• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.50 no.4
• /
• pp.493-510
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to lay the groundwork for internationalization of domestic journals in the field of Library and Information Sciences (LIS). This study analyzed the characteristics and trends of 7,302 papers from 38 SSCI journals and 768 papers from 4 domestic journals in LIS. Results show the publication and citation counts of domestic journals to be more evenly distributed than those of international journals, which suggests the presence of core international journals. In addition, citation rates and co-authored papers of international journals are shown to be much higher than that of domestic journals, suggesting that international journals publish research papers of higher impact and collaboration.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2016.08a
• /
• pp.9-13
• /
• 2016

한국학술지인용색인 KCI의 인용지표가 본격 서비스된 것은 2008년 이후로서 최근 2014년 인용지수가 발표되었다. 7년 동안의 영향력 지수를 비롯하여 KCI가 제공하는 IF 지수와 자기인용율 등의 인용지표 변화 추세를 인문학, 사회과학, 예술체육, 복합학의 4개 인문사회 계열과 자연과학, 공학, 농수해양, 의약학의 4개 공학 계열로 나누어 분석하여 국내 학술지 생태계의 변화를 부분적으로 살펴보고자 하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.657-661
• /
• 2006

오늘날 지식기반사회에서 새로운 과학의 출현이 새로운 산업으로 확산되어 국가경쟁력에 이바지하고 있다. 일반적으로 논문을 통한 연구는 과학을 대변하고, 기술은 특허로 대체되는 것으로 인지하고 있다. 현재 과학은 SCI 의 인용색인 데이터를 바탕으로 각 문헌에 대한 인용통계정보를 제공하는 저널평가 테이터베이스인 JCR을 활용하여 분석하고 평가, 파악하고 있는 실정이다. 과학기술 분야의 누적된 논문수, 인용횟수, 연구자 분석 등 다양하게 적용할 수 있다. 반면 특허는 전체 출원, 등록건수 등 국가의 거시적인 흐름을 평가하는 수단으로는 주로 활용되어지고 있으나 정보소스의 한계나 분석시의 한계로 인하여 다양한 분석이 활용되기 어려운 실정이다. 인용정보로서 활용시 이를 위한 과도한 전처리 작업이 요구되며, 분석이 번거롭고 용이하지 않는 현실이므로 다양하게 분석시 사용하기가 어렵다. 이를 활용하여 문헌에 적용된 분석을 활용하여 새로운 고부가 정보를 제안해 보고자 한다.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.50 no.3
• /
• pp.23-47
• /
• 2019

In order to ascertain disciplinary differences in publication patterns that can help improve assessment of research performance in Korea, we analyzed the bibliometric data of six disciplines from Korea Citation Index. Results showed differences in research size, competitiveness, productivity, impact, and collaboration among disciplines. Disciplines in science were the largest in terms of author and institution followed by humanities and social science, but humanities produced the most publications per author, followed by social science and science disciplines. Sociology publications received most citation per paper but humanities received most citations per author, which was greatly influenced by the number of co-authors per paper. Distribution of author counts per paper varied widely across disciplines. Humanities were dominated by single-author publications, whereas the majority of publications in sciences were co-authored. The study also highlighted differences in citation lag time and illustrated differences in distribution and impact of core authors and institutions across disciplines.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.30 no.2
• /
• pp.227-243
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to verify the correlation between the appearance frequency of author keyword and the number of citation in journal articles. In this study, we were trying to develop a methodology that can select the term having semantic relation with other terms and higher utilization to build a structured scientific glossary. In order to achieve this purpose, we analyzed the number of citation and the author keyword of the humanities and social science journal articles of the Korea Citation Index (KCI) from 2007 to 2011. This study found a correlation between appearance frequency of author keyword and the number of citation of the journal articles, with higher appearance frequency of author keyword of the journal articles being more cited.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.50 no.1
• /
• pp.189-207
• /
• 2016

Sharing and reutilizing of research data could not only enhance efficiency and transparency of research process, but also create new science through data integrating and reinterpretationing. Diverse policies about research data sharing and reutilizing have been developing, along with extending of research evaluating spectrum that across research data citation rate to social impact of research output. This study analyzed the scale and citation number of research data which has not been analyzed before in korea through data citation index using Kruskal-Wallis H analysis. As result, genetics and biotechnology are identified as subject areas which have most huge number of research data, however the subject areas that have been highly cited are identified as economics and social study such as, demographic and employment. And Uk Data Archive, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research are analyzed as data repositories which have most highly cited research data. And the data study which describes methodology of data survey, type and so on shows high citation rate than other data type. In the result of altmetrics of research data, data study of social science shows relatively high impact than other areas.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.36 no.3
• /
• pp.127-165
• /
• 2005

This study is focused on the quality of the Web databases which has been produced in science. For the quality evaluation of NDSL, PubMed, Scopus, and WoS, 10 evaluating criteria are developed on the basis of literature review. The evaluation results show that NDSL and PubMed are superior in the currentness and cost. Scopus and WoS are superior in the information of citing and the analysis tool. It is needed for purchasing, user training, and library service based on the above evaluation results.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2000.08a
• /
• pp.215-218
• /
• 2000

본 연구는 계량서지학적 측정을 통해 국내 문헌정보학자들의 연구동향을 규명하기 위하여, 국제적으로 가장 영향력 있는 사회과학분야 학술지에 대한 대표적인 인용색인 데이터베이스인 SSCI에 게재된 논문을 대상으로 다양한 관점, 즉 저자별, 주제별, 저널별. 출신학교별, 소속대학별, 연도별, 연령별, 핵심전공주제별, 핵심저자별 및 핵심저널별로 분석하였다. 본 연구는 향후 국내 문헌정보학의 국제화 및 이에 따른 연구방향을 제시하는데 유용할 것으로 본다.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.49 no.4
• /
• pp.53-71
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to identify bibliographic characteristics of the top level articles among KCI indexed academic articles. Unlike the existing analysis on citation and most-cited articles, this study analyzed their bibliographic characteristics. The 3,453 articles were collected from 17 social science fields in KCI. The characteristics of authors, institutions, publications, journals, and citations were analyzed. According to the result of the analysis, there was a difference in the ratio of single authors to co-authors and in the number of co-authors. The authors were mostly single authors or two co-authors. In general, the percentage of authors of one article was high. Second, the types of institutions were mostly universities, and there were differences in the number of institutions with authors in each field. And the frequency of the authors' affiliation appeared uneven. There were a number of excellent research institutes and authors depending on the field. Third, the average of years to take to become the top articles for publication was 11 years in 2018. Fourth, most of the published journals were KCI registered journals, and the influence of the journals was not a factor. Fifth, there were differences in the number of cited counts between fields. This study is meaningful to grasp the influencing factors on the bibliographic characteristics of the most-cited articles for the social science field.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.35 no.2
• /
• pp.5-21
• /
• 2001

This study is to examine into the research pattern of the domestic library and information science scholars through the bibliometric analysis. It analyzed treatise in SSCI, the model citation index database about the most authoritative social-scientific journals, with various viewpoints, such as authors, subjects, journals, native universities, post universities, years, core of the majoring subjects, major authors and journals. In addition, it analyzed citation factors of another treatise which appeared in SSCI. We foresee it will be useful to indicate the way of study following internationalization.