• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.17 no.12
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2019

In this paper, we propose a new industry - university collaboration plan through the analysis of the present state of industry-academia cooperation and government support projects, and analysis of major overseas cases. The following is the plan for activating the new crop cooperation. First, it is necessary to strengthen the innovation of education system and establishment of new education course based on future demand through future-oriented industry-university cooperation. Second, active industry-academia cooperation should stimulate entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurship based on university resources. Third, it should act as an anchor of regional innovation by actively cooperating with local innovation entities. It is necessary to develop an industry-university cooperation model that can generate profits and contribute to university finance.

• Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.217-236
• /
• 2005

This paper aims to analysis the production linkage relationships between large firm and its subcontracting firms, especially focus on the spatial network and collaboration network. For the purpose of it, the division of semiconductor in Samsung Electronics and its most important subcontracting firms are picked up for the case study. The empirical study show that the location distribution pattern of Samsung Electronic's subcontracting firms is concentrated very highly on the Kyeong-Ki Province and Chung-Nam Province in Korea, which is the location sites of Samsung Electronic's key plants as well as the best environment for business in Korea. And the major subcontracting firms seems to be in the hierarchic and vertical relationship with Samsung Electronics rather than horizontal and good collaboration network in this case.

• Environmental and Resource Economics Review
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.85-117
• /
• 1997

이 논문에서는 이산화탄소 배출 감축을 위한 국제적 협력이 구체화 될 경우 동아시아에서 잠재적 상호 협력 대상국이 될 수 있는 한국, 중국, 일본을 대상으로 그리고 논의의 주요한 시기적 기점이 되는 1990년에 대해 이산화탄소 배출량을 추정하고 삼국간의 배출량의 차이를 산업별로 비교하고 그 차이를 발생시키는 요인에 대해 분석을 시도하고 있다. 여기서 중국은 지구온난화 가스 배출에 있어서도 세계에서 주요한 비중을 차지하고 있다는 점에서 그리고 한국은 새로운 OECD 회원국이 된 대표적인 신흥공업국으로서 지구 온난화 가스 감축을 위한 국제적 압력의 대상이 되고 있다는 점에서, 그리고 일본은 동아시아에서 환경문제에서도 유일한 선진국으로서 국제적 협력관계에서 지원국의 입장에 서게 될 것이라는 점에서 각각 중요한 의의가 있다. 한편 1990년은 1992년의 지구온난화 협약에서 논의의 기준연도이기도 하지만 한국과 일본에서 산업연관분석 통계가 이용 가능한 최근의 연도이기도 하다. 그러나 중국의 경우 이용 가능한 1987년도 산업연관분석 통계자료가 사용되었으며, 삼국에 대해 각각 에너지 및 이산화탄소 배출 원단위 통계 등을 이용하여 이산화탄소 배출량의 추정 및 배출 요인의 비교 분석이 이루어 졌다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.565-591
• /
• 2008

Using theories of sectoral innovation system and supply chain management, this paper examines the status quo of Korean IT SoC industry's innovation system by comparing it with Taiwanese one. Taiwan IT SoC industry has accomplished a rapid growth on the basis of government policies that foster domestic firms after the establishment of Hsinchu Science Park. Cooperative networks between foundries firms and fablesses have been formed within the supply chain in this process. Therefore, Taiwan industry has possessed the possibility of the coevolution in sectoral innovation system. However, Korean IT SoC industry has failed to form cooperative networks, because of weak networks between related firms. In other words, there exists an interaction failure, which is a kind of the system failure, and it means a lack of linkage between actors as a result of insufficient use of complementarities and interactive learning. Therefore, Korean industry has little possibility of the coevolution in sectoral innovation system. The cooperative networks between actors are prerequisite towards evolution of innovation system of Korean IT SoC industry. Above all, the cooperative networks between fablesses and system companies need to be strengthened within the supply chain.

• 전기산업
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 2003

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.192
• /
• pp.2-3
• /
• 2004

• Nuclear industry
• /
• no.3_4 s.6
• /
• pp.57-59
• /
• 1982

• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.27 no.6 s.292
• /
• pp.4-8
• /
• 2007

• The Journal of Aerospace Industry
• /
• s.34
• /
• pp.75-93
• /
• 1995

• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.7 no.8 s.54
• /
• pp.93-94
• /
• 1987