• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.10
• /
• pp.774-787
• /
• 2021

This thesis is a follow-up study on HwangJeNaeGyeogSoMun(SoMun). Its purpose is the usage of '心' letter used in HwangjenaegyeogYoungChu(YoungChu). The original manuscript of this study was the Hu's Gulin Sanctum of YoungChu. It was conducted by a literature review. Typically, the word '心' means a tangible heart and an intangible mind in the same form. Therefore, in order to understand the contents of the YoungChu, which provides the basis for the basic ideology related to health care, meditation, GiGong training, yoga, practice and oriental medicine, it is necessary to understand the meaning of the word '心' letter. The results of this study are as follows. First, it means human heart. Second, it means the human chest. Third, it means mind such as angry, joy sad, fear and so on. Fourth, it means the transcendent concept like spiritual enlightenment. Fifth, it means the pericardium. Sixth, it means logical thinking. Seventh, it means center or core, Eighth, it means the name of the constellation in the eastern sky of ancient Asia. Ninth, it can be classified into the inside. It can be used as a basic data to understand the contents of YoungChu related to various categories. The limitation of it is that the classification of the '心' letter may be different from the researchers' perspective.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.5
• /
• pp.824-836
• /
• 2021

In this study, the use of '心' letter used in classic Chinese book of 『Hwangjenaegyeog』 and its meaning was examined. In Chinese letters, '肉' is a sign that symbolizes the body. The letters '肝', '脾', '肺', and '腎' expressing the five human organs all contain the form of '肉'. So they don't cause semantic confusion. However, the Chinese letter that means heart and mind are written as '心'. As a result, it is difficult to understand the meaning of '心'. In addition, the contents of 『Hwangjenaegyeog』 cover various fields from disease to astronomy. For this reason, a total of 286 '心' letters used in it have various meanings. The results of this study are as follows. First, it means human heart. Second, it means the human chest. Third, it refers to mind. Fourth, it means a transcendent concept like spiritual enlightenment. Fifth, it refers to pericardium. Sixth, it refers to logical thought Seventh, it means center or core, and finally does constellation. in the eastern sky of ancient Asia. The results of this study are thought to be helpful in grasping the meaning of '心' in the classical literature as well as in 『hwangjenaegyeonglyeongchu』.

• The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
• /
• no.35
• /
• pp.7-42
• /
• 2012

The Ho-Rak controversy is an internal dispute in the Kiho School. Both Ho and Rak adopt the theories of Yulgok(栗谷) as their common standard of right arguments. The controversy continues almost two hundred years after the dispute between LEE Gan(李柬) and HAN Wonjin(韓元震). However, it does not develop rich theoretical resources. The fundamental issue of Ho-Rak controversy is how to define the relation of mind(心) and temper(氣質). Ho School regard temper as material of the mind, and so they insist that mind and temper are ultimately the same. But Rak School regard temper as desire of the body, and so they insist that mind and temper are the another one. The viewpoint of Rak School does not correspond to the view of the traditional Neo-confucianism. So we should understand that mind and temper are ultimately the same. However if we define that mind and temper are the same, and they act at the same time, then we can not insure the foundation of pure goodness in human mind. LEE Chulyoung(李喆榮) defines that mind and temper are ultimately the same, but they act alternately. It is the exact definition about the relation of mind and temper.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.123
• /
• pp.189-208
• /
• 2012

"관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)은 전국 말 직하황노도가(稷下黃老道家)의 문헌으로 중국철학사에 있어 매우 중요한 위치를 점하고 있다. 하지만 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)은 문헌과 저자에 대한 기록이 불확실하고 제자백가의 사상을 포괄적으로 수용 복잡한 사상체계를 형성하고 있기 때문에 오랜시간 사람들의 주목을 받지 못했다. 1940년대 학자들은 중국철학 사료를 다시 정리하였고 이때 곽말약(郭沫若)에 의해 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)의 명칭이 처음으로 등장하게 된다. 1994년 "직하황노학파적비판(稷下黃老學派的批判)"과 "송견윤문유저고"에서 곽말약(郭沫若)이 "관자(管子)" 가운데 "심술(心術)" 상하(上下), "백심(白心)", "내업(內業)"의 사편(四篇)를 송견(宋?)과 윤문(尹文)의 저작이라고 주장한 이래 고문헌의 출토와 더불어 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)는 다시 학계의 관심을 받기 시작한다. "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)의 저작 시기는 전국말로 추정된다. 이 시기는 사상의 르네상스라고 불릴 만큼 많은 학자들이 저마다의 독특한 논리들로서 당시의 사회의 문제점을 직시하고 그 해결방안을 모색하였던 시대였다. 농업생산력의 향상과 교통의 발달로 많은 지식인은 제(齊)나라의 직하(稷下)에 모여 전대의 역사적, 철학적 유산을 기반으로 심(心)과 도(道)에 관한 논의를 벌였고, 그 통합적 저작물이 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)이다. 때문에 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)는 전국시대 제자학(諸子學)을 총정리하는 종합서의 성격을 가진다. 본 연구의 목적은 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)에 나타나는 심(心)개념의 연구를 통해 전국말 직하황노도가(稷下黃老道家)의 심(心)에 대한 이해를 살펴보는데 있다. 이를 위해 먼저, "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)의 중심철학범주인 도(道), 기(氣), 정기(精氣)와 심(心)의 관계에 대하여 살펴보고, 다음으로 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)에 보이는 심(心)의 개념분석을 통하여 구체적인 심(心)의 구조와 기능에 대하여 탐색할 것이다. 그리고 마지막으로 심(心)과 그 수양론(修養論)에 대하여 검토할 것이다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.11 no.8
• /
• pp.349-358
• /
• 2013

