• The Journal of the Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• v.16 no.6
• /
• pp.295-303
• /
• 2016

The purposes of this study are to describe the process for the instrument construction and the development of scales on rating college students' adaptability and to analyze the technical qualities of the test. The primary goal of this study is to inform students and institutions what is needed to college student's adjustment process into university and college life. The scales are tested by specialty group and statistical methods, and finally composed of 142 items, which measures 8 scales, the academic integration, the social integration into college, career identity, emotional stability, learning condition's stability, relationship with professors, satisfaction degree of educational service, satisfaction degree of college education. This study analyzed 1,959 students' responses from 4 colleges and universities. This study confirms that the scales which this study developed show high concurrent evidence with the college student's adaptability inventory for Korean university and college students based on various development process, specially rapid great change of college. The result of factor analysis shows the evidence based on internal structures of the scales. The Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ of the subscales is .965, from 742 to .937. The prediction model to determine the possibility of dropout by 7 scales is statistically significant in .05, except learning condition's stability. According to CFA Model, RMSEA= .08~.09. dependence factor variance are explained by this study's CFA model. In conclusion, this study confirms that the scales which this study developed are valid and reliable instrument for Korean university and college students to predict their adaptability to college.

• 한국경영정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.111-116
• /
• 2007

체계적인 정보화 투자 및 관리를 위한 전사적 아키텍처(EA)를 도입한 기관과 기업이 늘어남에 따라, EA 도입의 성과를 명확하게 평가해야 할 필요성도 높아지고 있다. EA를 도입한 나라의 약 36%에서 EA의 도입 현황과 성과를 측정하고 있으며, 국내에서도 범정부 정보기술아키텍처 성숙도 평가모형을 개발하는 등, 다양한 접근 방법으로 EA 평가를 위한 방안을 연구하고 있다. 그러나 EA를 통해 추구하는 목적이 매우 다양하고, EA의 활용과 관리에 대한 표준체계가 없어 EA 평가모형의 적용 범위와 효용성은 매우 제한적이다. 본 연구는 조직의 EA 평가목적에 적합한 평가 대상 및 척도를 체계적으로 도출하기 위한 EA 평가모형 개발 프레임워크를 제안한다. 프레임워크는 IEEE Std 1471의 아키텍처 표현 개념 프레임워크를 EA에 적용하여 EA 평가모형 체계를 구성하고, EA 내부와 외부 이해당사자의 관심사항을 토대로 GQM 기법을 적용하여 EA 평가의 대상인 관점(viewpoint)과 평가 척도(metric)를 도출한다. 제안된 프레임워크를 적용하면 기업 및 조직의 EA 이해당사자가 의도하는 목적이 반영된 EA 평가모형을 개발할 수 있다. 모형의 상세화와 더불어 프레임워크를 실무에 적용하기 위해서 필요한 객관적인 평가기준과 모형 개발과 적용을 지원하는 도구에 대한 연구가 향후 과제이다.

• Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.41-59
• /
• 2003

The present study was conducted to (1) explore the perceptions of Korean men and women about what is an important relationship for them and how do each gender group construe relational self, and (2) develop the scale to assess the factors of relational self and verify construct validity of the scale. 40 college students and 60 adults participated in survey and FGI (Focused Group Interview) respectively, and content analysis of their responses yielded 2 categories with 39 characteristics of relational self. The one category was named 'instrumentality' which was important to men and the other was named 'expressivity' which was important to women. The list of 39 items was administered to a nationwide sample of 1503 Korean adults to assess their construal of relational self through the 6-point Likert scale. Principal axis factor analysis showed that the two categories were unidimensional with high reliability. As a result of factor analysis on each category, a total of 9 factors were extracted. Specifically, the instrumentality consisted of factors such as utilitarianism, independence, initiativeness, self-assurance, and competence. And the factors of expressivity were empathy, passiveness, dependency, consideration. The tests of mean difference revealed that men had higher scores in most of the instrumental factors, while women had higher scores in most of the expressive factors. But there was no sex difference in the interdependent self-construal scale(Cross, 2000) which has been frequently used for measuring relational self. This is related to the Korean's collective cultural characteristics, and it was concluded that the relationship with others is very important to both Korean men and women, but the meaning and expectation of the relationship as well as the method for its preservation are different to each sex group. In addition, the correlation analyses indicated that the feminity score was positively correlated with the expressiveness while the masculinity score was positively correlated with instrumentality. This result implicated the differences of relational self among Korean people were related to the socialization process of each sex, i.e., sex role identity. Finally, limitations of this study and the directions for future research were discussed.

• The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.219-239
• /
• 2009

This study investigated gender differences in contribution of antisocial personality and affective empathy to psychopathy. Two hundred fifteen college students (male, 118; female,97) completed three measures including the PPI-R(Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised), the PAI-ANT(Personality Assessment Inventory-Antisocial Features), and the EETS (Emotional Empathy Tendency Scale). According to the results, the mean scores of PPI-R and EETS in male group were higher than in female group. Antisocial features were positively associated with psychopathy in both male and female groups and negatively with affective empathy. Males showed that the scores of affective empathy were negatively associated with those of antisocial features and psychopath. Females showed that the scores of affective empathy were negatively associated with those of antisocial personality and psychopathy but the correlation was significant only with the scores of antisocial behavior (ANT-A). To scrutinize the differences between male and female groups, the scores on the PAI and EETS were compared between 30% upper and 30% lower groups based on the scores of the PPI-R. According to the results, the upper group of the scores on the PPI had higher scores on the PAI and lower scores on the EETS. The differences of the scores on the EETS between high-psychopathy and low-Psychopathy groups were bigger in male group than in female group. Explanations and implications of the results were discussed and the directions of the future studies were suggested.

• Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
• /
• v.30 no.2
• /
• pp.159-192
• /
• 2024

The purpose of this study is to validate the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ), a tool for measuring reactive-proactive aggression, in the context of South Korea. A thorough translation was conducted in collaboration with the original author. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), rating scale model (Rasch), differential item functioning (DIF), and convergent validity were performed on a sample of 510 South Korean individuals. The results revealed a two-factor structure of reactive and proactive aggression after removing one item showing dual loading. Rating scale analysis based on the Rasch model indicated the appropriateness of the 3-point Likert scale, with all items meeting fit criteria. Although the separation index and separation reliability of proactive aggression was marginally lower, the overall discrimination between participants and items was satisfactory. Examination of participant-item distribution indicated a suitable alignment between reactive aggression and participant ability levels, whereas proactive aggression exhibited slightly elevated item difficulty. Furthermore, three items were found to function differently based on gender. A moderate but statistically significant positive correlation was found between the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11-R (Korean version) and RPQ from the results of the convergent validity evaluation. Overall, this study employed rigorous statistical methods to validate the suitability of the RPQ for use in Korea, taking cultural nuances into account, and introduced the concepts of reactive and proactive aggression to the Korean general population.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.12a
• /
• pp.211-221
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 국내하이테크 기업의 기술혁신지향성과 시장지향성이 기업 성과에 미치는지 여부를 규명하고자 Moorman & Miner(1997), Kohli, Jaworski & Kumar (1993)가 개한 척도를 사용하여 탐색적인 연구를 실행하였다. 설문은 2006년 11월 한달 동안 서울 경기지역의 혁신관련 교육을 수행하는 교육 기관과 기술 기반의 제품 개발과 서비스를 수행하는 업체를 대상으로 시행하였다. 가설 검증을 위해 총 200부의 설문지를 배포하여 60부를 회수하여 수집된 자료는 SPSS v12.0을 이용하여 요인분석과 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과 기술혁신지향성은 성과에 영향을 미치나 시장지향성이 기업의 성과에 미치는 영향에 대해서는 확인할 수 없었다.

• Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.77-103
• /
• 2002

The goal of this study was to examine the effects of male gender role on the adjustment of Korean men. In study 1 Korean Male gender Role Scale was developed. A 52-item scale was constructed based on the responses of 432 college-aged and middle-aged men to theoretically-derived preliminary items. Five factors were extracted: achievement orientation, the initiative, task orientation, responsibility for family and friendship with male friends. Study 2 examined the relationship between male gender role and several adjustment variables. Correlational analyses indicated that in the college men self-esteem and career identity were positively correlated with the initiative and friendship with male friends was positively correlated with life satisfaction. College men's depression level was negatively correlated with the initiative and task orientation. Among the middle-aged men, self-esteem was also positively correlated with the initiative and task orientation. But responsibility for family was positively correlated with depression and job dissatisfaction in the middle-aged men. In both groups satisfaction with male gender role was positively correlated with self-esteem and life satisfaction but negatively correlated with depression. Finally, limitations of this study and direction of future research were discussed.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.6 no.5
• /
• pp.257-274
• /
• 2015

The purpose of the current study was to validate Fetzer Institute & National Institute on Aging Working Group[NIA](1999)'s Brief-Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality Scale (BMMRS) in Korean adults. The Korean version of BMMRS, Spiritual Well-Being Scale(SWS), Korean Sprituality Scale(KSS), Penn State Worry Questionnaire(PSWQ), and Intolerance of uncertainty Scale(IUS) were administered to the 286 students and community samples. A principle axis factoring analysis with direct oblimin rotation and Kaiser normalization identified a six-factor solution accounting for 66.24% of the variance in scores, labeled as: positive spiritual experience, negative spiritual experience, forgiveness, religious practices, negative congregational support, and positive congregational support. Confirmatory factor analysis results showed that 6 factor model of BMMRS have a good fitness. Also, the internal consistency(.64~.97) and the test-retest reliablity was adequate.(.72~.88) Korean version of BMMRS has adequate psychometric characteristics so it can be used to verify the effects of various compassion-related psychotherapeutic approaches.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2004.10a
• /
• pp.505-520
• /
• 2004

정부는 중소기업의 업무성과(업무처리의 신속성과 능력 향상, 정확한 자료관리, 고객 대응 능력 향상, 의사결정의 신속성)를 높이고자 하는 목표를 가지고 다양한 정보화사업을 시행하고 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 목적으로 2001년부터 산업자원부가 지원한 3만개 중소기업의 ERP(Enterprise Resource Planning) 시스템의 도입에 따른 업무성과에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 파악하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 총 1022개의 설문응답을 회수하였다. 설문의 업무성과 응답이 5점 서열척도임을 고려하여 이에 적합한 ordered probit 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과는 모든 종속변수들과 유의한 관련성을 가지는 독립 변수는 사용용이성, 시스템 안정성, 정보의 정확성, 그리고 정보의 다양성으로 나타났다.

• The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
• /
• v.21 no.5
• /
• pp.61-68
• /
• 2018

Collaborative filtering is a fundamental technique implemented in many commercial recommender systems and provides a successful service to online users. This technique recommends items by referring to other users who have similar rating records to the current user. Hence, similarity measures critically affect the system performance. This study addresses problems of previous similarity measures and suggests a new similarity measure. The proposed measure reflects the subjectivity or vagueness of user ratings and the users' rating behavior by using fuzzy logic. We conduct experimental studies for performance evaluation, whose results show that the proposed measure demonstrates outstanding performance improvements in terms of prediction accuracy and recommendation accuracy.