• Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.18-30
• /
• 2023

Purpose: This study is to contribute to the development of monitoring technology through the increase of confidence in construction monitoring by deriving the analysis of construction monitoring cost and improvement measures of railway tunnel construction in Seoul. Method: It presents the status on design and contract of construction monitoring cost, status on application construction monitoring cost and its analysis, analysis on safety management cost and quality management cost, expansion of application of the price calculation standard for monitoring management services to improve this, and monitoring for direct order of ordering organization. Results: If the monitoring management service that was meanwhile ordered as included in the construction work is performed by the directly selected company of ordering organization through the preliminary screening for bidding qualification, then the improvement of monitoring quality and the accurate monitoring data can be secured. Conclusion: For the price calculation standard for monitoring management service, the application of actual cost addition method under the Engineering Promotion Act and the calculation standard of monitoring management cost for standard estimation for ground survey should be extended through the direct order of ordering organization, not the method to be included in the net construction cost where it is performed by a subcontractor via contractor.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.8 s.193
• /
• pp.31-33
• /
• 2006

건설교통부는 지난 7월 24일 일반 · 전문건설업간 겸업제한 제도를 폐지하고, 하수급인과 건설근로자에 대한 보호강화 등 건설산업의 경쟁력 강화와 건전한 발전에 필요한 제도적 기반을 구축하기 위한 건설산업기본법개정안을 입법예고 했다. 개정안의 주요 내용은 △일반 · 전문건설업간 겸업제한 폐지△시공참여자제도 개선△ 건설업체 부도시 하도급 대금을 발주처에서 직접 지급△건설산업 부조리 해소를 위한 규정 보완△ 발주자에게 하도급계획서 제출 등이다. 건교부는 그동안 "기업 · 학계 · 연구원 · 정부"합동으로 포럼을 구성하여 10여 차례 토의하였고, 공청회, 관련업계 간담회 등을 통하여 폭넓은 의견수렴을 거쳤으며, 입법 예고를 통한 추가적인 의견수렴(7.25~8.14)과 규제심사등 정부입법과정을 거쳐 금년 10월중 국회에 제출할 예정이다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.81-89
• /
• 2010

Since 2004, the government has changedthe cost estimate system to one of an actual cost basis in order to calculate the optimum construction cost by reflecting changes in circumstance on the construction site in a timely manner. Currently, this is being applied to public construction work forover a billion won of actual cost data in estimation by contract unit cost. However, directly reflecting actual cost, which for large-sized construction work was originally an average unit cost, to a small building, entails the application of a low discount rate for the cost of materials, labor, etc. and therefore can frequently give rise to cases in which the actual cost of work performed exceeds the contract sum, which in turn causes problems such as decreased revenues, bad effectson business operation, productivity, etc. Therefore, to apply actual cost to small-sized construction work (less than a billion won), there should be a plan to modify unit cost in a manner that can reflect project scale, etc. in order to resolve the problem of unit cost application of actual cost to small-building construction projects. The unit cost modification model for proper actual construction cost in small-scale construction projects developed by this study will help to increase the relevant productivity and proper gain, preventing the aggravation of business operations. Organizations placing orders are also expected to be able to secure a more realistic construction cost in arranging the budget.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.79-90
• /
• 2021

In domestic public construction, disputes are increasing due to differences among stakeholders regarding contract price adjustment. In particular, the actual cost-plus fee for overhead costs due to the schedule extension cannot be agreed upon at the administrative phase, and most of them seek judicial judgment. Thus, this study aims to propose a 'sufficiently satisfactory' alternative to reach an agreement before disputes in order to minimize disputes related to the calculation of additional overhead costs. To this end, this study proposes three alternatives based on the rate method. Firstly, when calculating additional overhead costs, it is not calculated as an actual cost-plus-fee method, but as a rate compared to direct labor costs among net direct costs. Secondly, the calculated indirect labor costs are compensated for up to the legal maximum of legal limit costs such as general management costs, profits and so on. Thirdly, it reflects overhead costs increased or decreased due to change orders. Risks were analyzed by collecting expert opinions on the proposed methods and applying actual cases. Finally, as a result of investigating the level of consensus for each stakeholder, it was confirmed that all stakeholders could agree regardless of the size of the company. The result of this study is expected to as a useful tool among stakeholders in the construction fields that can be able to easily agreed upon.