• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2011.06a
• /
• pp.66-67
• /
• 2011

항로를 횡단하여 건설되는 교량이 증가하고 해상교통의 증가에 비례하여 항로의 혼잡도가 증가하는 만큼 선박과 교량의 충돌우려가 커지고 있다. 선박과 교량의 충돌은 단순 접촉사고가 아닌 재난급 사고의 개연성이 크다. 직접 손괴를 일으키는 큰 충돌이 아니더라도 선박과 교각의 충격진동에 의하여 교량상판이 균형을 잃고 연쇄 붕괴하는 일이 종종 발생하여 많은 인명의 손실이 발생하고 있기 때문이다. 적정 교각 폭, 교각의 시인성 증진을 위한 표지와 등화의 설치 및 점등방법 등의 환경 여건 개선, 충돌방지공의 효과 검토, 교량 통과전 사전 점검사항, 교량 부근에서 선박의 조종성 유지방안, 예선의 효과 연구, 관제기법과 안전규정, 불가피한 충돌이나 접촉의 경우 손실 감소대책과 충돌방지공의 효과 등 다각적인 연구가 필요하다. 면피용 탁상이론을 배제하고 현장실무의 경험을 바탕으로 실효적인 방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2007.12a
• /
• pp.376-382
• /
• 2007

A Collapse of bridge by ship's collision to the bridge post may lead a great calamity. This paper investigates on avoiding collision between a ship and bridge by improvement of environmental factors, submitting a counter plan of reducing collision effect by triangular type of collision protecting bar and ship maneuvering skills. Putting up collision protecting bar fences of triangular type around the bridge posts would decrease the collision impact force by 75 percent.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2020.11a
• /
• pp.44-44
• /
• 2020

• Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.169-176
• /
• 2005

An analysis of the annual frequency of collapse(AF) is performed for each bridge pier exposed to ship collision. From this analysis, the impact lateral resistance can be determined for each pier. The bridge pier impact resistance is selected using a probability-based analysis procedure in which the predicted annual frequency of bridge collapse, AF, from the ship collision risk assessment is compared to an acceptance criterion. The analysis procedure is an iterative process in which a trial impact resistance is selected for a bridge component and a computed AF is compared to the acceptance criterion, and revisions to the analysis variables are made as necessary to achieve compliance. The distribution of the AF acceptance criterion among the exposed piers is generally based on the designer's judgment. In this study, the acceptance criterion is allocated to each pier using allocation weights based on the previous predictions.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.26 no.1A
• /
• pp.11-19
• /
• 2006

In this study ship collision risk analysis is performed to determine the design vessel for collision impact analysis of suspension bridge. Method II in AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications which is a more complicated probability based analysis procedure is used to select the design vessel for collision impact. From the assessment of ship collision risk for each bridge pier exposed to ship collision, the design impact lateral strength of bridge pier is determined. The analysis procedure is an iterative process in which a trial impact resistance is selected for a bridge component and a computed annual frequency of collapse(AF) is compared to the acceptance criterion, and revisions to the analysis variables are made as necessary to achieve compliance. The acceptance criterion is allocated to each pier using allocation weights based on the previous predictions. This AF allocation method is compared to the pylon concentration allocation method to obtain safety and economy in results. This method seems to be more reasonable than the pylon concentration allocation method because AF allocation by weights takes the design parameter characteristics quantitatively into consideration although the pylon concentration allocation method brings more economical results when the overestimated design collision strength of piers compared to the strength of pylon is moderately modified. The design vessel for each pier corresponding with the design impact lateral strength obtained from the ship collision risk assessment is then selected. The design impact lateral strength can vary greatly among the components of the same bridge, depending upon the waterway geometry, available water depth, bridge geometry, and vessel traffic characteristics. Therefore more researches on the allocation model of AF and the selection of design vessel are required.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.175-183
• /
• 2022

The collision between a ship and bridge across a waterway may result in extremely serious consequences that may endanger the safety of life and property. Therefore, factors affecting ship bridge collision must be investigated, and the impact force should be discussed based on various collision conditions. In this study, a finite element model of ship bridge collision is established, and the peak impact force of a ship bridge collision based on 50 operating conditions combined with three input parameters, i.e., ship loading condition, ship speed, and ship bridge collision angle, is calculated via numerical simulation. Using neural network models trained with the numerical simulation results, the prediction model of the peak impact force of ship bridge collision involving an extremely short calculation time on the order of milliseconds is established. The neural network models used in this study are the basic backpropagation neural network model and Elman neural network model, which can manage temporal information. The accuracy of the neural network models is verified using 10 test samples based on the operating conditions. Results of a verification test show that the Elman neural network model performs better than the backpropagation neural network model, with a mean relative error of 4.566% and relative errors of less than 5% in 8 among 10 test cases. The trained neural network can yield a reliable ship bridge collision force instantaneously only when the required parameters are specified and a nonlinear finite element solution process is not required. The proposed model can be used to predict whether a catastrophic collision will occur during ship navigation, and thus hence the safety of crew operating the ship.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.26 no.1A
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2006

