• Title/Summary/Keyword: 반턱

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

An Experimental Study on the Roof Exposure Waterproofing Method of Tenon Jointing Type used Shiplap Rubberized Asphalt Color Sheet (반턱 고무 아스팔트 칼라 시트를 이용한 접합부 맞춤식 옥상 노출 방수공법에 관한 실험적 연구)

  • Lee, Jung-Hoon;Lee, Sun-Gyu;Kwak, Hyo-Ya;Oh, Sang-Keun
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2008.05a
    • /
    • pp.73-77
    • /
    • 2008
  • In this study, we would like to study on the application of roof exposure waterproofing method of joint stability through shiplap rubberized asphalt color sheet to complement problem of fracture, exfoliation and water leakage by existing roof exposure sheet waterproofing material joint weakness. Accordingly, examined basis performance and stability for joint that shiplap rubberized asphalt color sheet through test of that tensile strength, bonding strength, water permeability after bonding, peel resistance after bonding, lengthen resistance after bonding and hang resistance after bonding. The results of this study, waterproofing method to using shiplap rubberized asphalt color sheet is judged to solved fracture, exfoliation and water leakage problems happened in joint by problem was joint of exposure sheet by minimizing gap of joint being integration by shiplap.

  • PDF

A Study on the Structural Methods between Purlin and Beam at Wooden Architecture in Joseon Dynasty (조선시대 목조건축 도리와 보의 결구방법에 관한 연구)

  • Jung, Yun-Sang
    • Journal of architectural history
    • /
    • v.16 no.6
    • /
    • pp.87-100
    • /
    • 2007
  • This study examines on the structural Methods between purlin and beam at Wooden Architecture in Joseon Dynasty($1372{\sim}1910$). Through the investigation, it is verified that the structural methods between purlin and beam is the technique utilizing tenon joint(통장부맞춤), Sungeoteok joint(숭어턱맞춤), dovetailed tenon joint(주먹장맞춤). And the methods of tenon joint is followed by the Sungeoteok joint, which is used in the buildings after middle Joseon dynasty. The method of tenon joint(통장부맞춤) is to connect the beam with the purlin by carving out the head of the beam as '一' shape. And the structural methods between Janghyeo(장혀, timber under purlin) and beam is halved joint(반턱맞춤) and tenon joint (통장부맞춤). The buildings in late Goryeo Dynasty and Joseon Dynasty adopted the method of tenon joint between purlin and beam. The method of Sungeoteok joint is to connect the beam with the purlins by carving out the head of the beams '凸' shape. And the structural methods between Janghyeo and beams is halved joint(반턱맞춤) and tenon joint(통장부맞춤), the method of tenon and step joint(통장부턱맞춤), dovetailed joint between beam and Janghyeo to increase the security of shear force.

  • PDF

Strength Performance Evaluation of Threaded Nail Joints of Wooden Retaining Wall Using Pitch Pine (Pinus rigida Miller) Square Timber (리기다 소나무 정각재를 사용한 목재옹벽의 직결나사못 접합부 내력 성능 평가)

  • Song, Yo-Jin;Kim, Keon-Ho;Lee, Dong-Heub;Hwang, Won-Joung;Hong, Soon-Il
    • Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology
    • /
    • v.39 no.1
    • /
    • pp.53-59
    • /
    • 2011
  • A connection was made between a single stretcher and 2 headers with 2 threaded nails (Type-A), and another one between 2 stretchers and 2 headers with 4 threaded nails (Type-B) to use as specimens. Type-C was the stretchers that are connected with 2 threaded nails by half lap joint at end-distance 5D to reinforce Type-B, Type-C1 the stretchers that are connected by half lap joint at end-distance 10D, and Type-C2 with 3 threaded nails at end-distance 10D. Compressive shear strength of Type-C, the supplementation of Type-B, was decreased by 30%, compared with that of Type-B. Those of Type-B and Type-C1 that used longer end-distance than Type-C were about the same, and that of Type-C2 connected with 3 threaded nails was 1.28-times stronger than that of Type-C1. Connection of the retaining wall using existing square timber has a problem between long and short stretchers and 2 headers. So it was investigated in the experiment to replace it. Therefore, if Type-B is replaced with Type-C2 in constructing the retaining wall, the crack and the rupture of timber caused by threaded nail as well as construction period can be reduced, and also it can be expected to increase their own strength.

Strength Evaluation of Pinus rigida Miller Wooden Retaining Wall Using Steel Bar (Steel Bar를 이용한 리기다소나무 목재옹벽의 내력 평가)

  • Song, Yo-Jin;Kim, Keon-Ho;Lee, Dong-Heub;Hwang, Won-Joung;Hong, Soon-Il
    • Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology
    • /
    • v.39 no.4
    • /
    • pp.318-325
    • /
    • 2011
  • Pitch pine (Pinus rigida Miller) retaining walls using Steel bar, of which the constructability and strength performance are good at the construction site, were manufactured and their strength properties were evaluated. The wooden retaining wall using Steel bar was piled into four stories stretcher and three stories header, which is 770 mm high, 2,890 mm length and 782 mm width. Retaining wall was made by inserting stretchers into Steel bar after making 18 mm diameter of holes at top and bottom stretcher, and then stacking other stretchers and headers which have a slit of 66 mm depth and 18 mm width. The strength properties of retaining walls were investigated by horizontal loading test, and the deformation of structure by image processing (AlCON 3D OPA-PRO system). Joint (Type-A) made with a single long stretcher and two headers, and joint (Type-B) made with two short stretchers connected with half lap joint and two headers were in the retaining wall using Steel bar. The compressive shear strength of joint was tested. Three replicates were used in each test. In horizontal loading test the strength was 1.6 times stronger in wooden retaining wall using Steel bar than in wooden retaining wall using square timber. The timber and joints were not fractured in the test. When testing compressive shear strength, the maximum load of type-A and Type-B was 130.13 kN and 130.6 kN, respectively. Constructability and strength were better in the wooden retaining wall using Steel bar than in wooden retaining wall using square timber.