• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.6-12
• /
• 2018

방산보안은 방위산업과 관련된 보안으로 방위산업의 발전에 따라 방산보안의 정의도 변화되어왔다. 우리나라 방위산업은 1970년대에 본격적으로 육성되었고 방산보안은 군사기밀을 취급하며 방산물자를 생산하는 방위산업체의 보안으로 정의되어왔다. 최근 무기체계 및 핵심기술의 국제공동연구개발에 따른 도입 기술의 보호가 필요하고, 선진국 수준에 이른 국방과학기술을 이용한 방산물자의 수출이 증가하면서 방위산업기술을 보호하기 위한 방위산업기술보호법이 제정되었다. 방산보안의 역사를 살펴볼 때 큰 전환점이 도래하는 것이며 방산보안 시대를 구분하고 각 시대의 특징을 정리해보는 것이 의미가 있다. 본 논문에서는 방위산업기술보호법 제정 이후를 방산보안 2.0 시대로 규정하고, 시대 별 주요 특징을 비교하며 향후 발전방향을 고찰하였다.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2019

The outflow of defense technology can cause serious damage not only in terms of business losses, but also in terms of national security and national interests. Recently, the government has enacted the Defense Technology Security Act, recognizing the importance of technology in the defense industry, and prepared guidelines for the defense technology security accordingly. According to the law, institutions and companies with defense technologies should establish a defense technology protection system, and the government should implement various technology protection policies to improve their level of technology protection. In this study, the implications were derived by comparing existing technology protection guidelines and priority analysis was performed on the protection system details through AHP for self-diagnosis items in the defense technology security guidelines. As a result, it is expected that it will enable efficient diagnosis of the level of protection and policy support for the systematic establishment of the protection system for the target institutions.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.13-19
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 방위산업기술보호법 제정에 따른 국가혁신체제로의 방위산업기술보호 방안을 살펴본다. 특히, 본 연구는 많은 시간과 노력을 통해 개발한 연구개발의 성과를 어떻게 보호해야 할지 측면에서 분석한다. 국내외 기술보호 법령, 조직 등 분석을 통한 시사점을 도출하고 국가혁신체제 관점에서 3가지 개선방안을 제시한다. 전문인력의 단계적 확충 및 전문지원 기관 설립, 효율적인 실태조사 방안 그리고 국가혁신체제 차원에서의 기술보호인식의 전환을 제시한다. 효율적인 방위산업기술보호체계 구축을 위해서 가장 중요한 것은 방위산업기술을 보유한 대상기관 최고책임자(CEO)의 의지이다. 영세한 기업의 경우는 기술보호를 위한 자원의 할당이 쉽지 않기 때문에 CEO가 기술보호에 대한 투자의 중요함을 인식하는 것이 중요하다. 이를 위해서 정부는 지속적으로 기술보호의 중요성에 대한 홍보를 강화하고, 제도적으로 울타리에 들어올 수 있도록 하고, 중소기업의 경우 기술보호체계 구축 등을 우선적으로 지원해야 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.20 no.12
• /
• pp.265-270
• /
• 2019

In order to protect the advancement of defense technology that has a tremendous e?ect on both the national security and the economy, the Republic of Korea established the Defense Technology Security Act in 2015. As the new enactment brought changes to the landscape of the defense industry and defense industrial security, a new examination of the concept of the defense industrial security has now become necessary. Even after taking into consideration the undisclosed nature of defense industrial security research, and the fact that only the limited number of firms participates in the subject matter, scientific studies related to the topic have not been active. However, with the new enactment of the Defense Technology Security Act, it is necessary to expand the scope of security and to redefine the concept of defense industrial security. In this paper, we analyzed the research works on related technology protection policies and our environment of the defense industry in order to conceptualize defense industrial security. The established concepts are expected to provide a systematic way to protect the confidential and defense technology.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.45-49
• /
• 2018

방위산업기술보호법 및 방위산업보안업무훈령에 따라 체계종합업체는 협력업체 보안관리 업무를 수행하고 있으며, 비정형 상태의 불특정한 다수의 협력업체를 효율적으로 관리하기 위한 협력업체 등급 분류 기준, 등급별 보안점검 지표 마련을 위한 방법 및 PDCA 모델 적용을 통한 지속적 발전 방향에 대하여 알아본다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.21 no.11
• /
• pp.357-363
• /
• 2020

