• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.19 no.6
• /
• pp.432-439
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to analyze the knowledge, attitudes, safety management behavior, and radiation anxiety of dental hygienists and to analyze affecting factors in order to improve the level of radiation safety management and reduce anxiety. The study period consisted of 280 dental hygienists working in Jeollabuk-do from September 10 to October 31, 2017 using the SPSS 12.0 program, frequency, descriptive statistics, and multiple regression analysis. The average knowledge level of radiation quality control was 8.07, and the correct answer rate was 75.3%. The attitude level was 96.1%, and the radiation safety management behavior was 4.11 for the photographer and 4.58 for the 'always wear a TLD (personal dosimeter) during radiography'. Patient radiation safety management behavior was 3.86, and the highest was '4.69' to confirm pregnancy of the woman before radiography. Radiation-covered lining was 3.86, and was the highest at 4.13 for 'I am concerned about fetal health when I am pregnant'. Factors affecting radiation exposure anxiety were lower radiation safety management behaviors, lower age, lower radiographic experience, higher educational background, higher monthly income, and higher job title (p<0.05). Based on the above results, dental hygienists had strong knowledge, attitudes, and safety management practices for radiation quality control. However, since anxiety related to radiation exposure was high, it is possible to improve radiation safety management level and reduce radiation exposure anxiety.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.357-363
• /
• 2022

This study aims to improve the safety inspection awareness of occupational exposure and help radiation safety management by analyzing radiation exposure doses by occupational type of radiation related-workers and radiation workers. Radiation-related workers and radiation workers were classified into three occupations (radiological technologist, doctors, and nurses). A nominal risk coefficient based on ICRP 103 was used to calculate the probability of causing side effects of the lungs due to exposure doses. As a result of analyzing the exposure dose of all workers for one year, the exposure dose of radiological technologist among radiation-related workers was 1.63 ± 2.84 mSv, doctors 0.12 ± 0.22 mSv, and nurses 0.59 ± 1.08 mSv. The one-year deep dose for radiation workers was 2.44 ± 3.30 mSv for radiological technologists, 0.19 ± 0.26 mSv for doctors, and 0.12 ± 0.00 mSv for nurses. Due to this dose, the probability of causing side effects in the lungs was 1.2 per 100,000 radiological technologist, 0.096 doctors, and 0.06 nurses. In this study, it is believed that the probability of side effects on lungs by occupation of radiation exposure dose will be studied and used as useful data for radiation safety management in relation to probabilistic effects in the future.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.307-308
• /
• 2017

방사선구역내의 종사자 간의 피폭선량 비교와, 동일한 구역내에서 임상실습에 임하는 학생들의 선량을 비교하여 방사선방어의 최적화에 대한 기초자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 연구대상은 2016년 1월부터 동년 12월까지 C대학병원 방사선관리구역에 재직중인 방사선관계종사자 121명과 방사선작업종사자 36명, 그리고 8주간의 임상실습을 이수한 121명의 학생을 비교 대상으로 하였다. 방사선관계종사자와 작업종사자 간의 평균 심부 및 표층선량은 관계종사자가 각각 $.7440{\pm}1.676mSv$와 $.7753{\pm}1.730mSv$ 가장 높게 나타났으며, 통계적으로 매우 유의하였다(p<.01). 3그룹간에는 심부선량의 경우 임상실습학생이 $.143{\pm}.136mSv$로 가장 높게 나타났고, 표층선량에서도 $.1513{\pm}.139mSv$로 가장 높게 나타났으며, 작업종사자가 두 경우 모두 가장 낮았으며, 그룹간의 평균의 차이는 통계적으로 매우 유의하였다(p<.01). 결론적으로 ALARA 원칙에 의거 철저한 관리가 필요하며, 특히 방사선안전관리의 사각지대에 놓여 있는 임상실습 학생에 대한 체계적인 피폭선량 관리가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

• Journal of radiological science and technology
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.483-489
• /
• 2015

DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) standards are generally introduced as de facto and de jure standards in modern medical imaging devices to store and to transmit medical image information. DICOM Dose Structured Report (DICOM dose SR) is implemented to report radiation exposure information in image acquiring process. and DIOCM Modality Performed Procedure Step (DICOM MPPS) is also partly used to report this exposure with the information in its DICOM tag. This article is focused on three type of radiation exposure information of DICOM standards, 1) DICOM dose SR, 2) DICOM MPPS and 3) Radiation Exposure Monitoring(REM) profile by Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise(IHE), to study on radiation exposure reporting. Healthcare facility and its staff of medical imaging related to radiation exposure should have a deep understanding of radiation exposure, and it required a standards to enhance the quality control of medical imaging and the safety of patients and staffs. Staff member have to pay attention on radiation exposures and controling processes from the purchasing stage of X-ray devices.

• Journal of radiological science and technology
• /
• v.29 no.3
• /
• pp.185-195
• /
• 2006

Purpose: This study investigated the status of radiation exposure doses since the establishment of the "Regulations on Safety Management of Diagnostic Radiation Generation Device" in January 6, 1995. Method: The level of radiation exposure in people engaged or having been engaged in radiation-related industries of inspection organizations, educational organizations, military units, hospitals, public health centers, businesses, research organizations or clinics over a 5 year period from Jan. 1, 2000 to Dec. 31, 2004 was measured. The 149,205 measurement data of 57,136 workers registered in a measurement organization were analysed in this study. Frequency analysis, a Chi-square test, Chi-square trend test, and ANOVA was used for data analysis. Results: Among 57,136, men were 40,870(71.5%). 50.3% of them were radiologic technologists, otherwise medical doctors(22.7%), nurse(2.9%) and others(24.1%). The average of depth radiation and surface radiation during the 5-year period were found to decrease each year. Both the depth radiation and surface radiation exposure were significantly higher in males, in older age groups, in radiological technologists of occupation. The departments of nuclear medicine had the highest exposure of both depth and surface radiation of the divisions of labor. There were 1.98 and 2.57 per 1,000 person-year were exposed more than 20 mSv(limit recommended by International Commission on Radiological Protection) in depth and surface radiation consequently. Conclusion: The total exposure per worker was siginifcantly decreased by year. But Careful awareness is needed for the workers who exposed over 20 mSv per year. In order to minimize exposure to radiation, each person engaged in a radiation-related industry must adhere to the individual safety management guidelines more thoroughly. In addition, systematic education and continuous guidance aimed at increasing the awareness of safety must be provided.

• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.22 no.4 s.230
• /
• pp.17-24
• /
• 2002

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.279-287
• /
• 2020

Recently, interest in radiation protection is increasing because of the occurrence of accidents related to exposure dose. So, the nuclear safety act provides to install the shields to avoid exceeding the dose limit. In particular, when the worker conducts the non-destructive testing (NDT) without the fixed shielding structure, we should monitor the access to the workplace based on a constant dose rate. However, when we apply for permits for NDT work in these work environments, the consideration factors to the estimation of the distance and exposure dose are not legally specified. Therefore, we developed the excel model that automatically calculates the distance, exposure dose, and cost if we input the factors. We applied the assumption data to this model. As a result of the application, the distance change rate was low when the thickness of the lead blanket and collimator is above 25 mm, 21.5 mm, respectively. However, we didn't consider the scattering and build-up factor. And, we assumed the shape of the lead blanket and collimator. Therefore, if we make up for these limitations and use the actual data, we expect that we can build a database on the distance and exposure dose.

• Journal of radiological science and technology
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.39-46
• /
• 2006

The rules and terms are described different meaning, in this results the research is accomplished for preventing practical workers from confusion. Atomic law are kept up modification and development in our situation by the ICRP's recommendation, on the other hand, the rules of diagnosis radiation equipment safety managements are modified partial, then resulted in confusion. The study was comparison between the rules of diagnosis radiation equipment safety management and atomic energy law, and the modification items obtained were as follows. 1. With each other different the terms and units are used. With the exception of special terms for affairs usage, it is needless to say that common term uniformity is standardized. The standardization of rules and guidance have not need to confusion radiological practical workers. 2. The following is omitted. 1) The radiation protection against tile patient and the hospital visitor. 2) Radiation dose limit of the woman patient who is in the process of becoming pregnant. 3) Radiation dose limit of the person who is not regarded as madical madical exposure. 4) The control of the exposure of pregnant of women at work.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• v.40 no.3
• /
• pp.162-167
• /
• 2015

