• Venture DIGEST
• /
• s.137
• /
• pp.37-37
• /
• 2009

사업을 영위하다보면 종업원이 행한 행정법규 위반행위에 대하여 그 영업주에 대하여도 형벌을 부과하는 경우를 본 적이 있을 것이다. 이처럼 종업원의 비위행위로 영업주가 예상치 못한 처벌을 받는 경우가 흔하게 있었는데, 최근 헌법재판소에서 양벌규정의 위헌상 여부에 대한 결정을 내려 사회적 이목이 집중되고 있다.

• Proceedings of the Safety Management and Science Conference
• /
• 2012.04a
• /
• pp.337-347
• /
• 2012

본 논문은 개인정보보호법의 벌칙조항 및 양벌규정을 기관 및 기업체의 CEO 및 최고경영자의 관점에서 제 70조에서 제75조의 벌칙조항을 구체적이고 간결하게 기술하였다. 이 논문의 주요 구성은 제정된 개인정보보호법에 관하여 먼저, 개인정보의 정의, 개인정보의 유형, 개인정보의 특성을 알아보았다. 또한 개인정보보호법에 대한 주요내용과 경영진의 주요 관심사인 개인정보보호법의 처벌조항과 양벌규정에 대해 연구하였다.

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• s.413
• /
• pp.43-45
• /
• 2014

• 정보보호뉴스
• /
• s.137
• /
• pp.50-53
• /
• 2009

최근 기업의 영업활동보장을 위해 각종 규제와 규정은 삭제되거나 완화되는 추세이며, 심지어 기업에 대한 형사처벌규정인 양벌규정까지 폐지하자는 논의가 있다. 그러나 개인정보보호 관련 규제와 규정은 전혀 다르다. 2008년에 유출사고가 연이어 발생하면서 '정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호에 관한 법률'이 전면개정 되고, '개인정보보호법' 신설 움직임이 진행되는 등 개인정보보호 영역에서는 기업의 영업활동에 영향을 미치는 규제와 법률은 강화되고 있다. 본 기고는 두 법 중 2008년 12월부터 시행되어 법적효력을 가지고 있는 '정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호에 관한 법률(이하 정보통신망법)'의 개정내용이 기업체에 미치는 영향에 대해 소개하고자 한다.

• Environmental engineer
• /
• v.23 s.244
• /
• pp.2-6
• /
• 2006

‘환경정책을 입안할 때는 현장에서 직접 관련업에 종사하고 있는 환경기술인들의 의견이 구체적으로 반영되어야 합니다.’ 다년간 환경기술인 생활을 하다가 10여년 전부터 환경산업체인 유한회사 동양 환경 건설의 대표이사직을 맡고 있는 한상온 사장은 현장의 목소리가 정책에 많이 반영 되기를 바라고 있다. 한 사장은 또 현행 양벌 규정에 대해서도 다소 불합리하다고 강조했다. 본지는 지난 23일 연합회 회의실에서 한상온 사장을 만나 그의 환경관을 들어봤다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.149-179
• /
• 2010

In November 2007, the Korean Constiutional Court held that a joint penal provision in which the individual employer is punished when his or her employee is determined to have committed a crime was unconstitutional, because the joint penal provision had no contents for the culpability of an individual employer and thus violated the constitutionally protected principle of culpability. After the Korean Constitutional Court's judgment, since December 2008 the Ministry of Justice began to change the old joint penal provision into the new revised joint penal provision. On January 2010, the old joint penal provisions of 110 laws were revised. The new revised joint penal provision adds only an additional sentence: "If a juristic person, an entity or an individual perform due care and supervision over its employee for the prevention of such a crime, it will be exempted from the punishment". But an presumption of negligence clause that is added in the new revised joint penal provision is still vacuum in concerned with supervision responsibility. Probably the new form of penal provision, that is understood to be a kind of the presumption of negligence, could let the burden of proof be changed from the public prosecutor to the accused, in other words employer-side. Especially, when joint penal provision is applied to hospital as administrative punishment, according to the hospital is a (juridical) foundation or not, the application of the joint penal provision is different and unfaithful. In my opinion, therefore, a corporation liability could be considered according to various liability of employee's business and the crime its employee committed because of an organizational failure of the corporation.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.209-218
• /
• 2017

In Korea, child abuse in child care centers occurs continuously, and it is becoming a social problem. The government has intensified the supervision of management in child care centers, and through strong countermeasures and prevention against child abuse, it enacted the special act on child abuse in oder to enable children to become healthy members of society. In this study, this researcher gasped the legal application on child abusers, and analysed how the punishment for abusers changed according to the application of the special act on child abuse, through examining precedents of child abuse in child care centers. 21 cases related to child abuse cases were collected by searching homepage of the supreme court and each district court in this study. As a result of analyzing the precedents, the sentence of the defendant did not increase greatly, and it differed from the criminal identification of the people in cases of child abuse on which the special act on child abuse was applied. Therefore, it can be seen that there is a demand for more rigorous legal application for abusers in order to prevent child abuse in child care centers.

• Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
• /
• v.7 no.5
• /
• pp.157-167
• /
• 2017

This study aims to establish measures to prevent emotional abuse by analyzing court precedents related to emotional abuse at daycare centers of Korea. For this, ten precedents of first trial and four precedents of appellate trial related to emotional abuse were analyzed in depth. In the results of study, there were diverse types of emotional abuse at daycare centers such as assaulting(hitting head, face, and buttocks with hands and feet), throwing things, neglecting, forcefully feeding food, stopping mouth with handkerchief and wet tissue, skipping meals, and showing scary images. And the main issues of precedents included the matter of justifiable act as circumstances precluding wrongfulness, and the matter of applying the joint penal provision. Based on such results, the measures to prevent emotional abuse at daycare centers were suggested.