This thesis is a study on Zhuang-zi's theory of self-cultivation. "Mind" is an important concept in Zhuang-zi's philosophy. According to Zhuang-zi "mind" has dual character and its basic state includes the mind which is in keeping with Tao and the mind which is not. They separately refer to mind's natural state(靈府靈臺 之心) and unnatural state(成心). The former is compatible and harmonious while the latter is contradictory. The accomplishment of mind eventually means transcending unnatural mind and attaining mind's natural state. To realize natural mind, Zhuang-zi propose xinzhai(心齋)and zuowang(坐忘).

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.130
• /
• pp.363-380
• /
• 2014

유식불교에서 신(身)은 안 이 비 설 신 5근(根)을 갖춘 몸인 유근신(有根身)이며, 심(心)은 일단 의식을 일으키는 것, 즉 의식(意識)의 소의(所依)인 의근(意根)이다. 유식은 불교 본래의 무아론적 관점에 따라 의근은 개별적 사유 실체로서의 자아도 아니고, 그렇다고 5근과 마찬가지의 색법, 즉 물리적 심장이나 뇌일 수도 없으며, 나아가 이전 순간의 의식에 불과한 것도 아니라고 논한다. 따라서 유식은 의근을 제6의식과 구별되는 또 다른 식, 제7말나식(자아식)으로 간주한다. 그러나 유식에서 말나식은 실재하는 식이 아니라, 자신(자아)이 실재하지 않는다는 무아(無我)를 모르는 한, 존재하는 망상의 식, 비량(非量)의 식이다. 즉 말나식은 자신보다 더 심층의 식인 제8아뢰야식(일체 현상세계를 형성하는 근본식)의 활동을 알지 못하는 무명 불각(不覺)으로 인해, 자신을 그 세계 속 일부분인 유근신의 주체(자아)로 여기고 집착하는 식이다. 결국 유식에서 궁극의 심(心)은 견(見) 상(相)으로 이원화되기 전의 심층 아뢰야식이고, 개별적인 신(身)과 물리적 세계는 모두 그 아뢰야식의 변현 결과이다.

• The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
• /
• no.31
• /
• pp.289-319
• /
• 2011

Chutzu has established a theory of human mind and moral mind(人心道心說) by quoting the key of cultivation of mind comprised of sixteen letters(十六字心法) to a preface of Zhongyong(中庸章句序) and making comments on the key. Chutzu's theory of human mind and moral mind explains the supervision of mind that materializes chung-ho(中和), which is the core theme of Zhongyong(中庸). Supervision of mind is completed by consciousness. Chutzu defines consciousness as 'preparing the principle(理) and practicing the emotion(情)'. So, consciousness derives the reaction from the principle(理) in order to respond to the external stimulation. By being conscious, mind(心) reveals original nature(性) into emotion(情). An aspect that mind(心) keeps original nature prior to the external stimulation is un-awakened(未發). Once stimulation occurs, mind(心) becomes conscious of the principle which is proper to the situation. In sympathetic situation, sympathetic emotion is revealed by being conscious of benevolence(仁). In judgment situation, the emotion which judges right or wrong is revealed by being conscious of wisdom(智). An aspect of revealing the proper emotion relevant to the situation is wakened(已發). Mind(心) keeps all the original nature of benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom(仁義禮智). It supervises original nature and emotion, and reveals chung-ho(中和) by being conscious of the proper principle(理). Moral mind must supervise to accomplish chung-ho(中和), and gewuzhizhi(格物致知) must be done first to enhance the supervision of moral mind. By establishing a theory of human mind and moral mind(人心道心說), Chutzu completes a theory of mind that covers both theories of chung-ho(中和說) and gewuzhizhi(格物致知說).

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.153-178
• /
• 2009

隨著文明的發達, 強度越來越大的夜生活使現代人的睡眠經常不能維持身體生理之所需. 可見, 對維持現代人的健康所需的睡眠的重要性, 不可隨便看過. 近來, 西醫學提出, 睡眠對於生命體起著恢複元氣的功能機能. 心臟從人出生到死亡, 始終搏動不已. 這一心臟的搏動, 實際上亦有緩急之差, 人的感情愈是安定, 心搏便愈會緩慢而安寧. 一般人在睡眠時, 其意識也會處於休息狀態, 結果心情得到鎮定, 心搏也變得安定, 從而使心臟也得到相應休息. 人的神志活動的物質基礎爲血, 而血的生成則是在中焦完成的. 肝藏血的功能是與心主血的功能相關的重要機能, 肝藏血是在人睡臥時形成的. 這種與血有關的心, 肝, 脾的相關性在神志活動中亦會有所表現, 而寤寐亦可看做是神志活動的一部分. 所謂睡眠是指意識活動停止的休息狀態, 屬於生命的基本現象, 乃人體生存的不可缺少的一個方面, 而活動狀態則爲相反的概念, 亦即生命的休息狀態. 至於睡眠障礙, 大致可分不眠和嗜眠兩類. 關於心臟與睡眠的相關性, 若心臟采取休息的睡眠時間有所減少, 將引起心臟的過勞, 結果可誘發心臟病的發作. 就象自然界中存在晝夜一樣, 人體也存在著寤寐, 這說明人也是自然的一部分, 只有晝間活動夜晚睡覺, 才是順應於自然的生命規律.

