• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.23 no.12 s.199
• /
• pp.1004-1004
• /
• 1985

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.8 no.9
• /
• pp.525-529
• /
• 1970

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.38 no.5 s.372
• /
• pp.399-403
• /
• 2000

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.35 no.2 s.333
• /
• pp.104-109
• /
• 1997

• 대한치과교정학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.68.1-68.1
• /
• 2005

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.35 no.11 s.342
• /
• pp.844-847
• /
• 1997

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.42 no.3 s.418
• /
• pp.184-189
• /
• 2004

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.414-420
• /
• 1996

Cephalometric measureements have disadvantage of representing cranio-facial structures in two dimension only and therefore they pose limitations in describing three-dimentional structures of cranio-facial region. More interests have been put on the correlation between the two planes. This study evaluated correlations between facial type score, which allows effects on malocclusion, growth change prediction and establishment of treatment method and prognosis, and measurements from submentovertex view. Cephalometric view and submentovertex view were taken of skeletal Class I adults with optimal profile and correlations between them have been observed. Following results were obtained: 1. To learn about factors that influence average condylar angulation, FACE, INT-CO-ANG, MN-CORPUS, CON-RATIO, GON-RATIO, MN-RATIO were used as variables and underwent multiple regression analysis. As a result, the following equation was obtained : CON-AVE=.l73(FACE)-.322(INT-CO-ANG)+36.34(GON-RATIO) +.420(MN-CORPUS) (($R^2=.85451$) 2. The following equation was obtained concerning facial type score. FACE= .050(CON-ANG)+.023(INT-CO-ANG)-.075(MN-CORPUS)($R^2=.31547$) 3. Among the submentovertex measurements, MN-CORPUS, CON-RATIO, GON-RATIO, MN-RATIO showed close correlations. (P<0.05) 4. Average condylar angualtions were $23.37^{\circ}$ on the right and $20.71^{\circ}$ on left. There was a difference between the two. FACE : facial type soore. CON-ANG: mean value of condylar angulation. CON-AVE: mean value of Rt. Lt condylar angulation. INT-CO-ANG : angle between Rt. Lt condylar axis. MN-CORPUS : angle formed between RT. Lt gonion & pogonion. CON-RATIO: lntercondylar distance/mandibular body length. GON-RATIO : intergonion distanoe/mandibular body length. MN-RATIO: lntermylohyoid distance/mandibular body length. MX-RATIO: intermaxillary tuberosity distance/ANS-PNS distance.

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.36 no.5
• /
• pp.380-387
• /
• 2006

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the right and left differences of frontal ramal inclination in chin-deviated individuals. Methods: Thirty adult patients with clinically apparent chin deviation were selected as the chin-deviated group, and 30 adult patients with symmetric faces were selected as the control group. On the posteroanterior cephalograms, the frontal ramal inclination was measured, and the right and left differences were compared and analyzed. Results: While the control group did not show right and left differences of frontal ramal inclinations, the chin-deviated individuals showed right and left differences of frontal ramal inclination. In chin-deviated individuals, the frontal ramal inclinations of the non-deviated side were statistically greater than those of the deviated side. The right and left differences of frontal ramal inclinations, with menton deviation and the right and left differences of maxillary heights showed statistically significant correlation. Conclusion: We conclude that the frontal ramal inclinations should be considered in the diagnosis of facial asymmetry.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.37-43
• /
• 1991

Cephalometric prediction tracing is the preoperative double checking procedure which can predict bony and soft tissue change. Soft tissue profile prediction is routinely performed according to the known ratios of the soft to hard tissue movement which can vary considerably in each individual. Besides interindividual variation of the ratios of the soft to hard tissue change, actual results of the postoperative soft tissue profile can reflect other important modifying factors if it is compared with prediction tracing used. The purpose of this study is to compare soft tissue prediction tracing used with postoperative tracing and to find intervening modifying factor via serial tracing. Review of 30 prediction tracing showed that the most important factor contributing to prodiction tracing inaccuracy was the skeletal and dental relapse. And, some factors which may be responsible for prediction tracing inaccuracy were discussed.