• The Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.89-92
• /
• 2013

• KIPE Magazine
• /
• v.6 no.6
• /
• pp.16-22
• /
• 2001

• KIPE Magazine
• /
• v.6 no.6
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2001

• The Proceeding of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science
• /
• v.29 no.6
• /
• pp.35-39
• /
• 2018

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.359-392
• /
• 2002

This study attempts to bibliographic analysis of Sam-Ryak(三略) which is contained one of Mu-Kyung Chil Seo(武經七書). There were many Print and Publication of Sam-Ryak(三略) in Cho-sun(朝鮮) Dynasty. This study collected related records seen at historical materials and systemize each book-edtion. Also an introduction of new Korean-translation Version(諺解本) of Sam-Ryak(三略) printed in 1711 is considered to be a great help in the study of Korean Language especially in the late period of Cho-sun(朝鮮) Dynasty.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.149-166
• /
• 2004

This study make comparative analysis of the cataloging rules on the edition area included in the KCR4, NCR(2001), AACR2R, ISBD(M), and ISBD(ER). There is a delicate difference between the cataloging rules. The main features on the edition are as the follows. (1) In the bibliography description the concept of the edition is a general application. That is to say, the edition construct the new edition and the impression. The former comes the purview of a change content, the size, and a printing type. The latter publish newly- (2) The requisite for description of the edition area consists of a edition statement, statements of responsibility relating to the edition, additional edition statement, and statements of responsibility following an additional edition statement. Voluntary rules transcribe the parallel edition statement. (3) In the case of the electronic materials special versions on content and Auction indicates as the edition, but the environment of software does not indicate as it. (4) Parallel statement of responsibility relating to the edition, parallel additional edition statements, and parallel statements of responsibility following an additional edition statement are voluntary rules or not transcribed in the edition area.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.237-258
• /
• 2013

As topics of researchers become diverse horizontally or vertically, academic libraries have difficulties to identify the dynamic change of researchers' needs for academic publications. This research aims to illustrate the topic areas of researchers in a department of university by analyzing bibliographies of their publications. First, researchers' publications were used to discover the topic areas where the researchers had published. Second, the cited publications in those papers were analysed to identify the expanded topic areas of these researchers. Finally, highly cited journals were analyzed by network analysis method. The major finding is that the importance of topic areas by the number of journals was not necessarily proportional to that by the number of papers. Researchers have a tendency to use many papers in a small number of journals in a certain topic area. Furthermore, the importance of topic areas discovered by researchers' publications was not the same as that discovered by researchers' citations.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.20
• /
• pp.223-270
• /
• 1991

To give any science or discipline an assured status, the most important and fundamental thing is to establish the method of research. 'Bibliography' is an ambiguous and much-abused term in any area, oriental, anglo-american, or latin countries. This study is a little essay to examine the different theories of these three areas and to synthesize the common factors. It is devised three parts : the definition of the term itself and the transition of its concept, the introduction of each theory, and a proposition of methodology based on these theories. In all, bibliography is commonly understood to mean (i) a list of books and other graphic materials arranged according to some system, (ii) the study of books as material objects include historical and textual problems, (iii) as a science of books, the systematic study of all conditions of its production, diffusion, and utilisation, including the study of factors of explication of phenomenon, on the political, economical, technical, social and culturel plans.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.46 no.4
• /
• pp.285-309
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to analyze whether bibliographic factors influence citation speed and the number of citations or not and whether citation speed affects the number of citations. Another purpose of this study is that if bibliographic factors carry out a significant role. For this analysis, this study is based on the assumption that all papers published by researchers in South Korea distributed power law shape. The main results of this study are as follows: First, the papers written by foreign first authors or reprint authors were cited more quickly from first citation speed and average citation speed. These papers were cited much more from first citation speed and average citation speed than by domestic first authors or reprint authors. The papers, collaborated by international researchers, were cited more quickly from first citation speed but were not different from average citation speed than by only domestic researchers. The papers, collaborated by international researchers, were cited much more than by only domestic stand-alone researchers. The number of authors and the impact factor influenced first citation speed, average citation speed and the number of citations. Second, the faster first citation speed and the slower average citation speed, the more papers were cited. First citation speed more affected the higher number of citations than the average citation speed. Third, all five bibliographic factors influenced the impact relationship from first citation speed to the number of citations through the moderating effect analysis. Fourth, only three bibliographic factors (the country of the first author; the country of the reprint author; the number of the coauthors) affected the impact relationship from first citation speed to the number of citations but two bibliographic factors did not influence through the moderating effect analysis.

• Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.15-20
• /
• 2008