• The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
• /
• no.36
• /
• pp.43-74
• /
• 2013

This paper aims to analyse Han Wonjin's criticism centered on Kim Changhyup's theory of Jigak(知覺). In the early 18th century, Kim Changhyup whose position considered as the leader of Rakhak(洛學) circle was the central figure in the debate on the controversial subject of Jigak. Han Wonjin as an opinion leader of Hohak(湖學)'s legacy was required to argue with his counterpart in order to establish his circle's standpoint. The main issue they discussed was the relationship between Ji(智) and Jigak. Kim contends that Ji and Jigak belong to different categories, and that the substance-function(體用) relation cannot be applied to them. According to him, the relation between Ji and Jigak is that of Do(道) and Gi(器). Similarly, the relation between Sim(心) and Sung(性) is that of subject and object. He also maintains that Jigak is not the phenomenalized mode of Ji, but the innate capability that employs Sung as the source of morality and turns it into feelings. In contrast, Han argues that Ji, as a ontological foundation of Jigak, is what enables Jigak to be a moral activity. In criticizing Kim Changhyup, Han maintains that if one denies the relation between Ji and Jigak, then one would have to characterize Jigak as a blind function with no moral sense. If one admits Jigak can have moral contents on its own without the connection with Ji, then one would have to allow two moral foundation, which leads one's idea into heretical beliefs. Han holds that Jigak can a moral function only when it is grounded upon Ji. In conclusion, Han emphasizes Ji as the base of Jigak that enables Jigak to realize morality while Kim emphasizes the role of Jigak as the principal agent of moral activity.

• Journal of Oriental Neuropsychiatry
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2012

Objectives : The objective of this study is the Basic research for mind and body cure protocol construction through the Sim(心) study at Buddhism Medicine, Constitutional Medicine, and Oriental Medicine. Methods : 1. The Sim(心) in Buddhism is a target of spiritual culture and subjective awareness of An ascetic person in interior psychology. In this research, the Sim(心) has been modified within a concept of Early Buddhism and You-sic in order to have medical logicality. 2. Since the study deep into Sim(心) within Confucianism has various aspects, each Confucian's theory argument or era. We limited the significance of the Sim(心) to be associated with the category of the Sim(心) in Sasang Constitutional Medicine which is a product of practical Confucianism. 3. The criteria of debate for the Sim(心) is based on the "Hwang-je-nae-gyoung", because "Hwang-je-nae-gyoung" is founded to definite the term regarding spirit or mind in Oriental medicine Results : 1. "Hwang-je-nae-gyoung" which came from thought of You-Sic, thought of Taoism, and Early Buddhism becomes the theoretical basis for the Sim(心) in Buddhism Medicine, Sasang Constitutional Medicine, and Oriental Medicine. 2. The Sim(心) in the mind psychology of Buddhism Medicine, Sasang Constitutional Medicine, and Oriental Medicine has active aspects. but the visual thing // There are visual aspects being contrasted with 'Sim(心)' of mind psychology and aspects of activity in Buddhism medicine, Sasang constitutional Medicine and Oriental Medicine; which are 'Hrd', 'Hrdaya', 'four-large' 'five base', 'chin, chest, navel and abdomen', 'head, shoulder, waist and buttocks' consisting 'the body', and the heart and 'four interorgans' from the study of symbolical interorgans). In Buddhism Medicine, Sim(心)'s Epistemology is the most extensively understood fact about 'Sim(心)', and for Sasang Constitutional Medicine and Oriental Medicine. 'Sim(心)' is limited as an 'Element' that comprises the body. 3. The Functional area of the Sim(心) in the Buddhism Medicine, Sasang Constitutional Medicine, Oriental Medicine is composed with 'consciousness(意識)' 'manas-vij_na(末那識)', '_aya-vij_na(阿賴耶識)', 'mind greed(心欲)', 'Li(理)' and 'Sin(神)', about the interpretive area of 'Sim(心)', 'Sin(神)' of Oriental medicine is the most comprehensive concept, and on the side of the depth of 'thinking' and 'consciousness', '_aya-vij_na(阿賴耶識)' from Buddhism Medicine in the key point. 4. The Sim(心) in the Buddhism Medicine, Sasang Constitutional Medicine, has the positive and negative aspects, such as the 'Dukkha(煩惱)' and A merciful heart or Human Sim(心) and Taoism Sim(心).