions of District Offices of Education (DOE) and conducted literature reviews, surveys, and in-depth interviews to suggest improvement measures. This study analyzed survey questions (response rate 52.8%) of records management officers in charge of records management in 176 DOE and in-depth interviews of records managers from 15 institutions who agreed to participate. Based on the analysis of the surveys and interviews, a further interview was conducted with a records manager responsible for records management institution evaluation at the National Archives of Korea (NAK). All of the results were aggregated to derive improvement measures in the areas of evaluation environment, agents of evaluation, and evaluation policy. The results of this study can be used as references to implement evaluations for records management institutions that reflect the characteristic of each institution type.

본 연구는 교육지원청의 기록관리 기관평가에 대한 문제점을 살펴보고 개선방안을 제시하고자 문헌연구, 설문조사, 심층면담을 수행하였다. 전국 교육지원청 176개 기관의 기록관리 업무담당자를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시(응답율 52.8%)하고 심층면담에 동의한 15개 기관의 기록물관리전문요원과 면담을 진행하였다. 설문 및 면담 분석 결과를 바탕으로 국가기록원 기록관리 기관평가 업무담당자와 면담을 진행한 후, 이를 종합하여 도출된 개선방안을 평가 환경, 평가 주체, 평가 제도적 측면으로 구분하여 제시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 기관 유형별 특수성을 반영한 기록관리 기관평가를 시행하는데 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Dong-kyun and Hae-Young Rieh. 2016. "Improvement Direction of the Public Records Management System for the Application of MSR(Management System for Records)." Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(4): 121-148. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.4.121
  2. National Archives of Korea. 2019a. A Study on Development of Records Management Evaluation Method and Development of Evaluation Tool. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  3. National Archives of Korea. 2019b. 2019(2018 Results) Records Management Evaluation Results. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  4. National Archives of Korea. 2019c. 2020(2019 Results) Records Management Evaluation Plans. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  5. National Archives of Korea. 2019d. Improvements to the Evaluation System of Records Management Institutions. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  6. Kwon, Do-Gyun. 2016a. "A Study on the Problems in and the Improvement of the Archives Evaluation System: Focusing on the Metropolitan Office of Education." The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 48: 179-207.
  7. Kwon, Do-Gyun. 2016b. "A Study on the Issue and Resolving the Institutional Evaluation System: Targets of the 2017 Education Department Indicator" The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 49: 51-75.
  8. Kim, Sol. 2010. A Study on the Improvement the Archives Evaluation System: Focus on the Redesign the Evaluation Indicators in the Archives Management System. M.A. thesis. University of Dankook.
  9. Kim, Ji-Hoon. 2014. A Study on the Check-up 2.0 of the Agency Assessment Tool of the Australian "Digital Transition Policy": In Connection with the Assessment Tool of Agency of Korea. M.A. thesis. University of Myongji.
  10. Park, Jong Yeon, Hae-Young Rieh, Hyo-Sun Seo, and Woo-Hee Kim. 2019. "Current Status and Improvement Plan for Evaluation System of Records Management in Public Institutions." Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 19(1): 251-274. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2019.19.1.251
  11. Yang, Ok-Kyung. 2000. "Qualitative Research on the Concepts of Family in Korea." Korean Journal of Family Social Work, 6: 69-99.
  12. Lee, Young-Sook and Kwon-ju Cheon. 2006. "A Study on the Introduction of the Government Agencies' Records Management Assessment System." Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 6(2): 27-56.
  13. Lee, Eul-Ji and Ho-sin Lee. 2016. "A Study on the Analysis of the Tasks of Record Managers in Offices of Education." Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(3): 131-156. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.3.131
  14. Lim, Hee-Yeon. 2018. "A New Model of Records Centers, Integration Archives: Reorganization of the Education office Records Centers." The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 58: 31-63.
  15. Chang, Yeon-Jip. 2000. "Psychology of Health Care and Phenomenological Qualitative Study." Journal of Qualitative Research, 1: 13-24.
  16. Jeon, Soo-Jin. 2008. "Development of Evaluation Indicators of the Records Management Condition of Public Organizations." The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 18: 3-36.
  17. Choi, Hyun-Nan. 2010. A Study on the Evaluation Indicators Development of Records Management in Records Center. M.A. thesis. University of Hannam.
  18. The Research Institute for Korean Archives and Records. 2006. Measures for the Systematic Expansion of a National Standard for Records Management. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  19. The Research Institute for Korean Archives and Records. 2007. Development of Tools for Expanded Implementation of Records Management Standards. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  20. 공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률 .
  21. 공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률 시행령