Browse > Article

Priority Decision Making for Planning A Long-term Sustainable High-speed Rail Network using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory  

Park, Jin-Kyung (한국철도기술연구원 철도정책물류연구본부 교통계획연구팀)
Eom, Jin-Ki (한국철도기술연구원 철도정책물류연구본부 교통계획연구팀)
Lee, Jun (한국철도기술연구원 철도정책물류연구본부 교통계획연구팀)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Railway / v.11, no.1, 2008 , pp. 45-53 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the growing international consensus regarding sustainable development of transportation, the plan of transportation infrastructure needs to meet various requirements toward enhancing environmental conditions. Accordingly, the upcoming long-term plan of high-speed rail network has to be reflecting the sustainability of transportation systems. In this paper, we demonstrate an application of methodologies based on multi-attribute utility theory for determining priorities of sustainable high-speed rail investment. The proposed methodologies identify indicators for sustainable transportation systems such as economic, environmental, and social ones and then, evaluate priority for planning a long-term sustainable high-speed rail network by comparing the relative importance among indicators. This will help transportation agencies to prioritize high-speed rail investment toward sustainable transportation systems.
Keywords
Sustainable Development; Multi-Attribute Utility Theory(MAUT); Decision Making; High-Speed Rail;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 건설교통부(1999), 국가기간교통망계획(2000-2019)
2 임강원(1997), 도시교통계획-이론과 모형
3 Black, W. R. (2000), "Toward a Measure of Transport Sustainability", Proceedings of the 79th Annual Meetings of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D. C
4 Cantos, P. M. Gumbau-Albert and J. Maudos (2005), "Transport Infrastructures, Spillover Effects and Regional Growth: Evidence of the Spanich Case", Transport Reviews, Vol.25, pp.25-50   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Hayashi, H. and H. Morisugi (2000), "International Comparison of Background Concept and Methodology of Transportation Project Appraisal", Transport Policy, Vol.7, pp.73-88   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Yoon, K. P. and C. L. Hwang (1995), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publication Inc
7 한국교통연구원(2007), 국가기간교통망 수정계획(안) 공청회
8 Zietsman, J., R. R. Laurence and S. J. Kim (2006), "Transportation Corridor Decision-Making with Multi-Attribute Utility Theory", Int. J. Management and Decision Making, Vol.7, pp.254-266   DOI
9 Litman, T. (2007), "Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and Sustainable Transport Planning", Victoria Transport Policy Institute Paper 07-2706, Victoria, Canada
10 Chu, X. and S. E. Polzin (2000), "Timing Rule for Major Transportation Investments", Transportation, Vol.27, pp.201-219   DOI
11 한국개발연구원(2004), 도로.철도 부문사업의 예비타당성 조사 표준지침 수정.보완 연구(제4판)
12 Fruente, A. (2004), "Second-Best Redistribution Through Public Investment: A Characterization, an Empirical Test and an Application to the Case of Spain", Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.34, pp.489-503   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Jeon, C. M., A. Amekudzi and R. A. Guensler (2007), "Evaluating Transportation System Sustainability: Atlanta Metropolitan Region", Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meetings of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D. C
14 Jeon, C. M. and A. Amekudzi (2005), "Addressing Sustainability in Transportation System: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics", Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meetings of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D. C
15 Kennedy (2002), "A Comparison of the Sustainability of Public and Private Transportation System: Study of the Greater Toronto Area", Transportation, Vol.29, pp.459-493   DOI   ScienceOn
16 건설교통부(2006), 국가철도망 구축계획(2006-2015)