An analysis of the annual frequency of collapse(AF) is performed for each bridge pier exposed to ship collision. From this analysis, the impact lateral resistance can be determined for each pier. The bridge pier impact resistance is selected using a probability-based analysis procedure in which the predicted annual frequency of bridge collapse, AF, from the ship collision risk assessment is compared to an acceptance criterion. The analysis procedure is an iterative process in which a trial impact resistance is selected for a bridge component and a computed AF is compared to the acceptance criterion, and revisions to the analysis variables are made as necessary to achieve compliance. The distribution of the AF acceptance criterion among the exposed piers is generally based on the designer's judgment. In this study, the acceptance criterion is allocated to each pier using allocation weights based on the previous predictions. To determine the design impact lateral resistance of bridge components such pylon and pier, the numerical analysis is performed iteratively with the analysis variable of impact resistance ratio of pylon to pier. The design impact lateral resistance can vary greatly among the components of the same bridge, depending upon the waterway geometry, available water depth, bridge geometry, and vessel traffic characteristics. More researches on the allocation model of AF and the determination of impact resistance are required.

• Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.203-211
• /
• 2008

More recently, the massive marine bridges in a ship passage have been constructed on the sea. Therefore, the ship impact protection for the bridge-piers are installed to consider the possibility of vessel collision danger. Due to the ship impact protection, the pier-scour characteristics are changed in comparison with the condition without the ship impact protection (SIP). In this study, the physical modeling for the Incheon Sea-Crossing Bridge was performed to analyze the pier-scour characteristics with respect to the vessel collision protection. The rigid and movable bed tests were conducted to evaluate the flow pattern, scour depth, and scourhole with and without the ship impact protection. The experimental results for the maximum scour depth is increased 0.24 m in W1 pier at the same location and 2.4 m in W2+3+4 piers due to the SIP installation. Especially, the maximum scour depth in W2+3+4 piers was occurred around the SIP.

• Proceedings of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute Conference
• /
• 2010.04a
• /
• pp.738-741
• /
• 2010

최근 국내에서 해상교량 건설이 증가하면서 교량에 충돌하는 선박의 충돌력에 대한 관심도 증가하지만 선박충돌력에 대한 국내 기준은 AASHTO LRFD에 근거를 두고 있는 실정이다. AASHTO LRFD에 의한 선박충돌력은 Woisin의 평균충돌력 개념에 바탕을 두고 있으며, 충돌속도가 증가함에 따라 AASHTO LRFD에서 제시하는 충돌력의 변화곡선을 따르고 있다. 하지만 AASHTO에서 제시된 충돌력 변화곡선은 선박의 최대충돌력 변화곡선과 같이 선형적 변화를 보이는 반면, 본 선박 충돌해석 결과의 평균충돌력은 최대충돌력의 선형적 변화거동과 일치하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 선박의 비선형 충돌해석을 통하여 AASHTO LRFD에 의해 산정되는 선박충돌력의 부적절성을 거론하였다.

• 한국방재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2010.02a
• /
• pp.41.2-41.2
• /
• 2010

하천, 해상 등에 위치한 교량 설계시 선박충돌을 방지하기 위해 교각 위치를 변화시킬 필요성이 발생한다. 이 때, 교각 위치에 따른 변단면을 갖는 PSC(Prestressed concrete) 박스거더의 형상 변화를 효과적으로 변경하기 위해 고려해야하는 구속조건을 추출하고 정의하였다. PSC 박스거더는 변단면 시공에 일반적으로 적용되는 FCM(Free cantilever method) 공법이 착용된 교량을 착용했으며, 구속조건 정의를 위해 설계지침서를 분석하여 구속조건으로 작용하는 매개변수를 추출하였다. 정의한 구속조건의 적용성을 검증하기 위해 파라메트릭 모델링을 수행하였으며, 그 결과로 생성된 모델에 대한 물량을 산출하여 대상교량에서 산출된 실제 물량과 비교 분석하였다.