Although the perfomance indicators of the nuclear power plants in Korea show optimal, it requires detailed analysis and discussion centered on the radiation dose. As analysis methods, analysis on the radiation dose of nuclear power plants over the past five years was assessed by comparing the relevant radiation dose of radiation workers and per capita average annual radiation dose of the world's major nuclear power stations was also analyzed. The radiation workers over the annual radiation dose limit of 50 mSv were not. The contrast ratio of the radiation exposure according to the reactor type was the normal operation of PHWR was 6.2% higher than those of the PWR. This shows the radiation work of PHWR during normal driving operation is much more than those of PWR. According to the Performance Indicators of the World Association of Nuclear Operator, the annual radiation dose per unit in 2013 showed 527 man-mSv of Korea is the best country among the major nuclear power generating states, the world average was 725 man-mSv. The annual per capita radiation dose is about 80% less than 1 mSv of the public dose limit and also the average per capita dose showed a very low level as 0.82 mSv. Workers in related organizations showed 1.07 mSv, the non-destructive inspection agency workers showed 3.87 mSv. The remarkable results were due to radiation reduced program such as development of radiation shielding and radiation protection. In conclusion, the radiation exposured dose of nuclear power plants workers in Korea showed a trend which is ideally reduced. But more are expected to be difficul and the psychological insecurity against the operation of the nuclear power plants is existed to the residents near the nuclear power plants. So the radiation dose reduction policy and radiation dose follow up study of nuclear power plants will be continously excuted.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2011.05b
• /
• pp.1072-1075
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 진단용 방사선피폭에 대한 환자 및 종사자의 방사선 인식도, 방사선 지식정도, 방사선 피폭의 유해성, 진단방사선의 필요성, 방사선의 피폭방지, 정보파악의 유무 및 파악경로, 방사선 검사 시 심리적 상태에 영향을 미치는 요인을 살펴보고자 하는 연구이다. 2010년 10월 25일부터 11월 10일까지 일개 광역시 소재하는 종합병원 및 의원에 근무하는 방사선사와 2주내에 진단 방사선을 이용한 해당 의료기관에 내원한 환자를 대상으로 총 347부의 유효설문지를 사용 하였다. 방사선에 대한 인식도에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 환자의 경우, 직업, 2년내 건강검진 경험, 방사선 피폭에 대한 설명을 들은 경험으로 나타났고, 근무자의 경우, 2년내 교육이수 경험으로 나타났다. 방사선에 대한 지식정도에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 환자의 경우, 2년내 건강검진 경험으로 나타났고, 근무자의 경우, 연령, 근무기관으로 나타났다. 방사선의 유해성에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 환자의 경우, 성별, 2년내 건강검진 경험, 정보매체로 나타났고, 근무자의 경우, 근무기관으로 나타났다. 방사선의 필요성에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 환자의 경우, 월소득, 거주지로 나타났고, 근무자의 경우, 결혼상태, 피폭선량계 착용여부, 환자에게 피폭에 대한 설명을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 방사선 피폭방지에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 환자의 경우, 직업, 월소득, 2년 내 건강검진 경험으로 나타났고, 근무자의 경우 환자에게 피폭에 대한 설명을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 방사선검사의 심리적 상태에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 환자의 경우, 방사선에 대한 피폭설명을 들은 경험, 직업으로 나타났고, 근무자의 경우, 연령, 경력, 2년내 교육이수 경험으로 나타났다. 그러므로 방사선 종사자들도 방사선의 위해성에 대한 올바른 인식을 하게 하여 방사선 방어를 적극적으로 할 수 있는 행동을 유도하기 위해서는 이용 방사선의 특성에 맞는 방사선 안전 관리 교육 프로그램의 개발과 방사선 종사자 스스로 방사선에 대한 안전성 확보를 위하여 노력해야 할 것이다.