With the emphasis on protecting Defense Industry Technology, the Defense Industry Technology Protection Act (DITPA) was enacted (in 2015) and implemented. According to article 7 of the DITPA, a target institution may apply to the Director of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) for a decision as to whether the technology it possesses belongs to the Defense Industry Technology. The Director of the DAPA shall make a decision through a technical review and notify the applicant in writing of the result. On the other hand, as detailed procedures and standards for the decision are not stipulated, the objectivity of the decision result may deteriorate, and it is necessary to prepare a procedure suitable for the characteristics of the decision. In this study, a technology assessment procedure that can be applied to the Defense Industry Technology Decision is proposed through domestic and international technology protection regulations and case analysis. The procedure consists of three-stage: fundamental review, technical attribute review, comprehensive review. As a result of this study, it is expected that the objectivity of a technology assessment for the Technology Industry Technology Decision will be secured, and the efficiency will be improved.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.177-184
• /
• 2019

The Defense Technology Security Act was enacted in 2015 to protect the defense industrial technology from being duplicated or interfering technologies being developed, which prevents its value and utility from deterioration and prevents inappropriate export. Defense industrial technology refers to technology that should be protected for national security among the national defense science and technology related to the defense industry. However, technical identification criteria of identification and management system of protection technology are not regulated. Therefore, in this study, through the Delphi survey, diesel engine core technology identification criteria related to the high efficiency internal combustion engine propulsion technology among the 141 defense industrial technologies is established to improve the identification and management system of the technology to be protected among the defense industrial technology protection system. As a result of the study, operational operability, durability, safety, sequencing and modularization were established as diesel engine core technology identification criteria.

• Korean Security Journal
• /
• no.61
• /
• pp.333-352
• /
• 2019

In January and August 2019, there were amendments to the Unfair Competition and Trade Secrets Protection Act (UCPA) and the Industrial Technology Protection Act(ITPA). These amendments will contribute to technology protection. But these amendments need to be supplemented further. In the area of civil remedies, despite the introduction of treble damages in the case of the UCPA and ITPA, the provisions related to the submission of supporting data have not been maintained. Therefore, it is necessary to recognize the claim of the other party as true if it is maintained at the level of the revised Patent Act and the scope of submission of supporting data. And the enforcement of the case of compulsory submission for the calculation of damages, and the order of filing documents are not followed. ITPA, on the other hand, has introduced the compensation for damages, but there is no provision for estimating the amount of damages. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the amount of lost profits, profits, and royalties. In the area of criminal remedies, both the UCPA and ITPA have raised the penalty, but the sentencing regulations are not maintained. In addition, although the recent outflow of technology has expanded beyond organizational deviations to organizational outflows, amendments need to be made in relation to the serious consequence for the punishment of related juristic persons, such as companies involved in it. It should be noted that Japan and the United States have corporate regulations and regulations. In addition, in relation to the confiscation system, Act on Regulation and Punishment of criminal proceeds concealment require that domestic defenses be confiscated by defense industry technology, while trade secrets and industrial technologies are confiscated only by "foreign" outflows, and an amendment is necessary.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.9 no.7
• /
• pp.241-249
• /
• 2018

The military purpose vehicles are developed by using the platform of civil vehicles according to the commercial vehicle expansion plan and military supplied product commercialization policy. But the information related to the military purpose vehicle which adopts the same platform with the civil vehicle is forced to be exposed because its information is revealed by containing into the maintenance manual and electric circuit diagram. Especially, the information disclosure should be blocked by reviewing the application of technology protection because the military vehicle becomes combating purposed mixed equipment when the missile and radar are mounted. The mixed equipment means the one configured with more than 2 types of equipment, and it is categorized into the main and sub equipment. This study was performed to derive the problems in Korean system for vehicle part test evaluation on the mixed equipment and the defense industry technology protection system, and to derive the methods for improving through interviews with the specialists. The conflicts between the civil laws and army regulation were reduced by adding a clause that the engine reflected with the newest emission gas standard should be mounted based on the time of force integration, and the commercialized military supplies were designated as element technology of defense industry technology in consideration of its roles and functions.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.31 no.1
• /
• pp.111-122
• /
• 2021

With the spread of technology in the 4th Industrial Revolution, the defense industry in South Korea is getting developed into an industrial structure in which high-tech technologies are concentrated. As the importance of defense technology has gradually increased, the government has enacted the Defense Technology Security Act and required to build a protection system for institutions that possess or manage defense technology. In order for the target institution to introduce a protection system, it is necessary to identify the defense technologies that are protected and to ensure systematic data management. In order to cope with this, we derived master data items for data management and analyzed the implementation types of defense technology master data system suitable for the defense industry environments. The derived method identified the defense technology master data, such as primary and secondary master data, and through AHP analysis, Co-existence type was suitable as the target model for the master data management system. We expect that stronger defense technology security policy will be implemented through the defense technology MDM system.