• The Korean Journal of Financial Studies
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.215-229
• /
• 2004

이 연구는 우리나라 상장 제조기업의 자본조달행태를 외환위기를 기준으로 구분하여 분석함으로써 자본조달순위이론의 타당성 여부를 탐색하였다. 최적자본구조의 존재여부와 결정요인을 탐색하는 정태적 자본구조이론과 달리 우선순위에 따라 자본조달을 한다고 제시된 것이 동태적 성격의 자본조달순위이론이다. 1981년부터 2002년까지 우리나라 상장 제조업의 패널자료를 이용하여 분석한 결과 현금흐름의 회귀계수가 일관성 있게 음(-)의 부호를 나타냈는데 이것은 우리나라 기업들이 대체로 자본조달순위이론과 같은 행태로 자본을 조달하는 것으로 해석된다. 총자산 수익률변수도 자본조달순위이론을 지지하는 결과를 보여주었으며 외환위기이전과 이후의 차이는 크지 않은 것으로 나타났다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.87-94
• /
• 2000

본 논문은 교통사업들의 투자우선순위 결정시 적용 가능한 방법을 제시한다. 지금의 평가방법을 부정하는 새로운 방법이라기보다는 기존의 평가방법을 보완하는 기법이다. 특히 특성이 다른 교통사업들간의 평가시 이들 특성들이 평가과정에 감안되지 않을 경우는 평가결과의 대외 설득력이 부족하게 된다. 이를 극복하기 위해 지금까지 각종 정량적 정성적 방법을 동원하였지만 그 범위와 방법에 한계가 존재하였다. 이를 보완하는 대안으로서 본 논문에서는 기존 평가과정에서 고려되기 어려운 사업의 여러 특성들을 전문가들의 경험과 판단을 통해 최대한 반영하는 방법을 제시한다. 이 기법의 기본 이론은 집단의사결정이론(group decision theory)이며, 여기에 퍼지이론이 접목된 퍼지집단 결정이론(fuzzy group decision theory)을 적용하였다. 이 이론은 개인의 대안별 선호(우선순위)로부터 집단의 선호관계(우선순위)를 도출할 수 있다. 또한 도출된 투자우선순위결과에 대한 집단의 동의수준(만족도)을 추정할 수 있다. 이러한 정보는 최종 정책결정자의 중요한 판단자료로서 사용되어 질 수 있다. 그 동안 교통사업의 투자우선순위결정과정의 객관성의 부족으로 사업간 우선순위결과에 대한 신뢰가 그리 높지 않았다. 본 논문에서 제시한 방법은 기존의 투자우선순위의 평가방법을 보완하여 대외적인 신뢰성을 제고할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Studies
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.89-104
• /
• 2006

이 논문은 자본조달순위이론(pecking order theory)을 한국 유가증권시장에 상장된 제조기업을 대상으로 실증적 검정을 하였다. 설명변수로 기업의 자금부족(deficit)과 부채비율과의 관계를 분석한 결과 자본조달순위이론이 지지되는 결과를 얻지 못하였으며, 통제변수에 유형자산, 기업규모, 수익성 등 전통적인 자본구조영향요인 변수들을 포함시켜 분석한 결과, 정보비대칭이론에 의한 설명이 적합한 것으로 해석되었다. 유형자산이 증가할수록 부채비율은 감소하였고, 기업규모가 증가하면 레버리지가 감소하는 관계를 나타냈으며, 수익성이 증가함에 따라 부채비율이 감소하는 것으로 분석되었다. 직전년도의 부채규모가 높은 경우에는 당해 연도의 부채사용이 감소하고, 직전년도의 레버리지가 낮은 경우에는 당해 연도의 부채가 증가하는 평균회귀현상을 나타냈다.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.1-32
• /
• 2008

This study examines the changes and determinants of cash to assets ratios(cash ratios) by analyzing 14,016 Korean manufacturing firms sample for the period of $1999{\sim}2004$. The major findings can be summarized as follows. First, the average cash ratios for Korean manufacturing firms have increased from 4.7 percent of 1999 to 5.2 percent of 2004. In addition, the average cash holdings per firm also have increased from 4.3 billion Won to 8.0 billion Won during the same period. However, the capital expenditures relative to cash ratios or operating cash flow have decreased significantly, confirming the notion that physical investment of Korean manufacturing sector has been shrinking recently. Second, in regression tests with panel data, the coefficients of target adjustment variables show the expected negative signs, but coefficients of the deficit of fund variables show the unexpected positive signs. Thus, the evidence seems to be supportive of static tradeoff model of cash holdings. Third, in regression tests to find the determinants of cash ratios, most of the variables show similar results as the previous studies. However, in terms of adjusted coefficient of determination and F-statistic, the firm-characteristic variables suggested by static trade-off theory have more explanatory power than the variables suggested by pecking order theory.

