• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.6-12
• /
• 2018

방산보안은 방위산업과 관련된 보안으로 방위산업의 발전에 따라 방산보안의 정의도 변화되어왔다. 우리나라 방위산업은 1970년대에 본격적으로 육성되었고 방산보안은 군사기밀을 취급하며 방산물자를 생산하는 방위산업체의 보안으로 정의되어왔다. 최근 무기체계 및 핵심기술의 국제공동연구개발에 따른 도입 기술의 보호가 필요하고, 선진국 수준에 이른 국방과학기술을 이용한 방산물자의 수출이 증가하면서 방위산업기술을 보호하기 위한 방위산업기술보호법이 제정되었다. 방산보안의 역사를 살펴볼 때 큰 전환점이 도래하는 것이며 방산보안 시대를 구분하고 각 시대의 특징을 정리해보는 것이 의미가 있다. 본 논문에서는 방위산업기술보호법 제정 이후를 방산보안 2.0 시대로 규정하고, 시대 별 주요 특징을 비교하며 향후 발전방향을 고찰하였다.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.177-184
• /
• 2019

The Defense Technology Security Act was enacted in 2015 to protect the defense industrial technology from being duplicated or interfering technologies being developed, which prevents its value and utility from deterioration and prevents inappropriate export. Defense industrial technology refers to technology that should be protected for national security among the national defense science and technology related to the defense industry. However, technical identification criteria of identification and management system of protection technology are not regulated. Therefore, in this study, through the Delphi survey, diesel engine core technology identification criteria related to the high efficiency internal combustion engine propulsion technology among the 141 defense industrial technologies is established to improve the identification and management system of the technology to be protected among the defense industrial technology protection system. As a result of the study, operational operability, durability, safety, sequencing and modularization were established as diesel engine core technology identification criteria.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2019

The outflow of defense technology can cause serious damage not only in terms of business losses, but also in terms of national security and national interests. Recently, the government has enacted the Defense Technology Security Act, recognizing the importance of technology in the defense industry, and prepared guidelines for the defense technology security accordingly. According to the law, institutions and companies with defense technologies should establish a defense technology protection system, and the government should implement various technology protection policies to improve their level of technology protection. In this study, the implications were derived by comparing existing technology protection guidelines and priority analysis was performed on the protection system details through AHP for self-diagnosis items in the defense technology security guidelines. As a result, it is expected that it will enable efficient diagnosis of the level of protection and policy support for the systematic establishment of the protection system for the target institutions.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.45-49
• /
• 2018

방위산업기술보호법 및 방위산업보안업무훈령에 따라 체계종합업체는 협력업체 보안관리 업무를 수행하고 있으며, 비정형 상태의 불특정한 다수의 협력업체를 효율적으로 관리하기 위한 협력업체 등급 분류 기준, 등급별 보안점검 지표 마련을 위한 방법 및 PDCA 모델 적용을 통한 지속적 발전 방향에 대하여 알아본다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.31 no.1
• /
• pp.111-122
• /
• 2021

With the spread of technology in the 4th Industrial Revolution, the defense industry in South Korea is getting developed into an industrial structure in which high-tech technologies are concentrated. As the importance of defense technology has gradually increased, the government has enacted the Defense Technology Security Act and required to build a protection system for institutions that possess or manage defense technology. In order for the target institution to introduce a protection system, it is necessary to identify the defense technologies that are protected and to ensure systematic data management. In order to cope with this, we derived master data items for data management and analyzed the implementation types of defense technology master data system suitable for the defense industry environments. The derived method identified the defense technology master data, such as primary and secondary master data, and through AHP analysis, Co-existence type was suitable as the target model for the master data management system. We expect that stronger defense technology security policy will be implemented through the defense technology MDM system.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.21 no.11
• /
• pp.357-363
• /
• 2020

With the emphasis on protecting Defense Industry Technology, the Defense Industry Technology Protection Act (DITPA) was enacted (in 2015) and implemented. According to article 7 of the DITPA, a target institution may apply to the Director of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) for a decision as to whether the technology it possesses belongs to the Defense Industry Technology. The Director of the DAPA shall make a decision through a technical review and notify the applicant in writing of the result. On the other hand, as detailed procedures and standards for the decision are not stipulated, the objectivity of the decision result may deteriorate, and it is necessary to prepare a procedure suitable for the characteristics of the decision. In this study, a technology assessment procedure that can be applied to the Defense Industry Technology Decision is proposed through domestic and international technology protection regulations and case analysis. The procedure consists of three-stage: fundamental review, technical attribute review, comprehensive review. As a result of this study, it is expected that the objectivity of a technology assessment for the Technology Industry Technology Decision will be secured, and the efficiency will be improved.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.19 no.12
• /
• pp.99-109
• /
• 2018

Tampering involves illegally removing technologies from a protected system through reverse engineering or developing a system without proper authorization. As tampering of a weapon system is a threat to national security, anti-tampering measures are required. Precedent studies on anti-tampering have discussed the necessity, related trends, application cases, and recent cybersecurity-based or other protection methods. In a domestic situation, the Defense Technology Protection Act focuses on how to prevent technology leakage occurring in related organizations through personnel, facilities and information systems. Anti-tampering design needs to determine which technologies are protected while considering the effects of development cost and schedule. The objective of our study is to develop methods of how to select target technologies and determine counter-measures to protect these technologies. Specifically, an evaluation matrix was derived based on the risk analysis concept to select the protection of target technologies. Also, based on the concept of risk mitigation, the classification of anti-tampering techniques was performed according to its applicability and determination of application levels. Results of the case study revealed that the methods proposed can be systematically applied for anti-tampering in weapon system development.