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.31 no.1
• /
• pp.89-116
• /
• 2012

This paper is an empirical study for the listed manufacturing companies in the Korea Stock Exchange during the sample period(2001-2010). The research is based on the target adjustment model(Shyam-Sunder and Myers(1999)) and the pecking order model(Frank and Goyal(2003)), and is aimed at reflecting the critical viewpoint of Chirinko and Singha(2000). An analysis in the model of Shyam-Sunder and Myers(1999) shows the value is too low to support the pecking order model in view of the following results. A target adjustment coefficient value is between 0 and 1, and is significant variable and explanatory power is very high, while deficit-in-funds coefficients close to 0. In addition, the result of an empirical test following the methodology used by Frank and Goyal(2003) does not support the pecking order theory.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Railway
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.45-53
• /
• 2008

With the growing international consensus regarding sustainable development of transportation, the plan of transportation infrastructure needs to meet various requirements toward enhancing environmental conditions. Accordingly, the upcoming long-term plan of high-speed rail network has to be reflecting the sustainability of transportation systems. In this paper, we demonstrate an application of methodologies based on multi-attribute utility theory for determining priorities of sustainable high-speed rail investment. The proposed methodologies identify indicators for sustainable transportation systems such as economic, environmental, and social ones and then, evaluate priority for planning a long-term sustainable high-speed rail network by comparing the relative importance among indicators. This will help transportation agencies to prioritize high-speed rail investment toward sustainable transportation systems.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.518-526
• /
• 2017

This study analyzed the impact of family firms and their characteristics on how they use debts to analyze the decision-making process of Korean family firms. For analysis, we classified the characteristics of family firms into three categories, through the influence of the relationship between the lack of funds and net debt issuance, which was confirmed as the 'packing order theory' of family firms. There was a total of 4,503 enterprises in the Korean Exchange (KRX). The period of analysis was 10 years, between 2004 and 2014. To summarize, Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999) validated the packing order theory by presenting a model of family businesses that showed greater applicable to higher packing order theory than a model of non-family businesses. Moreover, the results also confirmed the application of the packing order theory by the family stronger corporate governance and ownership structure. The ownership and governance characteristics of the ruling family has also shown the applicability of higher packing order theory.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2005.05b
• /
• pp.275-279
• /
• 2005

수자원 개발에 있어 중요한 문제 중의 하나는 개발가능지의 선택과 후보지가 복수일 때 개발 우선순위를 결정하는 것이라 할 수 있다. 이러한 문제 해결을 위하여 적지분석을 실시한다. 적지분석 과정은 크게 기초 조사 및 자료수집, 예비후보지의 선정, 대안평가, 입지선정의 :t단계로 구분되는데 여기서 2-3단계인 예비후보지 선정과 대안평가 단계가 적지분석 기법이 적용되어야 할 과정이다. 기존의 의사결정 방법론들은 각 대안의 우선순위를 위해 각 항목들에 대한 가중치나 확률치를 이용한 수치적 계산에 의한 방법들이 대부분이며, 또한, 각 후보지에 대해서 동일한 항목에 대한 정보를 요구하게 되어 한 후보지이라도 정보가 없는 경우 우선순위를 위한 계산과정에서 제외하거나 결정자의 경험 등에 의한 추정 값을 사용할 수밖에 없다. 이러한 이유로 본 연구에서는 입지선정에서 대상 후보지의 인자비교를 위한 항목의 자료 유무에 관계없이 적지분석이 가능하도록 게임이론을 적용하여 수자원 개발 가능 후보지를 도출하기 위한 기본모형을 개발하였다.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.33-68
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this paper is to test the market timing hypothesis and impact of macro economic variables on capital structure choice as well as the traditional static trade-off and pecking order theories of capital structure in a integrated framework. Through a two stage test of target capital structure and capital structure choice, none of theories was consistently supported, but most of them were partly supported. In the first stage analysis of target ratio, coefficients of firm-specific variables generally supported the predictions of pecking order theory rather than those of the static trade-off theory. However, the result of the second stage test on capital structure choice supported the hypothesis of the static trade-off theory, which claims that firms usually set and pursue the target leverage ratio. Further, the result of the seconde stage shows that a simple pecking oder theory does not hold because firms with deficit of internal fund tend to issue bonds rather than stocks to raise outside fund. Also, the result indicates that the market timing hypothesis holds because firms with over-valued stocks tend to issue stocks rather than bonds. However, contrary to Korajczyk and Levy(2003), the impact of macro economic variables such as term or credit spreads on capital structure choice was negligible, and the impact of macro economic and market timing hypothesis variables were not greater in financially unconstrained firms as Korajczyk and Levy(2003) suggested.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.337-345
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between the characteristics of Korean family firms and the impact of debt financing. The analysis period was 10 years from 2004 to 2013, and the sample consisted of 4,008 non-financial firms listed on the Korea Exchange. For the analysis, the unbalanced panel data with time - series, cross - section data were formed and analyzed using panel data regression analysis. The results are as follows. First, Korean family firms use relatively less debt than non - family firms. It can be understood that family firms in which the dominant family owns and dominates the corporation are less likely to increase their debt because the agent problem is alleviated and the need for the control effect of Jensen (1986) is lowered. Second, in the verification of the packing order theory using the model proposed by Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999), family firms have higher compliance with the packing order theory than non-family firms do. When financing is needed, debt is preferred over equity issuance. However, for Korean family firms, 24.38% of the deficit funds are financed through the issuance of net debt, which is relatively low compared to the 75% shown in the analysis of Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999). These results reveal the limit to the strong claim that the Korean family firms follow the packing order theory.